Suppr超能文献

与内部人士合作:社区参与研究、教育和社会关怀中的同伴模式综述。

Partnering with insiders: A review of peer models across community-engaged research, education and social care.

机构信息

Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center/University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Political Science, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Community. 2018 Nov;26(6):769-786. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12562. Epub 2018 Mar 7.

Abstract

Within community-engaged research, education and social care, peer models that partner with local "insiders" are increasingly common. Peer models are composed of insider "lay" community members who often share similarities or background with a project's target population. Peers are not academically trained, but work alongside researchers and professionals to carry out specific tasks within a project, or in the truest sense of partnership, peers collaborate throughout the project from start to finish as an equal member of the team. Although peer models are used widely, the literature lacks consistency and clarity. This systematic review of literature used a qualitative thematic synthesis to examine and report how, where and why peer models have been used in research, education and social care. We examined the language and titles used to describe the peers, details of their involvement in community-engaged projects, the setting, content/topic of study, level of engagement and related benefits/outcomes of such models. Focusing on the last 10 years, we conducted a comprehensive literature search twice between September 2016 and June 2017. The search resulted in 814 articles which were assessed for eligibility. Overall, 251 articles met our inclusion criteria and were categorised into three categories: empirical (n = 115); process/descriptive (n = 93); and "about" peers (n = 43). Findings suggest that there is a wide variety of peers, titles and terminology associated with peer models. There is inconsistency in how these models are used and implemented in research studies and projects. The majority of articles used an employment peer model, while only a handful involved peers in all phases of the project. The results of this literature review contribute to understanding the use, development and evolution of peer models. We highlight potential benefits of peer models for peers, their communities and community-engaged work, and we offer recommendations for future implementation of peer models.

摘要

在社区参与式研究、教育和社会关怀中,与当地“内部人士”合作的同伴模式越来越常见。同伴模式由内部“外行”社区成员组成,他们通常与项目的目标人群有相似之处或背景。同伴没有接受过学术培训,但与研究人员和专业人员一起完成项目中的具体任务,或者在真正的合作伙伴关系中,从项目开始到结束,同伴都是团队的平等成员,全程协作。尽管同伴模式被广泛使用,但文献缺乏一致性和清晰度。本文献系统回顾使用定性主题综合方法,检查和报告同伴模式在研究、教育和社会关怀中的使用方式、地点和原因。我们检查了描述同伴使用的语言和标题、他们在社区参与项目中的参与细节、环境、研究内容/主题、参与程度以及此类模式的相关收益/结果。我们专注于过去 10 年,在 2016 年 9 月至 2017 年 6 月期间进行了两次全面文献搜索。搜索结果产生了 814 篇文章,这些文章都进行了资格评估。总的来说,有 251 篇文章符合我们的纳入标准,并分为三类:实证(n=115);过程/描述性(n=93);以及“关于”同伴(n=43)。研究结果表明,与同伴模式相关的同伴、标题和术语种类繁多。这些模式在研究项目中的使用和实施方式不一致。大多数文章使用就业同伴模式,而只有少数文章让同伴参与项目的所有阶段。本文献综述的结果有助于理解同伴模式的使用、开发和演变。我们强调了同伴模式对同伴、他们的社区和社区参与工作的潜在益处,并为未来实施同伴模式提出了建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验