• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用切尔诺贝利事件进行工程伦理教育。

Using the Chernobyl incident to teach engineering ethics.

机构信息

Muskingum University, New Concord, OH, USA.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Jun;19(2):625-40. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9337-4. Epub 2011 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-011-9337-4
PMID:22170503
Abstract

This paper discusses using the Chernobyl Incident as a case study in engineering ethics instruction. Groups of students are asked to take on the role of a faction involved in the Chernobyl disaster and to defend their decisions in a mock debate. The results of student surveys and the Engineering and Science Issues Test indicate that the approach is very popular with students and has a positive impact on moral reasoning. The approach incorporates technical, communication and teamwork skills and has many of the features suggested by recent literature.

摘要

本文探讨了将切尔诺贝利事件作为工程伦理教学案例的应用。要求学生分组扮演参与切尔诺贝利灾难的一方,并在模拟辩论中为自己的决策辩护。学生调查和工程与科学问题测试的结果表明,这种方法非常受学生欢迎,并对道德推理产生了积极影响。该方法结合了技术、沟通和团队合作技能,具有近期文献所提出的许多特点。

相似文献

1
Using the Chernobyl incident to teach engineering ethics.利用切尔诺贝利事件进行工程伦理教育。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Jun;19(2):625-40. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9337-4. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
2
Comparing First-Year Engineering Student Conceptions of Ethical Decision-Making to Performance on Standardized Assessments of Ethical Reasoning.将一年级工科学生的道德决策概念与道德推理标准化评估表现进行比较。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Jun 4;30(3):23. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00488-y.
3
The Engineering and Science Issues Test (ESIT): a discipline-specific approach to assessing moral judgment.工程与科学问题测试(ESIT):一种评估道德判断的学科特定方法。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2010 Jun;16(2):387-407. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9148-z. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
4
Teaching ethics to engineers: ethical decision making parallels the engineering design process.向工程师传授伦理学:伦理决策与工程设计过程相似。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Sep;17(3):597-605. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9213-7. Epub 2010 Jun 4.
5
The Roles of Implicit Understanding of Engineering Ethics in Student Teams' Discussion.工程伦理内隐理解在学生团队讨论中的作用。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Dec;23(6):1755-1774. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9856-0. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
6
Teaching engineering ethics to first-year college students.向大学一年级学生讲授工程伦理。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2004 Apr;10(2):359-68. doi: 10.1007/s11948-004-0032-6.
7
Beyond Ethical Frameworks: Using Moral Experimentation in the Engineering Ethics Classroom.超越伦理框架:在工程伦理课堂中运用道德实验
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Dec;21(6):1637-56. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9614-0. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
8
Reasoning Backwards by Design: Commentary on "Moral Reasoning among HEC Members".逆向设计推理:对“人类伦理委员会成员的道德推理”的评论
J Clin Ethics. 2015 Summer;26(2):118-20.
9
Student-inspired activities for the teaching and learning of engineering ethics.以学生为主体的工程伦理教学活动
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Dec;19(4):1455-68. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9297-8. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
10
Can instruction in engineering ethics change students' feelings about professional responsibility?工科伦理教学能否改变学生对职业责任的看法?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2010 Mar;16(1):201-15. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9195-5. Epub 2010 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
A Rubik's Cube-Inspired Pedagogical Tool for Teaching and Learning Engineering Ethics.一个受魔方启发的工程伦理教学工具。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Oct 17;30(6):50. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00506-z.
2
Engineering Students as Co-creators in an Ethics of Technology Course.工科学生在技术伦理课程中的共同创造者。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2021 Jul 23;27(4):48. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00326-5.
3
Are Ethics Training Programs Improving? A Meta-Analytic Review of Past and Present Ethics Instruction in the Sciences.伦理培训项目是否在改进?对科学领域过去和现在的伦理教学的元分析综述。

本文引用的文献

1
Development of role-play scenarios for teaching responsible conduct of research.角色扮演场景的开发用于负责任的研究行为教学。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2010 Sep;16(3):573-89. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9221-7. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
2
Teaching ethics to engineers: ethical decision making parallels the engineering design process.向工程师传授伦理学:伦理决策与工程设计过程相似。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Sep;17(3):597-605. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9213-7. Epub 2010 Jun 4.
3
The Engineering and Science Issues Test (ESIT): a discipline-specific approach to assessing moral judgment.
Ethics Behav. 2017;27(5):351-384. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2016.1182025. Epub 2016 May 27.
4
A Systematic Literature Review of US Engineering Ethics Interventions.美国工程伦理干预措施的系统文献综述
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Apr;24(2):551-583. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9910-6. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
5
A Meta-analytic Comparison of Face-to-Face and Online Delivery in Ethics Instruction: The Case for a Hybrid Approach.面对面与在线伦理教学的元分析比较:混合方法的案例。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Dec;23(6):1719-1754. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9869-3. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
6
Review of Instructional Approaches in Ethics Education.教育伦理教学方法述评。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Jun;23(3):883-912. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9803-0. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
工程与科学问题测试(ESIT):一种评估道德判断的学科特定方法。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2010 Jun;16(2):387-407. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9148-z. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
4
The dilemma of ethics in engineering education.工程教育中的伦理困境。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2004 Apr;10(2):343-51. doi: 10.1007/s11948-004-0030-8.
5
Learning ethics the hard way: facing the ethics committee.以艰难的方式学习伦理道德:面对伦理委员会。
Teach Psychol. 1998;25(1):26-8. doi: 10.1207/s15328023top2501_7.
6
The use of role-play in teaching research ethics: a validation study.角色扮演在研究伦理教学中的应用:一项验证性研究。
Teach Psychol. 1992 Apr;19(2):106-8. doi: 10.1207/s15328023top1902_11.
7
Teaching research ethics through role-play and discussion.通过角色扮演和讨论来教授研究伦理。
Teach Psychol. 1990 Oct;17(3):179-81. doi: 10.1207/s15328023top1703_10.