University of the Balearic Islands, Palma (Balearic Islands), Spain.
Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2019 Jan;47(1):47-58. doi: 10.1007/s10802-018-0415-9.
Limited prosocial emotions (LPE, also referred to as callous-unemotional [CU] traits) are considered to reflect a more trait- than state-like construct. Our first objective was to determine the amount true score variance in CU/LPE that was consistent (trait consistency) over two occasions (12-month interval) of measurement versus specific (occasion-specificity) to each occasion. Our second objective was to determine the convergent validity of the consistent (trait) and occasion-specific (state) variance in CU/LPE symptom ratings within and across settings. Mothers, fathers, primary teachers, and ancillary teachers rated the CU/LPE symptoms in sample of 811 Spanish children (55% boys) on two occasions (i.e., end of first and second grades). CU/LPE symptom ratings showed more trait consistency than occasion-specificity for mothers and fathers, slightly more occasion-specificity than trait consistency for primary teachers, and much more occasion-specificity than trait consistency for ancillary teachers. Convergent validity for trait consistency was strong for fathers with mothers but weaker for primary with ancillary teachers. There was essentially no convergent validity for either trait consistency or occasion-specificity across home and school settings. CU/LPE symptom ratings within this age range represented a more trait-like construct for mothers and fathers and more state-like construct for primary teachers and ancillary teachers. In contrast, earlier studies showed ADHD and ODD ratings to be trait-like within and across home and school. The study of CU/LPE in young children should therefore include multiple sources in multiple settings across occasions to better understand the consistent and occasion-specific nature of the CU/LPE construct.
有限的亲社会情绪(LPE,也称为冷酷无情[CU]特征)被认为反映了一种更倾向于特质而非状态的结构。我们的第一个目标是确定 CU/LPE 中具有一致性(特质一致性)的真实分数方差量,这种一致性是指在两次测量(12 个月的间隔)中相对于特定(特定场合)的测量。我们的第二个目标是确定 CU/LPE 症状评分在个体和跨环境中的一致性(特质)和特定场合(状态)方差的会聚有效性。母亲、父亲、小学教师和辅助教师在两个时间点(即一年级和二年级结束时)对 811 名西班牙儿童(55%为男孩)的 CU/LPE 症状进行了评分。CU/LPE 症状评分在母亲和父亲中表现出更多的特质一致性,而在小学教师中则略多一些特定场合的特异性,而在辅助教师中则多得多。对于父亲来说,特质一致性的会聚有效性很强,但对于小学教师和辅助教师来说,与辅助教师的一致性则较弱。无论是特质一致性还是特定场合的特异性,在家庭和学校环境中都没有本质上的会聚有效性。在这个年龄段内,CU/LPE 症状评分对于母亲和父亲来说代表了一种更倾向于特质的结构,而对于小学教师和辅助教师来说则代表了一种更倾向于状态的结构。相比之下,早期的研究表明 ADHD 和 ODD 评分在家庭和学校内部和之间都是特质的。因此,在对幼儿进行 CU/LPE 的研究中,应该在多个场合从多个来源进行,以更好地理解 CU/LPE 结构的一致性和特定场合的性质。