Department of Spine Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Orthop Surg. 2021 Apr;13(2):537-545. doi: 10.1111/os.12889. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
The aim of the present paper was to reveal the clinical differences between selective and nonselective decompression for symptomatic tandem stenosis of the cervical and thoracic spine (TSCTS).
A total of 34 patients were eligible and included in the study. Among them, 8 patients underwent selective cervical decompression (CD), 15 patients underwent selective thoracic decompression (TD), and 11 patients underwent combined CD and TD (CTD) surgery. Age, sex, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, inpatient expenditure, preoperative upper Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) rate, canal occupation rate, high-intensity T2-weighted image (T2WI) of the spinal cord, and preoperative and postoperative JOA scores were compared among the three groups.
The CD group had shorter operative time (138.8 ± 36.1 vs 229.7 ± 95.8 vs 328.6 ± 94.8, min, P < 0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (141.3 ± 116.7 vs 496.7 ± 361.8 vs 654.6 ± 320.5, mL, P = 0.004), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (4.6 ± 1.6 vs 9.0 ± 3.5 vs 10.3 ± 6.6, days, P = 0.008), as well as lower preoperative upper JOA rate (34.1 ± 5.6 vs 53.9 ± 8.4 vs 48.2 ± 15.2, %, P = 0.001) than the TD and CTD groups. The CTD group had higher inpatient expenditure than the CD and TD groups (87,850 ± 18,379 vs 55,100 ± 12,890 vs 55,772 ± 15,715, CNY, P < 0.001). The cervical canal occupation rates were similar among different groups (P > 0.05); however, the TD group showed a higher thoracic canal occupation rate than the CD group (58.3 ± 14.7 vs 43.3 ± 12.3, %, P = 0.035). All positive levels in high-intensity T2WI of the spinal cord were decompressed. The preoperative JOA scores as well as the postoperative JOA scores at 6 months and at last follow-up were comparable among the three groups (P > 0.05). Similarly, the JOA recovery rate showed no significant difference among the groups (P > 0.05).
Selective CD or TD alone demonstrated similar clinical effectiveness to nonselective and combined CTD for TSCTS. Individualized surgical decision should be made after meticulous assessments of clinical and radiological manifestations, general patient condition, and socioeconomic factors.
本研究旨在揭示症状性颈胸段脊柱串联狭窄症(TSCTS)选择性减压与非选择性减压的临床差异。
共纳入 34 例符合条件的患者,其中 8 例行选择性颈椎减压术(CD),15 例行选择性胸椎减压术(TD),11 例行 CD 和 TD 联合手术(CTD)。比较三组患者的年龄、性别、手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、住院费用、术前上日本骨科协会(JOA)评分、椎管占位率、脊髓高信号 T2 加权像(T2WI)、术前和术后 JOA 评分。
CD 组手术时间更短(138.8 ± 36.1 比 229.7 ± 95.8 比 328.6 ± 94.8,min,P<0.001),术中出血量更少(141.3 ± 116.7 比 496.7 ± 361.8 比 654.6 ± 320.5,mL,P=0.004),术后住院时间更短(4.6 ± 1.6 比 9.0 ± 3.5 比 10.3 ± 6.6,d,P=0.008),术前上 JOA 评分更低(34.1 ± 5.6 比 53.9 ± 8.4 比 48.2 ± 15.2,%,P=0.001),与 TD 和 CTD 组相比。CTD 组的住院费用高于 CD 和 TD 组(87850±18379 比 55100±12890 比 55772±15715,CNY,P<0.001)。各组颈椎管占位率无明显差异(P>0.05);然而,TD 组的胸椎管占位率高于 CD 组(58.3±14.7 比 43.3±12.3,%,P=0.035)。脊髓高信号 T2WI 上所有阳性水平均得到减压。三组患者术前 JOA 评分及术后 6 个月、末次随访时的 JOA 评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。同样,三组间 JOA 恢复率无显著差异(P>0.05)。
对于 TSCTS,选择性 CD 或 TD 单独治疗与非选择性和联合 CTD 治疗具有相似的临床效果。应根据患者的临床和影像学表现、一般状况和社会经济因素进行仔细评估,然后做出个体化的手术决策。