Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Plant Pathology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 12;13(3):e0192502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192502. eCollection 2018.
Phylogenetic relationships between thirteen species of downy mildew and 103 species of Phytophthora (plant-pathogenic oomycetes) were investigated with two nuclear and four mitochondrial loci, using several likelihood-based approaches. Three Phytophthora taxa and all downy mildew taxa were excluded from the previously recognized subgeneric clades of Phytophthora, though all were strongly supported within the paraphyletic genus. Downy mildews appear to be polyphyletic, with graminicolous downy mildews (GDM), brassicolous downy mildews (BDM) and downy mildews with colored conidia (DMCC) forming a clade with the previously unplaced Phytophthora taxon totara; downy mildews with pyriform haustoria (DMPH) were placed in their own clade with affinities to the obligate biotrophic P. cyperi. Results suggest the recognition of four additional clades within Phytophthora, but few relationships between clades could be resolved. Trees containing all twenty extant downy mildew genera were produced by adding partial coverage of seventeen additional downy mildew taxa; these trees supported the monophyly of the BDMs, DMCCs and DMPHs but suggested that the GDMs are paraphyletic in respect to the BDMs or polyphyletic. Incongruence between nuclear-only and mitochondrial-only trees suggests introgression may have occurred between several clades, particularly those containing biotrophs, questioning whether obligate biotrophic parasitism and other traits with polyphyletic distributions arose independently or were horizontally transferred. Phylogenetic approaches may be limited in their ability to resolve some of the complex relationships between the "subgeneric" clades of Phytophthora, which include twenty downy mildew genera and hundreds of species.
利用两种核和四种线粒体基因座,通过几种基于似然的方法,研究了 13 种霜霉病菌和 103 种疫霉(植物病原卵菌)之间的系统发育关系。三个疫霉分类群和所有霜霉病菌分类群都被排除在先前被认可的疫霉亚属分类群之外,尽管它们都在半系统发育属内得到了强烈支持。霜霉病菌似乎是多系的,禾草生霜霉病菌(GDM)、十字花科霜霉病菌(BDM)和有色分生孢子霜霉病菌(DMCC)与以前未定位的疫霉分类群 totara 形成一个分支;具有梨形吸器的霜霉病菌(DMPH)与专性生物营养型 P. cyperi 具有亲缘关系,形成自己的分支。结果表明,在疫霉属内需要识别四个额外的分支,但分支之间的关系很少能够解决。通过添加十七个额外的霜霉病菌分类群的部分覆盖,生成了包含所有二十个现存霜霉病菌属的树;这些树支持 BDMs、DMCCs 和 DMPHs 的单系性,但表明 GDMs 在 BDMs 中是并系的或多系的。核基因座和线粒体基因座的树之间的不一致表明,几个分支之间可能发生了基因渗入,特别是那些包含生物营养型的分支,这使得专性生物营养型寄生和其他具有多系分布的特征是独立起源的还是水平转移的产生受到质疑。系统发育方法可能在解决一些“亚属”分类群之间的复杂关系方面存在局限性,这些分类群包括二十个霜霉病菌属和数百个物种。