• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

养老院痴呆症患者护理计划过程中的代表性问题。

Representation in the Care Planning Process for Nursing Home Residents With Dementia.

机构信息

Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI.

Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 May;19(5):415-421. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2018.01.004
PMID:29534863
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5924720/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Federally mandated assessments of nursing home (NH) residents drive individualized care planning. Residents with cognitive impairment may not be able to meaningfully communicate their care needs and preferences during this process-a gap that may be partially addressed by involving surrogates. We describe the prevalence of family participation in the care planning process for long-stay NH residents with varying degrees of cognitive impairment.

DESIGN

Retrospective study using administrative data made available as part of an ongoing pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

A total of 292 NHs from 1 large for-profit NH system.

PARTICIPANTS

Long-stay NH residents in 2016.

MEASUREMENTS

We identified all care planning assessments conducted in 2016 for long-stay NH residents. Cognitive functioning was defined using the Cognitive Function Scale. The Minimum Data Set was used to determine whether a resident, family member, and/or legal guardian participated in the assessment process. Certification and Survey Provider Enhance Reporting system data was used to identify facility-level correlates of family participation. Bivariate and multivariable hierarchical regression results are presented.

RESULTS

The analytic sample included 18,552 long-stay NH residents. Family member/representative participation varied by degree of resident cognitive impairment; 8% of residents with no cognitive impairment had family or representative participation in care planning during 2016, compared with 26% of residents with severe impairment. NHs with more social workers had greater family participation in care planning. Available NH characteristics do not explain most of the variation in family participation between NHs (residual intraclass correlation = .57).

CONCLUSIONS

Only a minority of family members and surrogates participate in NH care planning, even for residents with severe cognitive impairment. The association between social work staffing and participation suggests family involvement may be a measure of quality improvement capacity. Our findings suggest a lack of voice for a vulnerable population that may have implications on the quality of care received at the end of life.

摘要

目的

联邦授权对养老院(NH)居民进行评估,以推动个性化护理计划。有认知障碍的居民在这个过程中可能无法有意义地传达他们的护理需求和偏好——这一差距可以通过引入代理人来部分解决。我们描述了在认知障碍程度不同的长期 NH 居民的护理计划过程中,家属参与的普遍程度。

设计

使用作为正在进行的实用集群随机对照试验的一部分提供的行政数据进行的回顾性研究。

设置

来自 1 个大型营利性 NH 系统的总共 292 个 NH。

参与者

2016 年长期 NH 居民。

测量

我们确定了 2016 年对长期 NH 居民进行的所有护理计划评估。认知功能使用认知功能量表定义。最小数据集用于确定居民、家庭成员和/或法定监护人是否参与评估过程。认证和调查提供者增强报告系统数据用于识别设施层面与家庭参与相关的因素。呈现了单变量和多变量层次回归结果。

结果

分析样本包括 18552 名长期 NH 居民。家庭成员/代表的参与程度因居民认知障碍程度而异;2016 年,没有认知障碍的居民中有 8%的人在护理计划中有家属或代表参与,而严重障碍的居民中有 26%的人有家属或代表参与。有更多社工的 NH 更有可能让家属参与护理计划。现有的 NH 特征并不能解释 NH 之间家庭参与度的大部分差异(残差组内相关系数=0.57)。

结论

只有少数家属和代理人参与 NH 护理计划,即使是对认知障碍严重的居民也是如此。社工人员配备与参与之间的关联表明,家属参与可能是质量改进能力的一个衡量标准。我们的研究结果表明,弱势群体缺乏发言权,这可能对临终关怀的质量产生影响。

相似文献

1
Representation in the Care Planning Process for Nursing Home Residents With Dementia.养老院痴呆症患者护理计划过程中的代表性问题。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 May;19(5):415-421. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
2
Nursing Home Characteristics Associated With Implementation of an Advance Care Planning Video Intervention.与实施预先护理计划视频干预相关的养老院特征。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Jul;20(7):804-809.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.01.133. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
3
Level of Care Preferences Among Nursing Home Residents With Advanced Dementia.养老院中患有晚期痴呆症的居民的护理水平偏好。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Sep;54(3):340-345. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.04.020. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
4
Racial disparity in end-of-life hospitalizations among nursing home residents with dementia.患有痴呆症的养老院居民临终住院方面的种族差异。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Jul;69(7):1877-1886. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17117. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
5
Finding Gertrude: The resident's voice in Minimum Data Set 3.0.寻找格特鲁德:最小数据集3.0中的住院医师声音。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15(11):802-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.01.012. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
6
The Minimum Data Set Agitated and Reactive Behavior Scale: Measuring Behaviors in Nursing Home Residents With Dementia.最小数据集激越和反应行为量表:测量痴呆养老院居民的行为。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Dec;20(12):1548-1552. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.08.030. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
7
Advance care planning in nursing homes: correlates of capacity and possession of advance directives.养老院中的预立医疗照护计划:能力的相关因素及预立医嘱的持有情况
Gerontologist. 2003 Jun;43(3):309-17. doi: 10.1093/geront/43.3.309.
8
Perceptions of Family Decision-makers of Nursing Home Residents With Advanced Dementia Regarding the Quality of Communication Around End-of-Life Care.患有晚期痴呆症的养老院居民的家庭决策者对临终关怀沟通质量的看法。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Oct;19(10):879-883. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.05.015. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
9
Association of Infection-Related Hospitalization With Cognitive Impairment Among Nursing Home Residents.养老院居民中与感染相关的住院与认知障碍的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e217528. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7528.
10
Characteristics Associated with Feeding Tube Placement: Retrospective Cohort Study of Texas Nursing Home Residents with Advanced Dementia.与置管饲管相关的特征:德克萨斯州养老院患有晚期痴呆症居民的回顾性队列研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Jul;22(7):1471-1476.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.10.033. Epub 2020 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Describing the status quo of person-centred dementia care in different types of care units in German nursing homes: A convergent mixed methods study.描述德国养老院不同类型护理单元中以患者为中心的痴呆症护理现状:一项聚合性混合方法研究。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Aug 10;7:100233. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100233. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Nurse-Led Virtual Delivery of PIECES in Canadian Long-Term Care Homes to Support the Care of Older Adults Experiencing Responsive Behaviors During COVID-19: Qualitative Descriptive Study.在加拿大长期护理院中由护士主导的PIECES虚拟服务,以支持在COVID-19期间对出现反应性行为的老年人的护理:定性描述性研究
JMIR Nurs. 2022 Dec 13;5(1):e42731. doi: 10.2196/42731.
3
Pragmatic Trial of Personalized Music for Agitation and Antipsychotic Use in Nursing Home Residents With Dementia.个性化音乐治疗对痴呆养老院患者激越和抗精神病药物使用的实用临床试验
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Jul;23(7):1171-1177. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.12.030. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
4
Reimagining Family Involvement in Residential Long-Term Care.重新构想家庭在住宅长期护理中的参与。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Feb;23(2):235-240. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.12.022. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
5
Interventions promoting family involvement with care homes following placement of a relative with dementia: A systematic review.干预措施促进家庭参与养老院护理:系统综述。
Dementia (London). 2022 Feb;21(2):618-647. doi: 10.1177/14713012211046595. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
6
Measuring the effects of a personalized music intervention on agitated behaviors among nursing home residents with dementia: design features for cluster-randomized adaptive trial.测量个性化音乐干预对养老院痴呆症患者激越行为的影响:群组随机自适应试验的设计特点。
Trials. 2021 Oct 7;22(1):681. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05620-y.
7
Hospice Staff Perspectives on Caring for People with Dementia: A Multisite, Multistakeholder Study.临终关怀工作人员对照顾痴呆症患者的看法:一项多地点、多利益相关者研究。
J Palliat Med. 2020 Aug;23(8):1013-1020. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0565. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
8
Black Nursing Home Residents More Likely to Watch Advance Care Planning Video.黑人养老院居民更有可能观看预先护理计划视频。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Mar;68(3):603-608. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16237. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
9
Measuring Effects of Nondrug Interventions on Behaviors: Music & Memory Pilot Study.测量非药物干预对行为的影响:音乐与记忆初步研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Oct;67(10):2134-2138. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16069. Epub 2019 Jul 13.

本文引用的文献

1
PRagmatic trial Of Video Education in Nursing homes: The design and rationale for a pragmatic cluster randomized trial in the nursing home setting.养老院视频教育的实用试验:养老院环境中实用整群随机试验的设计与原理
Clin Trials. 2017 Apr;14(2):140-151. doi: 10.1177/1740774516685298. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
2
Racial/Ethnic Differences in Caregiving Frequency: Does Immigrant Status Matter?照料频率的种族/民族差异:移民身份是否重要?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2018 Aug 14;73(6):1088-1098. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbw106.
3
The Minimum Data Set 3.0 Cognitive Function Scale.最小数据集3.0认知功能量表。
Med Care. 2017 Sep;55(9):e68-e72. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000334.
4
Vital conversations with family in the nursing home: preparation for end-stage dementia care.养老院中与家人的重要对话:为终末期痴呆症护理做准备。
J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2014;10(2):112-26. doi: 10.1080/15524256.2014.906371.
5
Finding Gertrude: The resident's voice in Minimum Data Set 3.0.寻找格特鲁德:最小数据集3.0中的住院医师声音。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15(11):802-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.01.012. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
6
Quality of end-of-life care of long-term nursing home residents with and without dementia.长期居住在养老院的有痴呆症和无痴呆症患者的临终关怀质量。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Jul;61(7):1066-73. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12330. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
7
Core functions of nursing home social services departments in the United States.美国养老院社会服务部门的核心职能。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Jan;14(1):75.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.09.004. Epub 2012 Nov 3.
8
End-of-life transitions among nursing home residents with cognitive issues.养老院中认知问题患者的临终过渡期。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 29;365(13):1212-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1100347.
9
Nursing home social services directors' opinions about the number of residents they can serve.养老院社会服务主管对其服务的居民人数的看法。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2010 Jan;22(1):33-52. doi: 10.1080/08959420903396426.
10
State variations in nursing home social worker qualifications.养老院社会工作者资质的州际差异。
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2008;51(3-4):379-409. doi: 10.1080/01634370802039734.