From the Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health (E.R.K., A.K.B., M.S.E.) and Department of Neurology, College of Physicians and Surgeons (E.R.K., A.K.B., M.S.E.), Columbia University, New York, NY; Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI (G.A.W.); and Departments of Neurology, Public Health Sciences, and Human Genetics, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, FL (R.L.S.).
Stroke. 2018 Apr;49(4):835-841. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019580. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
The evidence supporting the deleterious cardiovascular health effects of living near a major roadway is growing, although this association is not universal. In primary analyses, we hypothesized that residential proximity to a major roadway would be associated with incident ischemic stroke and that cardiovascular risk factors would modify that association.
NOMAS (The Northern Manhattan Study) is an ongoing, population-based cohort study designed to measure cardiovascular risk factors, stroke incidence, and other outcomes in a multiethnic urban population. Recruitment occurred from 1993 to 2001 and participants are followed-up annually by telephone. Residential addresses at baseline were geocoded and Euclidean distance to nearest major roadway was estimated and categorized as in prior studies. We used Cox proportional hazard models to calculate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the association of this distance to incidence of stroke and other outcomes, adjusting for sociodemographic and cardiovascular risk factors, year at baseline, and neighborhood socioeconomic status. We assessed whether these associations varied by age, sex, smoking status, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension.
During a median follow-up period of 15 years (n=3287), 11% of participants were diagnosed with ischemic stroke. Participants living <100 m from a roadway had a 42% (95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.02) higher rate of ischemic stroke versus those living >400 m away. This association was more pronounced among noncurrent smokers (hazard ratio, 1.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-2.26) and not evident among smokers (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-2.06). There was no clear pattern of association between proximity to major roadways and other cardiovascular events including myocardial infarction, all-cause death, or vascular death.
In this urban multiethnic cohort, we found evidence supporting that within-city variation in residential proximity to major roadway is associated with higher risk of ischemic stroke. An individual's smoking history modified this association, with the association remaining only among participants not currently smokers.
越来越多的证据表明,居住在主要道路附近对心血管健康有害,尽管这种关联并非普遍存在。在初步分析中,我们假设居住与主要道路的接近程度与缺血性中风的发生有关,并且心血管危险因素会改变这种关联。
NOMAS(北曼哈顿研究)是一项正在进行的、基于人群的队列研究,旨在测量多民族城市人群中的心血管危险因素、中风发生率和其他结果。招募工作于 1993 年至 2001 年进行,参与者每年通过电话进行随访。在基线时将居住地址进行地理编码,并估计到最近主要道路的欧几里得距离,并按照先前的研究进行分类。我们使用 Cox 比例风险模型来计算该距离与中风发生率和其他结果的关联的风险比和 95%置信区间,调整社会人口统计学和心血管危险因素、基线年份和邻里社会经济地位。我们评估了这些关联是否因年龄、性别、吸烟状况、糖尿病和高血压而有所不同。
在中位数为 15 年的随访期间(n=3287),11%的参与者被诊断为缺血性中风。与居住在距离道路>400 米的参与者相比,居住在距离道路<100 米的参与者中风发生率高 42%(95%置信区间,1.01-2.02)。这种关联在非当前吸烟者中更为明显(风险比,1.54;95%置信区间,1.05-2.26),而在吸烟者中则不明显(风险比,0.69;95%置信区间,0.23-2.06)。在主要道路附近与其他心血管事件(包括心肌梗死、全因死亡或血管死亡)之间没有明显的关联模式。
在这个城市多民族队列中,我们发现了证据支持城市内居住与主要道路接近程度的差异与缺血性中风风险增加有关。个体的吸烟史改变了这种关联,仅在当前不吸烟者中存在这种关联。