Schulich Heart Centre, Division of Cardiology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (G.E-G., D.T.K., H.C.W.).
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.M., J.F., D.T.K., H.C.W.).
Circulation. 2018 Jul 31;138(5):483-493. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.033432.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) represents a paradigm shift in the therapeutic options for patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, rapid and exponential growth in TAVR demand may overwhelm capacity, translating to inadequate access and prolonged wait times. Our objective was to evaluate temporal trends in TAVR wait times and the associated clinical consequences.
In this population-based study in Ontario, Canada, we identified all TAVR referrals from April 1, 2010, to March 31, 2016. The primary outcome was the median total wait time from referral to procedure. Piecewise regression analyses were performed to assess temporal trends in TAVR wait times, before and after provincial reimbursement in September 2012. Clinical outcomes included all-cause death and heart failure hospitalizations while on the wait list.
The study cohort included 4461 referrals, of which 50% led to a TAVR, 39% were off-listed for other reasons, and 11% remained on the wait list at the conclusion of the study. For patients who underwent a TAVR, the estimated median wait time in the postreimbursement period stabilized at 80 days and has remained unchanged. The cumulative probability of wait-list mortality and heart failure hospitalization at 80 days was ≈2% and 12%, respectively, with a relatively constant increase in events with increased wait times.
Postreimbursement wait time has remained unchanged for patients undergoing a TAVR procedure, suggesting the increase in capacity has kept pace with the increase in demand. The current wait time of almost 3 months is associated with important morbidity and mortality, suggesting a need for greater capacity and access.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)代表了严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者治疗选择的重大转变。然而,TAVR 需求的快速和指数级增长可能会使能力不堪重负,导致获得途径不足和等待时间延长。我们的目的是评估 TAVR 等待时间的时间趋势及其相关的临床后果。
在加拿大安大略省的这项基于人群的研究中,我们确定了 2010 年 4 月 1 日至 2016 年 3 月 31 日期间所有 TAVR 转诊患者。主要结果是从转诊到手术的中位总等待时间。进行分段回归分析以评估 2012 年 9 月省级报销前后 TAVR 等待时间的时间趋势。临床结果包括在等待名单上时的全因死亡和心力衰竭住院。
研究队列包括 4461 名转诊患者,其中 50%导致 TAVR,39%因其他原因被取消,11%在研究结束时仍在等待名单上。对于接受 TAVR 的患者,报销后估计的中位等待时间稳定在 80 天,并且没有变化。80 天的等待名单死亡率和心力衰竭住院的累积概率分别约为 2%和 12%,随着等待时间的增加,事件相对稳定地增加。
接受 TAVR 手术的患者的报销后等待时间保持不变,表明容量的增加与需求的增加保持同步。目前将近 3 个月的等待时间与重要的发病率和死亡率相关,表明需要更大的容量和获得途径。