Samanta A, Burden A C, Jones G R
Diabet Med. 1985 Sep;2(5):371-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1985.tb00654.x.
We have studied the hyperglycaemic effect of the carbohydrate of glucose, sucrose, and honey equivalent to 20 g in twelve normal volunteers, eight patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), and six patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Honey produced an attenuated postprandial glycaemic response in normal volunteers (vs glucose p less than 0.005; vs sucrose p less than 0.05) and IDDMs (vs glucose p less than 0.005; vs sucrose p less than 0.05). The glycaemic index (GI) showed considerable variability within each subject group. Combined with a peak incremental index (PI), the two indices appear to be more valuable in predicting the glycaemic effects of carbohydrates rather than either one alone. We suggest that honey may prove to be a valuable sugar substitute in diabetics, and that both the GI and PI should be used in the analysis of food.
我们在12名正常志愿者、8名胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(IDDM)患者和6名非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(NIDDM)患者中,研究了相当于20克葡萄糖、蔗糖和蜂蜜的碳水化合物的高血糖效应。蜂蜜使正常志愿者(与葡萄糖相比,P<0.005;与蔗糖相比,P<0.05)和IDDM患者(与葡萄糖相比,P<0.005;与蔗糖相比,P<0.05)的餐后血糖反应减弱。血糖指数(GI)在每个受试者组内显示出相当大的变异性。结合峰值增量指数(PI),这两个指数在预测碳水化合物的血糖效应方面似乎比单独使用任何一个指数更有价值。我们认为,蜂蜜可能被证明是糖尿病患者有价值的糖替代品,并且GI和PI都应用于食物分析。