De Vroey Henri, Staes Filip, Weygers Ive, Vereecke Evie, Vanrenterghem Jos, Deklerck Jan, Van Damme Geert, Hallez Hans, Claeys Kurt
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven Campus Bruges, Spoorwegstraat 12, 8200 Bruges, Belgium.
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Tervuursevest 101, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2018 May;54:22-27. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
The use of inertial measurement units for the evaluation of temporal parameters of gait has been studied in many populations. However, currently no studies support the use of inertial measurement units for this purpose in the knee arthroplasty population. The objective of the present study was to investigate the agreement between an inertial measurement and camera based system for the assessment of temporal gait parameters in a knee arthroplasty population.
Sixteen knee arthroplasty patients performed 3 gait trials at a self-selected speed along a 6 m walk-way. During the gait trials, gyroscope data from shank-worn inertial measurement units and motion data from optoelectronic cameras were collected simultaneously. A custom-made peak detection algorithm was used to identify gait events from gyroscope data, in order to compute cycle time, stance time and swing time. A marker and coordinate based algorithm was used to calculate temporal gait parameters from kinematical data derived from the camera system. Temporal variables were compared between both methods by calculating intra-class correlation coefficients, mean errors and root mean squared errors. Furthermore, Bland-Altman plots were constructed to assess the agreement between both methods.
Overall good to excellent intra-class correlation values (0.826-0.972) were found. Root mean square errors between both methods ranged from 0.036 to 0.055 s. High levels of agreement were observed for all variables.
These findings suggest that inertial measurement units can be used for outside laboratory assessment (e.g. in a hospital environment) of temporal gait parameters in the knee arthroplasty population.
在许多人群中,已经对使用惯性测量单元评估步态的时间参数进行了研究。然而,目前尚无研究支持在膝关节置换人群中使用惯性测量单元来实现这一目的。本研究的目的是调查在膝关节置换人群中,惯性测量系统与基于摄像头的系统在评估步态时间参数方面的一致性。
16名膝关节置换患者以自我选择的速度沿着6米长的步道进行3次步态试验。在步态试验期间,同时收集来自小腿佩戴的惯性测量单元的陀螺仪数据和来自光电摄像头的运动数据。使用定制的峰值检测算法从陀螺仪数据中识别步态事件,以计算周期时间、站立时间和摆动时间。使用基于标记和坐标的算法从摄像头系统获取的运动学数据中计算步态时间参数。通过计算组内相关系数、平均误差和均方根误差,对两种方法的时间变量进行比较。此外,绘制Bland-Altman图以评估两种方法之间的一致性。
总体上发现组内相关值良好至优秀(0.826 - 0.972)。两种方法之间的均方根误差范围为0.036至0.055秒。所有变量均观察到高度一致性。
这些发现表明,惯性测量单元可用于在实验室外(例如在医院环境中)评估膝关节置换人群的步态时间参数。