• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同毒力的非洲猪瘟病毒(ASFV)L60 和 NHV 在巨噬宿主细胞中对 I 型干扰素信号的调节。

Modulation of type I interferon signaling by African swine fever virus (ASFV) of different virulence L60 and NHV in macrophage host cells.

机构信息

Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon, Avenida da Universidade Técnica, 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal.

出版信息

Vet Microbiol. 2018 Mar;216:132-141. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.02.008. Epub 2018 Feb 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.02.008
PMID:29519508
Abstract

ASFV causes an important disease of domestic swine and wild boar. Currently no vaccine is available, highlighting the necessity to understand ASFV modulation of innate immune responses in natural host cells. With this aim, macrophage cultures enriched in SWC9 and CD163 differentiation markers were infected in parallel with high virulent ASFV/L60 and low virulent ASFV/NHV, the latter lacking MGF 360 and 505/530 genes associated with type I interferon (IFN I) control. IFN I production and signaling were studied after completion of the viral cycles. None of the viruses increased IFN I production in host cells, and accordingly, didn't cause activation of the central mediator of the pathway IRF3. However, upon stimulation by poly:IC treatment during infections, L60 and NHV similarly inhibited IFN I production. This didn't seem to depend on IRF3 modulation since its activation levels were not significantly decreased in L60 infection and were even increased in NHV's, in comparison to stimulated mock infections. The infections didn't evidently activate JAK-STAT pathway mediators STAT1 and STAT2, but did increase expression of interferon stimulated genes (ISGs), to higher levels in NHV than L60 infection. Interestingly, in presence of IFN-α, L60 but not NHV was able to decrease significantly the expression of some of the ISGs tested. Overall, both L60 and NHV were able to inhibit IFN I production in macrophages, through a mechanism not dependent on IRF3 modulation. The high virulent isolate showed however a more effective control of the downstream ISGs expression pathway.

摘要

ASFV 引起家猪和野猪的重要疾病。目前尚无可用的疫苗,这突出表明有必要了解 ASFV 对天然宿主细胞固有免疫反应的调节。为此,用高毒力 ASFV/L60 和低毒力 ASFV/NHV 平行感染富含 SWC9 和 CD163 分化标志物的巨噬细胞培养物,后者缺乏与 I 型干扰素 (IFN I) 控制相关的 MGF 360 和 505/530 基因。病毒周期完成后研究了 IFN I 的产生和信号转导。没有一种病毒能增加宿主细胞中的 IFN I 产生,因此不会导致该途径的中心介质 IRF3 的激活。然而,在用 poly:IC 处理刺激感染时,L60 和 NHV 同样抑制了 IFN I 的产生。这似乎并不依赖于 IRF3 的调节,因为 L60 感染中其激活水平没有显著降低,而在 NHV 中甚至增加,与刺激的模拟感染相比。感染并未明显激活 JAK-STAT 途径介质 STAT1 和 STAT2,但确实增加了干扰素刺激基因 (ISGs) 的表达,在 NHV 中的表达水平高于 L60 感染。有趣的是,在 IFN-α存在下,L60 但不是 NHV 能够显著降低所测试的一些 ISGs 的表达。总体而言,L60 和 NHV 均能够抑制巨噬细胞中 IFN I 的产生,其机制不依赖于 IRF3 的调节。然而,高毒力分离株对下游 ISGs 表达途径的控制更为有效。

相似文献

1
Modulation of type I interferon signaling by African swine fever virus (ASFV) of different virulence L60 and NHV in macrophage host cells.不同毒力的非洲猪瘟病毒(ASFV)L60 和 NHV 在巨噬宿主细胞中对 I 型干扰素信号的调节。
Vet Microbiol. 2018 Mar;216:132-141. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.02.008. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
2
African Swine Fever Virus Armenia/07 Virulent Strain Controls Interferon Beta Production through the cGAS-STING Pathway.非洲猪瘟病毒亚美尼亚/07 强毒株通过 cGAS-STING 通路抑制干扰素β的产生。
J Virol. 2019 May 29;93(12). doi: 10.1128/JVI.02298-18. Print 2019 Jun 15.
3
Expression at mRNA level of cytokines and A238L gene in porcine blood-derived macrophages infected in vitro with African swine fever virus (ASFV) isolates of different virulence.体外感染不同毒力非洲猪瘟病毒(ASFV)毒株的猪血液来源巨噬细胞中细胞因子和A238L基因的mRNA水平表达
Arch Virol. 2003 Nov;148(11):2077-97. doi: 10.1007/s00705-003-0182-x.
4
Apoptosis in porcine macrophages infected in vitro with African swine fever virus (ASFV) strains with different virulence.体外感染不同毒力非洲猪瘟病毒(ASFV)毒株的猪巨噬细胞中的细胞凋亡
Arch Virol. 2009;154(9):1441-50. doi: 10.1007/s00705-009-0466-x. Epub 2009 Aug 6.
5
The low-virulent African swine fever virus (ASFV/NH/P68) induces enhanced expression and production of relevant regulatory cytokines (IFNalpha, TNFalpha and IL12p40) on porcine macrophages in comparison to the highly virulent ASFV/L60.与高致病性非洲猪瘟病毒(ASFV/L60)相比,低致病性非洲猪瘟病毒(ASFV/NH/P68)可诱导猪巨噬细胞上相关调节性细胞因子(IFNα、TNFα和IL12p40)的表达和产生增强。
Arch Virol. 2008;153(10):1845-54. doi: 10.1007/s00705-008-0196-5. Epub 2008 Sep 12.
6
MGF360-9L Is a Major Virulence Factor Associated with the African Swine Fever Virus by Antagonizing the JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway.MGF360-9L 是一种主要的毒力因子,通过拮抗 JAK/STAT 信号通路与非洲猪瘟病毒有关。
mBio. 2022 Feb 22;13(1):e0233021. doi: 10.1128/mbio.02330-21. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
7
African Swine Fever Virus E120R Protein Inhibits Interferon Beta Production by Interacting with IRF3 To Block Its Activation.非洲猪瘟病毒 E120R 蛋白通过与 IRF3 相互作用抑制干扰素 β 的产生来阻断其激活。
J Virol. 2021 Aug 25;95(18):e0082421. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00824-21.
8
Identification and utility of innate immune system evasion mechanisms of ASFV.鉴定和利用 ASFV 的先天免疫系统逃避机制。
Virus Res. 2013 Apr;173(1):87-100. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2012.10.013. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
9
African Swine Fever Virus Georgia Isolate Harboring Deletions of MGF360 and MGF505 Genes Is Attenuated in Swine and Confers Protection against Challenge with Virulent Parental Virus.携带MGF360和MGF505基因缺失的非洲猪瘟病毒格鲁吉亚分离株在猪中减毒,并能抵御强毒亲本病毒的攻击。
J Virol. 2015 Jun;89(11):6048-56. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00554-15. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
10
Sensitivity of African swine fever virus to type I interferon is linked to genes within multigene families 360 and 505.非洲猪瘟病毒对I型干扰素的敏感性与多基因家族360和505中的基因相关。
Virology. 2016 Jun;493:154-61. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2016.03.019. Epub 2016 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Highly suitable LFBK cells for African swine fever virus replication and type I interferon-induced immune studies.非常适合用于非洲猪瘟病毒复制及I型干扰素诱导免疫研究的LFBK细胞。
Vet Res. 2025 Jun 11;56(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s13567-025-01543-7.
2
Inhibition of STING-mediated type I IFN signaling by African swine fever virus DP71L.非洲猪瘟病毒DP71L对STING介导的I型干扰素信号传导的抑制作用。
Vet Res. 2025 Feb 4;56(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13567-025-01474-3.
3
Comprehensive Characterization of the Genetic Landscape of African Swine Fever Virus: Insights into Infection Dynamics, Immunomodulation, Virulence and Genes with Unknown Function.
非洲猪瘟病毒遗传图谱的全面表征:对感染动态、免疫调节、毒力及功能未知基因的深入了解
Animals (Basel). 2024 Jul 26;14(15):2187. doi: 10.3390/ani14152187.
4
African swine fever virus B175L inhibits the type I interferon pathway by targeting STING and 2'3'-cGAMP.非洲猪瘟病毒 B175L 通过靶向 STING 和 2'3'-cGAMP 抑制 I 型干扰素通路。
J Virol. 2023 Nov 30;97(11):e0079523. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00795-23. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
5
African swine fever virus pA104R protein acts as a suppressor of type I interferon signaling.非洲猪瘟病毒pA104R蛋白作为I型干扰素信号的抑制剂。
Front Microbiol. 2023 Apr 6;14:1169699. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1169699. eCollection 2023.
6
Antagonisms of ASFV towards Host Defense Mechanisms: Knowledge Gaps in Viral Immune Evasion and Pathogenesis.ASFV 对宿主防御机制的拮抗作用:病毒免疫逃避和发病机制中的知识空白。
Viruses. 2023 Feb 19;15(2):574. doi: 10.3390/v15020574.
7
African Swine Fever Virus MGF505-7R Interacts with Interferon Regulatory Factor 9 to Evade the Type I Interferon Signaling Pathway and Promote Viral Replication.非洲猪瘟病毒 MGF505-7R 与干扰素调节因子 9 相互作用,逃避 I 型干扰素信号通路并促进病毒复制。
J Virol. 2023 Mar 30;97(3):e0197722. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01977-22. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
8
Modulation of Host Antiviral Innate Immunity by African Swine Fever Virus: A Review.非洲猪瘟病毒对宿主抗病毒天然免疫的调节:综述
Animals (Basel). 2022 Oct 26;12(21):2935. doi: 10.3390/ani12212935.
9
New Insights in the Interplay Between African Swine Fever Virus and Innate Immunity and Its Impact on Viral Pathogenicity.非洲猪瘟病毒与天然免疫相互作用的新见解及其对病毒致病性的影响
Front Microbiol. 2022 Jul 6;13:958307. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.958307. eCollection 2022.
10
African Swine Fever Virus Structural Protein p17 Inhibits cGAS-STING Signaling Pathway Through Interacting With STING.非洲猪瘟病毒结构蛋白 p17 通过与 STING 相互作用抑制 cGAS-STING 信号通路。
Front Immunol. 2022 Jul 1;13:941579. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.941579. eCollection 2022.