Adams Stephen P, Sekhon Sarpreet S, Tsang Michael, Wright James M
Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, 2176 Health Sciences Mall, Medical Block C, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z3.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 6;3(3):CD012282. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012282.pub2.
Fluvastatin is thought to be the least potent statin on the market, however, the dose-related magnitude of effect of fluvastatin on blood lipids is not known.
Primary objectiveTo quantify the effects of various doses of fluvastatin on blood total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL cholesterol), high-density lipoprotein (HDL cholesterol), and triglycerides in participants with and without evidence of cardiovascular disease.Secondary objectivesTo quantify the variability of the effect of various doses of fluvastatin.To quantify withdrawals due to adverse effects (WDAEs) in randomised placebo-controlled trials.
The Cochrane Hypertension Information Specialist searched the following databases for randomised controlled trials up to February 2017: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2017, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1946 to February Week 2 2017), MEDLINE In-Process, MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, Embase (1974 to February Week 2 2017), the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, CDSR, DARE, Epistemonikos and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also contacted authors of relevant papers regarding further published and unpublished work. No language restrictions were applied.
Randomised placebo-controlled and uncontrolled before and after trials evaluating the dose response of different fixed doses of fluvastatin on blood lipids over a duration of three to 12 weeks in participants of any age with and without evidence of cardiovascular disease.
Two review authors independently assessed eligibility criteria for studies to be included, and extracted data. We entered data from placebo-controlled and uncontrolled before and after trials into Review Manager 5 as continuous and generic inverse variance data, respectively. WDAEs information was collected from the placebo-controlled trials. We assessed all trials using the 'Risk of bias' tool under the categories of sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and other potential biases.
One-hundred and forty-five trials (36 placebo controlled and 109 before and after) evaluated the dose-related efficacy of fluvastatin in 18,846 participants. The participants were of any age with and without evidence of cardiovascular disease, and fluvastatin effects were studied within a treatment period of three to 12 weeks. Log dose-response data over doses of 2.5 mg to 80 mg revealed strong linear dose-related effects on blood total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol and a weak linear dose-related effect on blood triglycerides. There was no dose-related effect of fluvastatin on blood HDL cholesterol. Fluvastatin 10 mg/day to 80 mg/day reduced LDL cholesterol by 15% to 33%, total cholesterol by 11% to 25% and triglycerides by 3% to 17.5%. For every two-fold dose increase there was a 6.0% (95% CI 5.4 to 6.6) decrease in blood LDL cholesterol, a 4.2% (95% CI 3.7 to 4.8) decrease in blood total cholesterol and a 4.2% (95% CI 2.0 to 6.3) decrease in blood triglycerides. The quality of evidence for these effects was judged to be high. When compared to atorvastatin and rosuvastatin, fluvastatin was about 12-fold less potent than atorvastatin and 46-fold less potent than rosuvastatin at reducing LDL cholesterol. Very low quality of evidence showed no difference in WDAEs between fluvastatin and placebo in 16 of 36 of these short-term trials (risk ratio 1.52 (95% CI 0.94 to 2.45).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Fluvastatin lowers blood total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglyceride in a dose-dependent linear fashion. Based on the effect on LDL cholesterol, fluvastatin is 12-fold less potent than atorvastatin and 46-fold less potent than rosuvastatin. This review did not provide a good estimate of the incidence of harms associated with fluvastatin because of the short duration of the trials and the lack of reporting of adverse effects in 56% of the placebo-controlled trials.
氟伐他汀被认为是市场上效力最低的他汀类药物,然而,氟伐他汀对血脂影响的剂量相关效应程度尚不清楚。
主要目的量化不同剂量氟伐他汀对有或无心血管疾病证据的参与者血液总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白(LDL胆固醇)、高密度脂蛋白(HDL胆固醇)和甘油三酯的影响。次要目的量化不同剂量氟伐他汀效应的变异性。量化随机安慰剂对照试验中因不良反应导致的撤药情况(WDAEs)。
Cochrane高血压信息专家检索了以下数据库以获取截至2017年2月的随机对照试验:Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)(2017年第1期)、MEDLINE(1946年至2017年2月第2周)、MEDLINE在研、MEDLINE Epub提前发表、Embase(1974年至2017年2月第2周)、世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台、CDSR、DARE、Epistemonikos和ClinicalTrials.gov。我们还联系了相关论文的作者以获取更多已发表和未发表的研究。未设语言限制。
随机安慰剂对照试验以及前后对照的非对照试验,评估不同固定剂量氟伐他汀在3至12周内对任何年龄有或无心血管疾病证据的参与者血脂的剂量反应。
两名综述作者独立评估纳入研究的资格标准并提取数据。我们分别将安慰剂对照试验和前后对照的非对照试验的数据作为连续数据和通用逆方差数据录入Review Manager 5。WDAEs信息从安慰剂对照试验中收集。我们使用“偏倚风险”工具在序列生成、分配隐藏、盲法、不完整结局数据、选择性报告以及其他潜在偏倚等类别下评估所有试验。
145项试验(36项安慰剂对照试验和109项前后对照试验)评估了氟伐他汀在18846名参与者中的剂量相关疗效。参与者年龄不限,有或无心血管疾病证据,且在3至12周的治疗期内研究氟伐他汀的效果。2.5毫克至80毫克剂量的对数剂量反应数据显示,对血液总胆固醇和LDL胆固醇有强烈的线性剂量相关效应,对血液甘油三酯有较弱的线性剂量相关效应。氟伐他汀对血液HDL胆固醇无剂量相关效应。每日10毫克至80毫克的氟伐他汀可使LDL胆固醇降低15%至33%,总胆固醇降低11%至25%,甘油三酯降低3%至17.5%。每增加两倍剂量,血液LDL胆固醇降低6.0%(95%可信区间5.4至6.6),血液总胆固醇降低4.2%(95%可信区间3.7至4.8),血液甘油三酯降低4.2%(95%可信区间2.0至6.3)。这些效应的证据质量被判定为高。与阿托伐他汀和瑞舒伐他汀相比,在降低LDL胆固醇方面,氟伐他汀的效力约为阿托伐他汀的1/12,为瑞舒伐他汀的1/46。极低质量的证据表明,在这些短期试验中的36项试验中的16项中,氟伐他汀与安慰剂在WDAEs方面无差异(风险比1.52(95%可信区间0.94至2.45))。
氟伐他汀以剂量依赖性线性方式降低血液总胆固醇、LDL胆固醇和甘油三酯。基于对LDL胆固醇的影响,氟伐他汀的效力比阿托伐他汀低12倍,比瑞舒伐他汀低46倍。由于试验持续时间短以及56%的安慰剂对照试验未报告不良反应,本综述未能很好地估计与氟伐他汀相关的危害发生率。