Clinical effectiveness of treatment of combined upper thoracic spinal stenosis and multilevel cervical spinal stenosis with different posterior decompression surgeries.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the clinical effectiveness of various posterior decompression surgeries in the treatment of upper thoracic spinal stenosis combined with multilevel cervical spinal stenosis.

METHODS

From January 2010 to December 2015, 22 consecutive patients with combined upper thoracic spinal stenosis and multilevel cervical spinal stenosis were treated with two different approaches of posterior decompression surgeries. In group A with 10 patients, both cervical and thoracic spinal decompression surgeries were performed simultaneously (one-stage surgery); in group B with 8 patients, cervical and thoracic spinal decompression surgeries were performed separately within three months (two-stage surgery). Based on Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, improvement rate and extent of neurological function were calculated and the difference was compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in demographic data between the two groups. However, compared with those of group B, both short-term and long-term improvement rate of neurological function in group A was higher (P < 0.05). In addition, the hospitalization cost was also lower in group A.

CONCLUSION

Both one-stage and two-stage posterior decompression surgeries were effective in treating patient with upper thoracic spinal stenosis combined with multilevel cervical spinal stenosis; however, one-stage combined surgery was superior to two-stage surgery.