Bruening Dustin A, Takahashi Kota Z
Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.
University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE, USA.
Gait Posture. 2018 May;62:111-116. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
Kinematic multi-segment foot models have been increasingly used to study foot function. The addition of kinetics to these models may enhance their utility; however, this been hindered by limitations in measuring ground reaction forces (GRFs) under individual foot segments.
To determine the accuracy of partitioning segment GRFs from a single force platform on foot joint kinetics.
Two potential partitioning methods were applied to a previously published three-segment kinetic foot model. The first method calculated joint kinetics only when the center of pressure crossed anterior to a joint (CPcross). The second method utilized a virtual pressure mat and a proportionality assumption to partition GRFs from the force platform (PRESS). Accuracy was assessed by comparing joint moments and powers obtained from each partitioning method to those obtained from a dual force plate approach that isolated forces under two segments at a time (2Plate). Thirteen healthy pediatric subjects walked in a controlled manner so as to isolate the kinetics acting at the metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint and, subsequently, the midtarsal joint.
The PRESS method was generally more accurate than the CPcross method, and both methods were more accurate at the midtarsal joint than at the MTP joint. At the MTP joint, sagittal plane moment peaks, power peaks, and work done were slightly overestimated, more so by CPcross than PRESS. At the midtarsal joint, sagittal plane moments were captured well by PRESS, while CPcross missed the early portion of the moment, but both methods captured power profiles fairly accurately.
Analysis of kinetics in multi-segment foot models may provide insight into foot function, pathologies, and interventions. Partitioning accuracy and generalizability is promising for analysis of the midtarsal joints but has limitations at the MTP joint.
运动多节段足部模型越来越多地用于研究足部功能。在这些模型中加入动力学可能会增强其效用;然而,这受到在单个足部节段下测量地面反作用力(GRF)的限制。
确定从单个力平台划分节段GRF对足部关节动力学的准确性。
将两种潜在的划分方法应用于先前发表的三节段动力学足部模型。第一种方法仅在压力中心越过关节前方时计算关节动力学(CPcross)。第二种方法利用虚拟压力垫和比例假设从力平台划分GRF(PRESS)。通过将每种划分方法获得的关节力矩和功率与从一次隔离两个节段下力的双力板方法(2Plate)获得的结果进行比较来评估准确性。13名健康的儿科受试者以可控方式行走,以分离作用于跖趾(MTP)关节以及随后中跗关节的动力学。
PRESS方法通常比CPcross方法更准确,并且两种方法在中跗关节处比在MTP关节处更准确。在MTP关节处,矢状面力矩峰值、功率峰值和做功略有高估,CPcross比PRESS更明显。在中跗关节处,PRESS很好地捕捉到了矢状面力矩,而CPcross错过了力矩的早期部分,但两种方法都相当准确地捕捉到了功率曲线。
多节段足部模型中的动力学分析可能有助于深入了解足部功能、病理和干预措施。划分准确性和通用性对于中跗关节的分析很有前景,但在MTP关节处存在局限性。