Suppr超能文献

sluggish 认知迟钝在不同场合、来源和环境下的一致性如何?来自潜在状态-特质建模的证据。

How Consistent Is Sluggish Cognitive Tempo Across Occasions, Sources, and Settings? Evidence From Latent State-Trait Modeling.

机构信息

1 Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.

2 Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA.

出版信息

Assessment. 2019 Jan;26(1):99-110. doi: 10.1177/1073191116686178. Epub 2017 Jan 8.

Abstract

Research has yet to determine how much of the variance in sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT) symptom ratings is consistent across occasions, sources, and settings versus specific to occasion, source, and setting. Our first objective was to determine the amount of variance in SCT ratings that was consistent ( trait consistency) across three occasions of measurement over 12 months versus specific to the occasion ( occasion-specificity) with ratings by mothers, fathers, primary teachers, and secondary teachers of 811 Spanish children. Our second objective was then to determine the convergent validity for trait consistency and occasion-specificity variance components within and across settings. SCT ratings reflected mostly trait consistency for mothers, fathers, and primary teachers (less so for secondary teachers) with the convergent validity for trait consistency also being strong for mothers with fathers and for primary teachers with secondary teachers. Across home and school, however, convergent validity for trait consistency was low and even lower for occasion-specificity. SCT appears to be more trait-like rather than state-like, with similar levels of trait consistency across occasions and convergent validity within settings as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms in a prior study. However, SCT symptoms had slightly weaker convergent validity for trait consistency across settings relative to ADHD symptoms.

摘要

研究尚未确定在多长时间内,迟钝认知节奏(SCT)症状评分的变化在不同场合、来源和环境中是一致的,还是特定于场合、来源和环境的。我们的第一个目标是确定在 12 个月的三个测量时间点上,SCT 评分的一致性(特质一致性)与特定于场合的评分(场合特异性)之间的差异,共有 811 名西班牙儿童的母亲、父亲、小学教师和中学教师进行了评分。然后,我们的第二个目标是确定特质一致性和场合特异性变异分量在不同环境内和之间的会聚有效性。SCT 评分主要反映了母亲、父亲和小学教师的特质一致性(中学教师的一致性稍差),母亲与父亲以及小学教师与中学教师之间的特质一致性的会聚有效性也很强。然而,在家庭和学校中,特质一致性的会聚有效性较低,场合特异性的会聚有效性甚至更低。SCT 似乎更具特质性,而不是状态性,与先前研究中的注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)症状一样,在不同场合具有相似水平的特质一致性。然而,与 ADHD 症状相比,SCT 症状在跨环境的特质一致性方面的会聚有效性稍弱。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
Validity of Sluggish Cognitive Tempo in Turkish Children and Adolescents.《迟钝型认知速度在土耳其儿童和青少年中的有效性》。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2021 Apr;52(2):191-199. doi: 10.1007/s10578-020-01110-5. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
8
Systematic Review: Assessment of Sluggish Cognitive Tempo Over the Past Decade.系统综述:过去十年中迟钝认知速度的评估。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021 Jun;60(6):690-709. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2020.10.016. Epub 2020 Nov 6.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验