Suppr超能文献

医疗保险优势计划中护理院服务按项目付费对费用分担的影响。

Effects of Caps on Cost Sharing for Skilled Nursing Facility Services in Medicare Advantage Plans.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.

Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 May;66(5):992-997. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15339. Epub 2018 Mar 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate a federal regulation effective in 2011 that limited how much that Medicare Advantage (MA) plans could charge for the first 20 days of care in a skilled nursing facility (SNF).

DESIGN

Difference-in-differences retrospective analysis comparing SNF utilization trends from 2008-2012.

SETTING

Select MA plans.

PARTICIPANTS

Members of 27 plans with mandatory cost sharing reductions (n=132,000) and members of 21 plans without such reductions (n=138,846).

MEASUREMENTS

Mean monthly number of SNF admissions and days per 1,000 members; annual proportion of MA enrollees exiting the plan.

RESULTS

In plans with mandated cost sharing reductions, cost sharing for the first 20 days of SNF care decreased from an average of $2,039 in 2010 to $992 in 2011. In adjusted analyses, plans with mandated cost-sharing reductions averaged 158.1 SNF days (95% confidence interval (CI)=153.2-163.1 days) per 1,000 members per month before the cost sharing cap. This measure increased by 14.3 days (95% CI=3.8-24.8 days, p=0.009) in the 2 years after cap implementation. However, increases in SNF utilization did not significantly differ between plans with and without mandated cost-sharing reductions (adjusted between-group difference: 7.1 days per 1,000 members, 95% CI=-6.5-20.8, p=.30). Disenrollment patterns did not change after the cap took effect.

CONCLUSIONS

When a federal regulation designed to protect MA members from high out-of-pocket costs for postacute care took effect, the use of SNF services did not change.

摘要

目的

评估 2011 年生效的一项联邦法规,该法规限制了医疗保险优势计划(MA)计划在熟练护理设施(SNF)中护理前 20 天的收费金额。

设计

比较 2008 年至 2012 年 SNF 使用趋势的差分差异回顾性分析。

设置

选择 MA 计划。

参与者

27 项计划中有强制性成本分担减少的成员(n=132000)和 21 项计划中没有此类减少的成员(n=138846)。

测量

每月 SNF 入院人数和每 1000 名成员的天数;每年退出计划的 MA 参保人数比例。

结果

在有强制性成本分担减少的计划中,SNF 护理前 20 天的成本分担从 2010 年的平均 2039 美元降至 2011 年的 992 美元。在调整后的分析中,在成本分担上限之前,有强制性成本分担的计划平均每月每 1000 名成员有 158.1 天的 SNF 天数(95%置信区间(CI)=153.2-163.1 天)。在成本上限实施后的 2 年内,这一指标增加了 14.3 天(95%CI=3.8-24.8 天,p=0.009)。然而,在有和没有强制性成本分担的计划之间,SNF 利用率的增加没有显著差异(调整后的组间差异:每 1000 名成员增加 7.1 天,95%CI=-6.5-20.8,p=.30)。在成本上限生效后,退出计划的模式没有改变。

结论

当一项旨在保护 MA 成员免受急性后期护理高额自付费用影响的联邦法规生效时,SNF 服务的使用并未改变。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dc0/5992084/d8f510c9f2cc/nihms958681f1.jpg

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验