DiCorcia Jennifer A, Snidman Nancy C, Tronick Ed
Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, United States.
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 20;9:128. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00128. eCollection 2018.
Although much is known about early memory development, only a few studies have explored infants' memory of social stress. While these few studies suggest that infants can remember stressful interactions, limitations seen in both methodology and statistical analyses give pause. In the current study, 4-month-olds and their mothers participated in both stressful and non-stressful interactions over 2 days. On Day 1, memory group infants participated in the double Face-to-Face Still-Face (FFSF) paradigm and control group infants participated in typical play. Both groups experienced the double FFSF paradigm on Day 2. Memory group infants exhibited the standard SF response but no differences in infant cortisol on Day 1. Both infant groups exhibited the standard SF response on Day 2. However, infants in the memory group, who saw the FFSF paradigm for the second time, did not demonstrate changes in cortisol or behavior indicative of memory across the 2 days. There was also no relationship between changes in cortisol and behavior for both days. The findings question the use of salivary cortisol as a measure of social stress and suggest that, although 4-month-olds reacted to the Still-Face social stressor immediately, they did not remember the following day.
尽管我们对早期记忆发展已经了解很多,但只有少数研究探讨了婴儿对社会压力的记忆。虽然这少数研究表明婴儿能够记住有压力的互动,但在方法和统计分析方面存在的局限性令人深思。在当前的研究中,4个月大的婴儿及其母亲在两天内参与了有压力和无压力的互动。在第1天,记忆组的婴儿参与了双面对面静止脸(FFSF)范式,而对照组的婴儿参与了典型的游戏。两组在第2天都经历了双FFSF范式。记忆组的婴儿在第1天表现出标准的静止脸反应,但婴儿皮质醇水平没有差异。两组婴儿在第2天都表现出标准的静止脸反应。然而,记忆组中第二次看到FFSF范式的婴儿在这两天内并没有表现出皮质醇或行为上的变化,表明他们没有记忆。两天内皮质醇变化与行为之间也没有关系。这些发现对将唾液皮质醇用作社会压力指标提出了质疑,并表明,尽管4个月大的婴儿会立即对静止脸社会压力源做出反应,但他们第二天并没有记住。