Pronovost Peter J, Armstrong C Michael, Demski Renee, Peterson Ronald R, Rothman Paul B
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
J Health Organ Manag. 2018 Mar 19;32(1):2-8. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-09-2017-0238. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to offer six principles that health system leaders can apply to establish a governance and management system for the quality of care and patient safety. Design/methodology/approach Leaders of a large academic health system set a goal of high reliability and formed a quality board committee in 2011 to oversee quality and patient safety everywhere care was delivered. Leaders of the health system and every entity, including inpatient hospitals, home care companies, and ambulatory services staff the committee. The committee works with the management for each entity to set and achieve quality goals. Through this work, the six principles emerged to address management structures and processes. Findings The principles are: ensure there is oversight for quality everywhere care is delivered under the health system; create a framework to organize and report the work; identify care areas where quality is ambiguous or underdeveloped (i.e. islands of quality) and work to ensure there is reporting and accountability for quality measures; create a consolidated quality statement similar to a financial statement; ensure the integrity of the data used to measure and report quality and safety performance; and transparently report performance and create an explicit accountability model. Originality/value This governance and management system for quality and safety functions similar to a finance system, with quality performance documented and reported, data integrity monitored, and accountability for performance from board to bedside. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first description of how a board has taken this type of systematic approach to oversee the quality of care.
目的 本文旨在提供六项原则,卫生系统领导者可运用这些原则来建立护理质量和患者安全的治理与管理体系。
设计/方法/途径 一个大型学术卫生系统的领导者设定了高可靠性目标,并于2011年成立了质量委员会,以监督医疗服务提供场所的质量和患者安全。卫生系统及每个实体(包括住院医院、家庭护理公司和门诊服务)的领导者组成了该委员会。该委员会与每个实体的管理层合作,设定并实现质量目标。通过这项工作,形成了用于解决管理结构和流程问题的六项原则。
发现 这些原则包括:确保在卫生系统提供医疗服务的各个场所都有质量监督;创建一个组织和汇报工作的框架;识别质量模糊或欠发达的护理领域(即质量孤岛),并努力确保对质量指标进行汇报和问责;创建一份类似于财务报表的综合质量报表;确保用于衡量和汇报质量与安全绩效的数据的完整性;以及透明地汇报绩效并创建明确的问责模式。
原创性/价值 这种质量和安全治理与管理体系的运作方式类似于财务系统,记录和汇报质量绩效,监控数据完整性,并从董事会到病床边追究绩效责任。据作者所知,这是首次描述董事会如何采用这种系统方法来监督护理质量。