Vătășescu Radu, Cojocaru Cosmin, Năstasă Alexandrina, Popescu Sorin, Iorgulescu Corneliu, Bogdan Ștefan, Gondoș Viviana, Berruezo Antonio
Cardiology Department, Emergency Clinical Hospital of Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania.
Faculty of Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 4;11(13):3887. doi: 10.3390/jcm11133887.
Background: Electrical storm (ES) is defined by clustering episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and is associated with severe long-term outcomes. We sought to evaluate the prognostic impact of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in ES as assessed by aggressive programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS). Methods: Single-center retrospective longitudinal study with 82 consecutive ES patients referred for RFCA with a median follow-up (IQR 25−75%) of 45.43 months (15−69.86). All-cause mortality and VT recurrences were assessed in relation to RFCA outcomes defined by 4-extrastimuli PVS: Class 1—no ventricular arrhythmia; Class 2—no sustained monomorphic VTs (mVT) inducible, but non-sustained mVTs, polymorphic VTs, or VF inducible; Class 3—clinical VT non-inducible, other sustained mVTs inducible; and Class 4—clinical VT inducible. Results: Class 1, Class 2, Class 3, and Class 4 were achieved in 56.1%, 13.4%, 23.2%, and 7.4% of cases, respectively. The combined outcome of Class 1 + Class 2 (no sustained monomorphic VT inducible) led to improved survival (log-rank p < 0.001) and reduced VT recurrence (log-rank p < 0.001). Residual monomorphic VT inducibility (HR 6.262 (95% CI: 2.165−18.108, p = 0.001), NYHA IV heart failure symptoms (HR 20.519 (95% CI: 1.623−259.345), p = 0.02)), and age (HR 1.009 (95% CI: 1.041−1.160), p = 0.001)) independently predicted death during follow-up. LVEF was not predictive of death (HR 1.003 (95% CI: 0.946−1.063) or recurrences (HR 0.988 (95% CI: 0.955−1.021)). Conclusions: Non-inducibility for sustained mVTs after aggressive PVS post-RFCA leads to improved survival in ES, independently of LVEF.
电风暴(ES)定义为室性心动过速(VT)成簇发作,与严重的长期预后相关。我们试图评估通过积极的程控心室刺激(PVS)评估的射频导管消融(RFCA)对ES的预后影响。方法:对82例连续接受RFCA的ES患者进行单中心回顾性纵向研究,中位随访时间(四分位间距25%-75%)为45.43个月(15-69.86个月)。根据4次额外刺激PVS定义的RFCA结果评估全因死亡率和VT复发情况:1类——无室性心律失常;2类——不能诱发持续性单形性VT(mVT),但能诱发非持续性mVT、多形性VT或VF;3类——临床VT不能诱发,但能诱发其他持续性mVT;4类——能诱发临床VT。结果:1类、2类、3类和4类分别在56.1%、13.4%、23.2%和7.4%的病例中实现。1类+2类(不能诱发持续性单形性VT)的联合结果导致生存率提高(对数秩检验p<0.001)和VT复发减少(对数秩检验p<0.001)。残余单形性VT可诱发性(HR 6.262(95%CI:2.165-18.108,p=0.001))、纽约心脏协会IV级心力衰竭症状(HR 20.519(95%CI:1.623-259.345),p=0.02))和年龄(HR 1.009(95%CI:1.041-1.160),p=0.001))独立预测随访期间的死亡。左心室射血分数(LVEF)不能预测死亡(HR 1.003(95%CI:0.946-1.063))或复发(HR 0.988(95%CI:0.955-1.021))。结论:RFCA后积极PVS后不能诱发持续性mVT可改善ES患者的生存率,与LVEF无关。