• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

服务环境的系统基础与框架:对医疗保健服务未来挑战的思考。

A Systematic Underpinning and Framing of the Servicescape: Reflections on Future Challenges in Healthcare Services.

机构信息

Graduate School of Technology and Innovation Management, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 13;15(3):509. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030509.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph15030509
PMID:29534035
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5877054/
Abstract

Ever since Bitner defined the term "servicescape" as the physical environment in which the service is assembled, several scholars have attempted to better understand the impact of the built environment in the context of different service settings. While servicescape is a topic of increasing academic interest among scholars and practitioners, most studies in the area are dedicated to understanding the built environment of hedonic service. More studies are needed to examine utilitarian servicescape and in this paper, we have focused on the healthcare environment. This study aims to identify the gap in servicescape and healthscape studies by providing a theoretical structure of the current servicescape literature and comprehend the academic differences between hedonic servicescape and utilitarian healthscape studies. After reviewing 44 selected papers based on rigorous criteria, we: (1) framed the servicescape factors; (2) analyzed the servicescape literature from the perspectives of terminologies, research fields, methodologies, and frameworks; and (3) identified the current paths of healthscape research. Through this work, we highlight the significance of adopting different dimensions and factors to evaluate the distinguished service environment by the servicescape type and propose several research agendas for future studies on healthscapes. The research findings can contribute to a deep understanding of healthscapes and can introduce a new viewpoint for interpreting the servicescape in diversified service settings.

摘要

自从 Bitner 将“服务环境”定义为服务组合的物理环境以来,许多学者试图更好地理解建筑环境在不同服务环境中的影响。虽然服务环境是学者和实践者越来越感兴趣的话题,但该领域的大多数研究都致力于理解享乐服务的建筑环境。需要更多的研究来检验功利服务环境,在本文中,我们专注于医疗保健环境。本研究旨在通过提供当前服务环境文献的理论结构,并理解享乐服务环境和功利健康环境研究之间的学术差异,来确定服务环境和健康环境研究中的差距。在根据严格标准审查了 44 篇选定的论文后,我们:(1) 构建了服务环境因素;(2) 从术语、研究领域、方法和框架的角度分析了服务环境文献;(3) 确定了健康环境研究的当前路径。通过这项工作,我们强调了采用不同维度和因素来评估服务环境的重要性,该服务环境由服务环境类型决定,并为未来健康环境研究提出了几个研究议程。研究结果可以帮助我们更深入地理解健康环境,并为在多样化的服务环境中解释服务环境提供一个新的视角。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4640/5877054/245d48bd390d/ijerph-15-00509-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4640/5877054/3eff65f9502f/ijerph-15-00509-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4640/5877054/1f0242bed3b7/ijerph-15-00509-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4640/5877054/245d48bd390d/ijerph-15-00509-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4640/5877054/3eff65f9502f/ijerph-15-00509-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4640/5877054/1f0242bed3b7/ijerph-15-00509-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4640/5877054/245d48bd390d/ijerph-15-00509-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
A Systematic Underpinning and Framing of the Servicescape: Reflections on Future Challenges in Healthcare Services.服务环境的系统基础与框架:对医疗保健服务未来挑战的思考。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 13;15(3):509. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030509.
2
Healthscape role towards customer satisfaction in private healthcare.在私立医疗保健领域,Healthscape在实现客户满意度方面所扮演的角色。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2016 Jul 11;29(6):600-13. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-05-2015-0068.
3
Patient Perceptions of Servicescape in Healthcare: A Systematic Review of the Literature.患者对医疗服务环境的感知:文献系统评价。
J Healthc Manag. 2018 Mar-Apr;63(2):94-104. doi: 10.1097/JHM-D-16-00014.
4
The effect of changes in servicescape and service quality perceptions in a maternity unit.产科病房服务环境变化及服务质量感知的影响
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2011;24(5):389-405. doi: 10.1108/09526861111139205.
5
The influence of servicescape and service credibility on older adults' intention to recover.服务环境和服务可信度对老年人康复意愿的影响。
J Health Organ Manag. 2020 Feb 12;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/JHOM-07-2019-0215.
6
An Ecological Approach to Smart Homes for Health Care Services: Conceptual Framework of a Smart Servicescape Wheel.生态视角下的医疗保健服务智能家居:智能服务景观轮的概念框架。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Feb 8;7(2):e12425. doi: 10.2196/12425.
7
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
8
The Built Environment Influence on Resilient Healthcare: A Systematic Literature Review of Design Knowledge.建筑环境对弹性医疗保健的影响:设计知识的系统文献回顾。
HERD. 2022 Jul;15(3):329-350. doi: 10.1177/19375867221077469. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
9
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
10
Maternity Healthscapes: Conceptualization and Index Development.孕产妇健康景观:概念化与指标制定。
HERD. 2022 Oct;15(4):183-203. doi: 10.1177/19375867221117248. Epub 2022 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing patient satisfaction with practitioner communication: patient-centered care, hospital environment and patient trust in the public hospitals.评估患者对医护人员沟通的满意度:公立医院中的以患者为中心的护理、医院环境及患者信任。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 21;12:1544498. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1544498. eCollection 2025.
2
Determinants of patients' satisfaction and trust toward healthcare service environment in general practice clinics.全科诊所患者对医疗服务环境满意度和信任度的决定因素。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 29;13:856750. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.856750. eCollection 2022.
3
Importance-Performance Matrix Analysis (IPMA) to Evaluate Servicescape Fitness Consumer by Gender and Age.

本文引用的文献

1
From eHealth to iHealth: Transition to Participatory and Personalized Medicine in Mental Health.从电子健康到移动健康:心理健康领域向参与式和个性化医疗的转变。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jan 3;20(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7412.
2
Healthscape role towards customer satisfaction in private healthcare.在私立医疗保健领域,Healthscape在实现客户满意度方面所扮演的角色。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2016 Jul 11;29(6):600-13. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-05-2015-0068.
3
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.
重要表现矩阵分析(IPMA)评估服务场景适应度消费者的性别和年龄差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 9;17(18):6562. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186562.
4
Facilitating Green Supply Chain in Dental Care through Kansei Healthscape of Positive Emotions.通过积极情感的感性健康景观促进牙科保健中的绿色供应链。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 20;16(19):3507. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193507.
5
An Ecological Approach to Smart Homes for Health Care Services: Conceptual Framework of a Smart Servicescape Wheel.生态视角下的医疗保健服务智能家居:智能服务景观轮的概念框架。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Feb 8;7(2):e12425. doi: 10.2196/12425.
系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
4
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目:PRISMA声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):264-9, W64. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
5
Healthscapes: the importance of place.健康环境:场所的重要性。
J Health Care Mark. 1995 Spring;15(1):10-1.
6
Healthscapes: the role of the facility and physical environment on consumer attitudes, satisfaction, quality assessments, and behaviors.健康环境:设施与物理环境对消费者态度、满意度、质量评估及行为的作用。
Health Care Manage Rev. 1995 Spring;20(2):48-61. doi: 10.1097/00004010-199502020-00008.