Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, 150 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Department of Global Health, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Health Policy Plan. 2018 May 1;33(4):564-573. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czy013.
Improving maternal and child nutrition in resource-poor settings requires effective use of limited resources, but priority-setting is constrained by limited information about program costs and impacts, especially for interventions designed to improve diet quality. This study utilized a mixed methods approach to identify, describe and estimate the potential costs and impacts on child dietary intake of 12 nutrition-sensitive programs in Ethiopia, Nigeria and India. These potential interventions included conditional livestock and cash transfers, media and education, complementary food processing and sales, household production and food pricing programs. Components and costs of each program were identified through a novel participatory process of expert regional consultation followed by validation and calibration from literature searches and comparison with actual budgets. Impacts on child diets were determined by estimating of the magnitude of economic mechanisms for dietary change, comprehensive reviews of evaluations and effectiveness for similar programs, and demographic data on each country. Across the 12 programs, total cost per child reached (net present value, purchasing power parity adjusted) ranged very widely: from 0.58 to 2650 USD/year among five programs in Ethiopia; 2.62 to 1919 USD/year among four programs in Nigeria; and 27 to 586 USD/year among three programs in India. When impacts were assessed, the largest dietary improvements were for iron and zinc intakes from a complementary food production program in Ethiopia (increases of 17.7 mg iron/child/day and 7.4 mg zinc/child/day), vitamin A intake from a household animal and horticulture production program in Nigeria (335 RAE/child/day), and animal protein intake from a complementary food processing program in Nigeria (20.0 g/child/day). These results add substantial value to the limited literature on the costs and dietary impacts of nutrition-sensitive interventions targeting children in resource-limited settings, informing policy discussions and serving as critical inputs to future cost-effectiveness analyses focusing on disease outcomes.
改善资源匮乏环境下的母婴营养状况需要有效利用有限的资源,但由于对项目成本和影响的信息有限,优先排序受到限制,特别是对于旨在改善饮食质量的干预措施。本研究采用混合方法,确定、描述和估计了 12 种在埃塞俄比亚、尼日利亚和印度具有营养敏感性的方案对儿童饮食摄入的潜在成本和影响。这些潜在的干预措施包括有条件的牲畜和现金转移、媒体和教育、补充食品加工和销售、家庭生产和食品定价方案。通过专家区域协商的新参与式程序确定了每个方案的组成部分和成本,然后通过文献检索和与实际预算的比较进行验证和校准。通过估计饮食变化的经济机制的幅度、对类似方案的综合评估和有效性,以及每个国家的人口统计数据,来确定对儿童饮食的影响。在这 12 个方案中,每个儿童的总成本(按现价、购买力平价调整)差异很大:在埃塞俄比亚的 5 个方案中,从 0.58 美元到 2650 美元/年不等;在尼日利亚的 4 个方案中,从 2.62 美元到 1919 美元/年不等;在印度的 3 个方案中,从 27 美元到 586 美元/年不等。在评估影响时,埃塞俄比亚的一项补充食品生产方案对铁和锌的摄入量的改善最大(儿童每天的铁摄入量增加 17.7 毫克,锌摄入量增加 7.4 毫克),尼日利亚的一项家庭动物和园艺生产方案对维生素 A 的摄入量的改善最大(儿童每天的视黄醇当量摄入量增加 335),以及尼日利亚的一项补充食品加工方案对动物蛋白的摄入量的改善最大(儿童每天增加 20.0 克)。这些结果为资源有限环境下针对儿童的营养敏感干预措施的成本和饮食影响的有限文献提供了重要补充,为政策讨论提供了信息,并为今后侧重于疾病结果的成本效益分析提供了关键投入。