Suppr超能文献

释放,还是不释放:大鼠社会释放范式中的社会强化效应。

To free, or not to free: Social reinforcement effects in the social release paradigm with rats.

作者信息

Hiura Lisa C, Tan Lavinia, Hackenberg Timothy D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, United States.

Department of Psychology, Reed College, Portland, OR 97202, United States.

出版信息

Behav Processes. 2018 Jul;152:37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Mar 10.

Abstract

The present research measured social reinforcement in rats, using a social-release procedure in which lever presses permitted 10-s access to a familiar social partner. The work requirements for reinforcement increased systematically according to progressive-ratio (PR) schedules. Social and food reinforcement value were compared across blocks of sessions (Experiment 1) and concurrently within the same sessions (Experiment 2). To assess motivational effects, response and reinforcer rates for both reinforcer types were studied under food restriction, social restriction, and combined food and social restriction. Responding was maintained by both reinforcers, albeit at substantially higher levels for food than for social access. Responding for social access decreased to low levels under extinction conditions, demonstrating functional control by the social-reinforcement contingency. Sensitivity to social restriction was seen in some conditions in Experiment 2, in which social reinforcers were earned earlier in the session (at lower food prices) under social restriction than under the other deprivation conditions. Altogether, results are consistent with a social reinforcement conceptualization, and demonstrate an important role for social contact in social release behavior. The study demonstrates a promising set of methods for analyzing and quantifying social reinforcement.

摘要

本研究通过一种社交释放程序来测量大鼠的社会强化,在该程序中,按压杠杆可让大鼠有10秒时间接触熟悉的社交伙伴。强化的工作要求根据累进比率(PR)时间表系统地增加。在不同的实验阶段(实验1)以及在同一实验阶段内同时(实验2)比较了社会强化和食物强化的价值。为了评估动机效应,研究了在食物限制、社会限制以及食物和社会联合限制条件下两种强化物类型的反应率和强化物率。两种强化物都能维持反应,尽管食物强化维持的反应水平比社交接触强化的反应水平要高得多。在消退条件下,对社交接触的反应降至低水平,这表明社会强化应急机制具有功能控制作用。在实验2的某些条件下观察到了对社会限制的敏感性,即在社会限制条件下,与其他剥夺条件相比,社交强化物在实验阶段更早获得(以更低的食物代价)。总体而言,结果与社会强化概念一致,并证明了社会接触在社交释放行为中的重要作用。该研究展示了一套用于分析和量化社会强化的有前景的方法。

相似文献

2
A progressive-duration schedule of reinforcement.一种渐进时长强化程序。
Behav Processes. 2015 Dec;121:93-7. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.10.022. Epub 2015 Nov 1.
10
Sexual reinforcement in the female rat.雌性大鼠的性强化作用。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Nov;68(3):399-410. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.68-399.

引用本文的文献

5
Assessment of help value affects reciprocation in Norway rats.对帮助价值的评估会影响挪威大鼠的互惠行为。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Oct 25;10(10):231253. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231253. eCollection 2023 Oct.
9
Dynamic influences on the neural encoding of social valence.社会效价的神经编码的动态影响。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2022 Sep;23(9):535-550. doi: 10.1038/s41583-022-00609-1. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
10
An opinion on the interpretation of social release in rats.对大鼠社会释放的解读的看法。
Biol Lett. 2021 Nov;17(11):20210355. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2021.0355. Epub 2021 Nov 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Does a rat release a soaked conspecific due to empathy?大鼠会出于同理心放走一只被浸湿的同类吗?
Anim Cogn. 2017 Mar;20(2):299-308. doi: 10.1007/s10071-016-1052-8. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
3
Rats demonstrate helping behavior toward a soaked conspecific.大鼠对一只湿透的同种个体表现出帮助行为。
Anim Cogn. 2015 Sep;18(5):1039-47. doi: 10.1007/s10071-015-0872-2. Epub 2015 May 12.
9
Evaluating the rewarding nature of social interactions in laboratory animals.评估实验室动物社会互动的奖励性质。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Oct;1(4):444-58. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2011.05.007. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
10
Empathy and pro-social behavior in rats.大鼠的同理心和亲社会行为。
Science. 2011 Dec 9;334(6061):1427-30. doi: 10.1126/science.1210789.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验