Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Biomedical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Philadelphia, PA.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Jan;4(1):59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
Bipolar voltage mapping, as part of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, is traditionally performed in a point-by-point (PBP) approach using single-tip ablation catheters. Alternative techniques for fibrosis-delineation include fast-anatomical mapping (FAM) with multi-electrode circular catheters, and late gadolinium-enhanced magnetic-resonance imaging (LGE-MRI). The correlation between PBP, FAM, and LGE-MRI fibrosis assessment is unknown.
In this study, we examined AF substrate using different modalities (PBP, FAM, and LGE-MRI mapping) in patients presenting for an AF ablation.
LGE-MRI was performed pre-ablation in 26 patients (73% males, age 63±8years). Local image-intensity ratio (IIR) was used to normalize myocardial intensities. PBP- and FAM-voltage maps were acquired, in sinus rhythm, prior to ablation and co-registered to LGE-MRI.
Mean bipolar voltage for all 19,087 FAM voltage points was 0.88±1.27mV and average IIR was 1.08±0.18. In an adjusted mixed-effects model, each unit increase in local IIR was associated with 57% decrease in bipolar voltage (p<0.0001). IIR of >0.74 corresponded to bipolar voltage <0.5 mV. A total of 1554 PBP-mapping points were matched to the nearest FAM-point. In an adjusted mixed-effects model, log-FAM bipolar voltage was significantly associated with log-PBP bipolar voltage (ß=0.36, p<0.0001). At low-voltages, FAM-mapping distribution was shifted to the left compared to PBP-mapping; at intermediate voltages, FAM and PBP voltages were overlapping; and at high voltages, FAM exceeded PBP-voltages.
LGE-MRI, FAM and PBP-mapping show good correlation in delineating electro-anatomical AF substrate. Each approach has fundamental technical characteristics, the awareness of which allows proper assessment of atrial fibrosis.
双极电压标测作为心房颤动(AF)消融的一部分,传统上采用单点消融导管进行逐点(PBP)方法。纤维化描绘的替代技术包括使用多电极环形导管的快速解剖标测(FAM)和钆延迟增强磁共振成像(LGE-MRI)。PBP、FAM 和 LGE-MRI 纤维化评估之间的相关性尚不清楚。
在这项研究中,我们检查了在接受 AF 消融的患者中使用不同模式(PBP、FAM 和 LGE-MRI 映射)的 AF 底物。
在 26 名患者(73%男性,年龄 63±8 岁)中进行消融前 LGE-MRI。使用局部图像强度比(IIR)归一化心肌强度。在消融前窦性心律期间获取 PBP 和 FAM 电压图,并与 LGE-MRI 进行配准。
所有 19087 个 FAM 电压点的平均双极电压为 0.88±1.27mV,平均 IIR 为 1.08±0.18。在调整后的混合效应模型中,局部 IIR 每增加一个单位,双极电压就会降低 57%(p<0.0001)。IIR>0.74 对应于双极电压<0.5 mV。总共匹配了 1554 个 PBP 映射点到最近的 FAM 点。在调整后的混合效应模型中,log-FAM 双极电压与 log-PBP 双极电压显著相关(β=0.36,p<0.0001)。在低电压下,FAM 映射分布与 PBP 映射相比向左偏移;在中等电压下,FAM 和 PBP 电压重叠;在高电压下,FAM 超过 PBP 电压。
LGE-MRI、FAM 和 PBP 映射在描绘电解剖 AF 底物方面具有良好的相关性。每种方法都具有基本的技术特征,了解这些特征可以对心房纤维化进行适当评估。