Suppr超能文献

测试二维码作为一种创新手段,以改善地理上分散的临床实习点之间的反馈。

Testing Quick Response (QR) Codes as an Innovation to Improve Feedback Among Geographically-Separated Clerkship Sites.

作者信息

Snyder Matthew J, Nguyen Dana R, Womack Jasmyne J, Bunt Christopher W, Westerfield Katie L, Bell Adriane E, Ledford Christy J W

机构信息

Nellis Family Medicine Residency, Nellis AFB, Nevada.

Department of Family Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD.

出版信息

Fam Med. 2018 Mar;50(3):188-194. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2018.936023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Collection of feedback regarding medical student clinical experiences for formative or summative purposes remains a challenge across clinical settings. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the use of a quick response (QR) code-linked online feedback form improves the frequency and efficiency of rater feedback.

METHODS

In 2016, we compared paper-based feedback forms, an online feedback form, and a QR code-linked online feedback form at 15 family medicine clerkship sites across the United States. Outcome measures included usability, number of feedback submissions per student, number of unique raters providing feedback, and timeliness of feedback provided to the clerkship director.

RESULTS

The feedback method was significantly associated with usability, with QR code scoring the highest, and paper second. Accessing feedback via QR code was associated with the shortest time to prepare feedback. Across four rotations, separate repeated measures analyses of variance showed no effect of feedback system on the number of submissions per student or the number of unique raters.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrate that preceptors in the family medicine clerkship rate QR code-linked feedback as a high usability platform. Additionally, this platform resulted in faster form completion than paper or online forms. An overarching finding of this study is that feedback forms must be portable and easily accessible. Potential implementation barriers and the social norm for providing feedback in this manner need to be considered.

摘要

背景与目的

为了形成性或总结性目的而收集有关医学生临床经验的反馈,在各个临床环境中仍然是一项挑战。本研究的目的是确定使用二维码链接的在线反馈表是否能提高评分者反馈的频率和效率。

方法

2016年,我们在美国15个家庭医学实习点比较了纸质反馈表、在线反馈表和二维码链接的在线反馈表。结果指标包括可用性、每个学生的反馈提交数量、提供反馈的不同评分者数量以及向实习主任提供反馈的及时性。

结果

反馈方法与可用性显著相关,二维码的得分最高纸质反馈表次之。通过二维码获取反馈与准备反馈的时间最短相关。在四轮实习中,单独的重复测量方差分析表明,反馈系统对每个学生的提交数量或不同评分者的数量没有影响。

结论

本研究结果表明,家庭医学实习中的带教教师将二维码链接的反馈评为高可用性平台。此外,该平台比纸质或在线表格能更快地完成表格填写。本研究的一个总体发现是,反馈表必须便于携带且易于获取。需要考虑潜在的实施障碍以及以这种方式提供反馈的社会规范。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验