• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型超细直径结肠镜在困难插入病例中的应用及安全性:一项回顾性研究。

Usefulness and safety of new ultrasmall-diameter colonoscope for cases with difficult insertion: a retrospective study.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1, Oyaguchi Kami-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610, Japan.

Health Management Center, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 14;14(1):21506. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72689-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-72689-1
PMID:39277678
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11401912/
Abstract

Colonoscopies are widely available, but there are cases where insertion can be difficult, even for experienced endoscopists. EC-760XP/L, a new ultrasmall-diameter long scope, may be useful in such cases. This single-center retrospective study included 39 cases where colonoscope insertion was difficult even when previously conducted by an experienced endoscopist. The primary outcome was the cecal intubation time using EC-760XP/L compared to the time used in a previous examination with a standard scope. The secondary outcomes were the cecum intubation rate, intestinal cleanliness level, adenoma detection rate, polyp detection rate, sedative use rate, occurrence of adverse events, and pain experience. A comparison of cecal intubation times between EC-760XP/L and the standard scope showed that insertion times were significantly lower with EC-760XP/L (9.5 min) compared to the standard scope (19 min) (p < 0.01). The standard scope achieved cecal intubation in 30 cases (76.9%), whereas EC-760XP/L reached the cecum in all cases (p < 0.01). Pain was observed in 3 cases (8.3%) with the EC-760XP/L, which was significantly lower than the 22 cases (56.4%) with the standard scope (p < 0.01). In conclusion, EC-760XP/L proved to be useful in cases where colonoscope insertion was difficult.

摘要

结肠镜检查广泛可用,但在某些情况下,即使是经验丰富的内镜医生也难以插入。EC-760XP/L 是一种新型的超小直径长内镜,在这种情况下可能会很有用。这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了 39 例即使由经验丰富的内镜医生进行也难以插入结肠镜的病例。主要结局是使用 EC-760XP/L 与之前使用标准内镜检查时的盲肠插管时间。次要结局是盲肠插管率、肠道清洁度水平、腺瘤检出率、息肉检出率、镇静剂使用率、不良事件发生率和疼痛体验。EC-760XP/L 与标准内镜相比,盲肠插管时间明显更短(EC-760XP/L 为 9.5 分钟,标准内镜为 19 分钟)(p<0.01)。标准内镜在 30 例(76.9%)中成功插管,而 EC-760XP/L 在所有病例中均到达盲肠(p<0.01)。EC-760XP/L 组有 3 例(8.3%)出现疼痛,明显低于标准内镜组的 22 例(56.4%)(p<0.01)。总之,EC-760XP/L 在结肠镜插入困难的情况下是有用的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/136c/11401912/11e41958b9d3/41598_2024_72689_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/136c/11401912/a626f0e3ce59/41598_2024_72689_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/136c/11401912/11e41958b9d3/41598_2024_72689_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/136c/11401912/a626f0e3ce59/41598_2024_72689_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/136c/11401912/11e41958b9d3/41598_2024_72689_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Usefulness and safety of new ultrasmall-diameter colonoscope for cases with difficult insertion: a retrospective study.新型超细直径结肠镜在困难插入病例中的应用及安全性:一项回顾性研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 14;14(1):21506. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72689-1.
2
Meta-analysis of the performance of ultrathin vs. standard colonoscopes.超薄结肠镜与标准结肠镜性能的Meta分析。
Endoscopy. 2017 Apr;49(4):351-358. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-117110. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
3
Propofol sedation for colonoscopy with a new ultrathin or a standard endoscope: a prospective randomized controlled study.新型超微内镜与标准内镜行结肠镜检查时丙泊酚镇静的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Endoscopy. 2013 Jun;45(6):439-44. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1326270. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
4
Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group.逆行观察设备使用经验对结肠镜检查腺瘤检出率和退镜时间的影响:第三只眼 Retroscope 研究组。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):542-50. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.12.021.
5
Expanding the view of a standard colonoscope with the Third Eye Panoramic cap.使用“第三眼全景帽”扩展标准结肠镜的视野。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Oct 7;21(37):10683-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i37.10683.
6
Ultrathin versus pediatric instruments for colonoscopy in older female patients: A randomized trial.老年女性患者结肠镜检查中超薄器械与儿科器械的比较:一项随机试验。
Dig Endosc. 2017 Mar;29(2):168-174. doi: 10.1111/den.12761. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
7
Comparative study of a responsive insertion technology (RIT) colonoscope versus a variable-stiffness colonoscope.响应式插入技术(RIT)结肠镜与可变硬度结肠镜的对比研究。
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2013 Apr;105(4):208-13. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082013000400005.
8
Intermediate-length colonoscope needs more training duration than long-length colonoscope.中长度结肠镜比长长度结肠镜需要更长的培训时间。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014 Aug;49(8):1007-13. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2013.856465. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
9
A randomized controlled trial of comparison on time and rate of cecal and termianl Ileal intubation according to adult-colonoscope length: intermediate versus long.一项比较根据成人结肠镜长度的盲肠和末端回肠插管时间和速度的随机对照试验:中长型与长型。
J Korean Med Sci. 2014 Jan;29(1):98-105. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.1.98. Epub 2013 Dec 26.
10
Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlled trial.广角结肠镜与标准结肠镜的盲肠插入和退出时间:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Jan;6(1):109-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.10.009. Epub 2007 Dec 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Mining Google Trends data for nowcasting and forecasting colorectal cancer (CRC) prevalence.挖掘谷歌趋势数据以进行结直肠癌(CRC)患病率的即时预报和预测。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2023 Oct 4;9:e1518. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1518. eCollection 2023.
2
What is the best sedation method for high-risk patients such as those with cirrhosis?对于肝硬化等高危患者,最佳的镇静方法是什么?
Dig Endosc. 2023 Nov;35(7):855-856. doi: 10.1111/den.14625. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
3
Impact of an artificial intelligence-aided endoscopic diagnosis system on improving endoscopy quality for trainees in colonoscopy: Prospective, randomized, multicenter study.
人工智能辅助内镜诊断系统对提高结肠镜检查中受训者内镜质量的影响:前瞻性、随机、多中心研究。
Dig Endosc. 2024 Jan;36(1):40-48. doi: 10.1111/den.14573. Epub 2023 May 29.
4
First dose-ranging study of remimazolam in Japanese patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: Phase II investigator-initiated clinical trial.雷米佐仑在日本接受胃肠内镜检查患者中的首次剂量范围研究:Ⅱ期研究者发起的临床试验。
Dig Endosc. 2022 Nov;34(7):1403-1412. doi: 10.1111/den.14365. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
5
Efficacy of a small-caliber colonoscope for pain in female patients during unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized controlled study.小口径结肠镜在未镇静结肠镜检查期间对女性患者疼痛的疗效:一项随机对照研究。
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Jul;9(7):E1055-E1061. doi: 10.1055/a-1464-0780. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
6
Randomised comparison of postpolypectomy surveillance intervals following a two-round baseline colonoscopy: the Japan Polyp Study Workgroup.两轮基线结肠镜检查后息肉切除术后监测间隔的随机对照比较:日本息肉研究工作组
Gut. 2020 Nov 2;70(8):1469-78. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321996.
7
Newly-developed colonoscope (PCF-PQ260L) is useful for patients with difficult colons.新开发的结肠镜(PCF-PQ260L)对结肠病变复杂的患者很有用。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul;30(7):630-635. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2019.18789.
8
Linked color imaging enhances endoscopic detection of sessile serrated adenoma/polyps.联动成像增强了内镜下对无蒂锯齿状腺瘤/息肉的检测。
Endosc Int Open. 2018 Mar;6(3):E322-E334. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-124469. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
9
Inadequate Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores predict the risk of missed neoplasia on the next colonoscopy.Boston 肠道准备评分不足预示着下一次结肠镜检查中漏诊肿瘤的风险。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar;87(3):744-751. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
10
Correlation between adenoma detection rate and novel quality indicators for screening colonoscopy. A proposal for quality measures tool kit.腺瘤检出率与结肠镜筛查新质量指标之间的相关性。质量衡量工具包提案。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017 Oct;52(10):1148-1157. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2017.1339827. Epub 2017 Jun 23.