• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

赋予工科学生伦理风险管理能力:一项实验研究。

Empowering Engineering Students in Ethical Risk Management: An Experimental Study.

机构信息

Department of Management, HEC Montreal, Montreal, QC, H3T 2B1, Canada.

Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Jun;25(3):911-937. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0044-2. Epub 2018 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-018-0044-2
PMID:29532280
Abstract

The complexity of industrial reality, the plurality of legitimate perspectives on risks and the role of emotions in decision-making raise important ethical issues in risk management that are usually overlooked in engineering. Using a questionnaire answered by 200 engineering students from a major engineering school in Canada, the purpose of this study was to assess how their training has influenced their perceptions toward these issues. While our results challenge the stereotypical portrait of the engineer, they also suggest that the current engineering education might fail to empower engineers to engage in ethical risk management. We therefore propose an active-learning method to help in this matter. Carried out through workshops with 34 students in chemical engineering, the effectiveness of this method has been evaluated using group interviews and questionnaires. Our results suggest that such an approach is effective, at least in the short run, to motivate students to engage in ethical risk management and to trigger reflectivity on what it means to be an engineer today.

摘要

工业现实的复杂性、风险的多种合法视角以及决策中的情感作用在风险管理中引发了重要的伦理问题,而这些问题通常在工程学中被忽视。本研究使用了一份由加拿大一所主要工程学校的 200 名工科学生回答的问卷,旨在评估他们的培训如何影响他们对这些问题的看法。虽然我们的结果挑战了工程师的刻板印象,但也表明当前的工程教育可能未能赋予工程师从事伦理风险管理的能力。因此,我们提出了一种主动学习的方法来帮助解决这个问题。通过与 34 名化学工程专业的学生进行研讨会来实施这种方法,并使用小组访谈和问卷调查来评估其效果。我们的结果表明,这种方法至少在短期内是有效的,可以激励学生参与伦理风险管理,并促使他们思考当今工程师的含义。

相似文献

1
Empowering Engineering Students in Ethical Risk Management: An Experimental Study.赋予工科学生伦理风险管理能力:一项实验研究。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Jun;25(3):911-937. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0044-2. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
2
Engineering Ethics Education: A Comparative Study of Japan and Malaysia.工程伦理教育:日本与马来西亚的比较研究。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Aug;25(4):1069-1083. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0051-3. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
3
Taking emotion seriously: meeting students where they are.认真对待情感:在学生所在之处与他们相遇。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Mar;20(1):183-95. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9427-y. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
4
Ethical Risk Management Education in Engineering: A Systematic Review.工程领域的道德风险管理教育:一项系统综述。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Apr;23(2):323-350. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9777-y. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
5
The Roles of Implicit Understanding of Engineering Ethics in Student Teams' Discussion.工程伦理内隐理解在学生团队讨论中的作用。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Dec;23(6):1755-1774. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9856-0. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
6
A Pragmatic Approach to Ethical Decision-Making in Engineering Practice: Characteristics, Evaluation Criteria, and Implications for Instruction and Assessment.工程实践中伦理决策的务实方法:特点、评价标准及对教学和评估的启示。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Jun;23(3):663-679. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9826-6. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
7
A Comparison of the Effects of Ethics Training on International and US Students.道德培训对国际学生和美国学生的影响比较
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Aug;22(4):1217-1244. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9678-5. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
8
Using the Chernobyl incident to teach engineering ethics.利用切尔诺贝利事件进行工程伦理教育。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Jun;19(2):625-40. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9337-4. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
9
Learning about Aboriginal health and wellbeing at the postgraduate level: novel application of the Growth and Empowerment Measure.在研究生阶段了解原住民的健康与福祉:成长与赋权量表的新应用
Rural Remote Health. 2019 Apr;19(2):4708. doi: 10.22605/RRH4708. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
10
Using Insights from Applied Moral Psychology to Promote Ethical Behavior Among Engineering Students and Professional Engineers.运用应用道德心理学的见解促进工科学生和专业工程师的道德行为。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Oct;22(5):1513-1534. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9721-6. Epub 2015 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Emotions in Engineering Ethics Education: Systematic Review and Ways Forward.工程伦理教育中的情感:系统综述与未来方向
Sci Eng Ethics. 2025 Jul 29;31(4):21. doi: 10.1007/s11948-025-00543-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethical Risk Management Education in Engineering: A Systematic Review.工程领域的道德风险管理教育:一项系统综述。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Apr;23(2):323-350. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9777-y. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
2
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.因子数量的碎石检验
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
3
Risk communication, public engagement, and climate change: a role for emotions.风险沟通、公众参与和气候变化:情感的作用。
Risk Anal. 2012 Jun;32(6):1033-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01812.x. Epub 2012 Apr 22.
4
Outcomes assessment of role-play scenarios for teaching responsible conduct of research.角色扮演情景教学中负责任研究行为的效果评估。
Account Res. 2011 Jul-Aug;18(4):217-46. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2011.584760.
5
The contribution of emotion and cognition to moral sensitivity: a neurodevelopmental study.情绪和认知对道德敏感性的贡献:一项神经发育研究。
Cereb Cortex. 2012 Jan;22(1):209-20. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr111. Epub 2011 May 26.
6
Risk and responsibility: a complex and evolving relationship.风险与责任:复杂且不断演变的关系。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2012 Mar;18(1):91-102. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9246-y. Epub 2010 Nov 20.
7
Emotional engineers: toward morally responsible design.情感工程师:走向有道德责任的设计
Sci Eng Ethics. 2012 Mar;18(1):103-15. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9236-0. Epub 2010 Oct 9.
8
Moral responsibility, technology, and experiences of the tragic: from Kierkegaard to offshore engineering.道德责任、技术与悲剧体验:从克尔凯郭尔到海上石油工程。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2012 Mar;18(1):35-48. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9233-3. Epub 2010 Sep 24.
9
Broadening ethics teaching in engineering: beyond the individualistic approach.拓宽工程伦理教学:超越个人主义方法。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Jun;17(2):217-32. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9205-7. Epub 2010 May 14.
10
Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy: the roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions.增强角色广度自我效能感:工作丰富化及其他组织干预措施的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 1998 Dec;83(6):835-52. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.835.