Suppr超能文献

患者对门诊就诊表中关于性取向和性别认同问题的接受程度:一项实用随机多中心试验。

Patient Acceptance of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Questions on Intake Forms in Outpatient Clinics: A Pragmatic Randomized Multisite Trial.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychology and Division of General Internal Medicine at Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905.

Center for Regenerative Medicine at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct;53(5):3790-3808. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12843. Epub 2018 Mar 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To (1) test whether patient attitudes toward intake forms at three Midwestern outpatient clinics are significantly more negative among those who are asked to complete SOGI questions versus those who are not; and (2) gain an in-depth understanding of patient concerns about SOGI questions.

STUDY SETTING

Data were collected between 6/29/2015 and 2/29/2016 from new patients (N = 491) who presented at three outpatient clinics in a large academic medical center. This study was originally a quality improvement project, and later, institutional review board approval was obtained for secondary data analysis.

STUDY DESIGN

Two-stage mixed-methods study. (1) Experimental: New patients at three sites were randomly assigned to complete either routine intake forms (control) or routine intake forms with SOGI questions (experimental); and (2) qualitative: interviews with patients who responded negatively to SOGI questions.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

There were no significant differences in patient attitudes between experimental and control groups (p > .05). Of those who received SOGI questions, only 3 percent reported being distressed, upset, or offended by the SOGI questions.

CONCLUSIONS

Collection of SOGI data as a part of the routine clinical patient intake process is not distressing to 97 percent of patients who are heterosexual, cisgender, and older than 50 years.

摘要

目的

(1)测试在中西部三家门诊诊所中,要求患者填写 SOGI 问题与不要求患者填写 SOGI 问题时,患者对入组表格的态度是否存在显著差异;(2)深入了解患者对 SOGI 问题的担忧。

研究地点

本研究数据于 2015 年 6 月 29 日至 2016 年 2 月 29 日期间在一家大型学术医疗中心的三家门诊诊所收集,共纳入 491 名新患者。该研究最初为一项质量改进项目,后获得机构审查委员会批准,对其进行了二次数据分析。

研究设计

两阶段混合方法研究。(1)实验部分:三家诊所的新患者被随机分配填写常规入组表格(对照组)或常规入组表格加 SOGI 问题(实验组);(2)定性部分:对拒绝 SOGI 问题的患者进行访谈。

主要发现

实验组和对照组患者的态度无显著差异(p>.05)。在接受 SOGI 问题的患者中,仅有 3%的患者表示对 SOGI 问题感到困扰、不安或冒犯。

结论

在异性恋、顺性别、年龄大于 50 岁的患者中,将 SOGI 数据作为常规临床入组流程的一部分进行收集,不会令 97%的患者感到困扰。

相似文献

8
Trends in Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Collection.性取向和性别认同数据收集趋势。
Med Care. 2024 Sep 1;62(9):612-616. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002036. Epub 2024 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

10
Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.定性内容分析的三种方法。
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验