Fujimoto Daisaku, Muguruma Naoki, Okamoto Koichi, Fujino Yasuteru, Kagemoto Kaizo, Okada Yasuyuki, Takaoka Yoshifumi, Mitsui Yasuhiro, Kitamura Shinji, Kimura Tetsuo, Miyamoto Hiroshi, Bando Yoshimi, Sonoda Tomoko, Takayama Tetsuji
Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan.
Division of Pathology, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima, Japan.
Endosc Int Open. 2018 Mar;6(3):E322-E334. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-124469. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
Although new image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE) technologies such as blue laser imaging (BLI), BLI-bright, and linked color imaging (LCI) have been developed, their utility for the detection of sessile serrated adenoma/polyps (SSA/Ps) is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of BLI, BLI-bright, and LCI for SSA/P detection in still image examinations and in a prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT).
A group of 6 expert and non-expert endoscopists read 200 endoscopic still images containing SSA/P lesions using white light image (WLI), BLI, BLI-bright, and LCI. Color differences were calculated using the color space method. A prospective RCT of tandem colonoscopy with WLI and LCI was performed. Patients with SSA/P and those with a history of SSA/P that had been endoscopically removed were enrolled and randomly allocated to WLI-LCI or LCI-WLI groups. Additional endoscopic detection rates for SSA/P were compared between the 2 groups.
LCI showed the highest SSA/P detection rate among the 4 modes for both expert and non-expert endoscopists. The detection rate with LCI for the 6 expert endoscopists (mean 98.3 ± standard deviation 2.0 %) was significantly higher than that with WLI (86.7 ± 6.0 %, < 0.01). Likewise, the detection rate with LCI for the 6 non-expert endoscopists (92.3 ± 2.9 %) was significantly higher than that with WLI (72.7 ± 11.5 %, < 0.01). The color difference of SSA/P with LCI was the highest among the 4 modes, and was significantly higher than with WLI (median 15.9, (interquartile range 13.7 - 20.6) vs. 10.2, (7.6 - 14.2); < 0.0001). In the RCT, a total of 44 patients (WLI-LCI 22 vs. LCI-WLI 22) underwent colonoscopy. The additional detection rate for SSA/P in the second inspection in the WLI-LCI group (21.6 %, 8/37) was significantly higher than in the LCI-WLI group (3.2 %, 1/31; = 0.02). The small, flat, non-mucus and isochromatic SSA/Ps in the transverse colon were detected more frequently in the second inspection with LCI.
LCI was the most sensitive mode for SSA/P detection among WLI, BLI, BLI-bright, and LCI in the still image examinations. Our RCT strongly suggests that LCI is superior to conventional WLI for SSA/P detection during colonoscopy. UMIN000017599.
尽管已开发出诸如蓝光成像(BLI)、亮蓝光成像(BLI-bright)和联动成像(LCI)等新型图像增强内镜检查(IEE)技术,但其在无蒂锯齿状腺瘤/息肉(SSA/P)检测中的效用仍不明确。本研究旨在评估BLI、BLI-bright和LCI在静态图像检查及前瞻性随机对照试验(RCT)中对SSA/P检测的效用。
一组由专家和非专家组成的6名内镜医师使用白光图像(WLI)、BLI、BLI-bright和LCI阅读200张包含SSA/P病变在内的内镜静态图像。采用颜色空间法计算颜色差异。进行了一项WLI与LCI串联结肠镜检查的前瞻性RCT研究纳入了患有SSA/P以及有内镜下切除SSA/P病史的患者,并将其随机分配至WLI-LCI组或LCI-WLI组。比较两组间SSA/P的额外内镜检出率。
对于专家和非专家内镜医师而言LCI在4种模式中均显示出最高SSA/P检出率。6名专家内镜医师使用LCI的检出率(平均98.3±标准差2.0%)显著高于使用WLI者(86.7±标准差6.0%,P< 0.0 1)。同样,6名非专家内镜医师使用LCI检出率(9 2.3±2.9%)显著高于使用WLI者(72.7±11.5 %,P<0. 01)。在4种模式中SSA/P采用LCI时的颜色差异最大,且显著高于使用WLI时(中位数15.9,四分位间距范围13.7 - 20.6)对比(10.2,7.6 - 14.2)P< 0.0001). 在RCT中共有44例患者接受结肠镜检查(WLI-LCI组22例,LCI-WLI组22例)。WLI-LCI组第二次检查SSA/P的额外检出率( 21. 6 %,8/37)显著高于LCI-WLI组(3.2% ,1/ 31;P=0.02)。横结肠中的小而扁平、无黏液且颜色均匀一致SSA/P更多见于第二次LCI检查中。
在静态图像检查WLI、BLI、BLI-bright和LCI之中LCI是SSA/P检测最敏感模式我们的RCT有力地表明LCI在结肠镜检查中对SSA/P检测优于传统WLI。UMIN0 000175 99。