• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

每日镇静脱机应用对重症监护病房患者发病率和死亡率的影响。

The Effect of Daily Sedation-Weaning Application on Morbidity and Mortality in Intensive Care Unit Patients.

作者信息

Kayir Selcuk, Ulusoy Hulya, Dogan Guvenc

机构信息

Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Hitit University Erol Olcok Training and Research Hospital.

Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Karadeniz Technical University.

出版信息

Cureus. 2018 Jan 13;10(1):e2062. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2062.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.2062
PMID:29545985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5849345/
Abstract

Background/aims Sedation is one of the most important components of intensive care unit (ICU) in patients who are mechanically ventilated at intensive care conditions. As a result of sedation and analgesia in the intensive care unit, the patient is to be awakened a comfortable and easy process. The aim of the study is to demonstrate the effects of day-time sedation interruptions in intensive care patients. Material and methods We made a retrospective review of 100 patients who were monitored, mechanically ventilated and treated at our intensive care unit between January 2008 and January 2013. Patients were divided into two groups, including Group P (continuous infusion of sedative agent) and Group D (daily sedation interruptions - daily recovery). Demographics, mechanical ventilation time, stay at intensive care unit, hospitalization period, time of first weaning, success of weaning, ventilator-related pneumonia (VRP), total doses of drugs, re-intubation frequency, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores and mortality rates of patients were compared. Ramsay Sedation Score (RSS) was used to evaluate the level of sedation. Considering that ideal sedation level is "3" with RSS, RSS < 3 is considered as mild sedation, while RSS > 3 is considered as deep sedation. Results There was no difference between demographics of patients. Mechanical ventilation period was significantly longer in Group P than Group D (p < 0.001). When stay at ICU unit was considered, ICU stay was significantly longer in Group P than Group D (p < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was found between two groups with respect to hospitalization period. In inter-group comparison, time to start first weaning was significantly late in Group P than Group D (p < 0.05). There was no difference between groups in terms of frequency of success of weaning and mortality rate (p > 0.05). In inter-group comparison the frequency of reintubation viewed in Group D was significantly less than in Group P (p < 0.05). Considering development of VRP, it was significantly more common in Group P in comparison with Group D (p < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was found between groups in terms of doses of sedative agents (p > 0.05). Considering doses of opioid analgesics, the total dose of fentanyl was significantly higher in Group P than Group D (p = 0.04), while no difference was found for doses of morphine (p > 0.05). Again, no statistical difference was found in doses of muscle relaxant agents (p > 0.05). Conclusion It was observed that the sedation technique with daily interruption is superior to continuous infusion of sedatives. Accordingly, we believe that daily weaning will make positive contributions to patients who are mechanically ventilated at intensive care unit.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e96/5849345/bc2c36b704f8/cureus-0010-00000002062-i08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e96/5849345/89b0557dcd79/cureus-0010-00000002062-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e96/5849345/cb599b2d280b/cureus-0010-00000002062-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e96/5849345/3b2a4ab0876b/cureus-0010-00000002062-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e96/5849345/1e871515c539/cureus-0010-00000002062-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e96/5849345/10543f38e11c/cureus-0010-00000002062-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e96/5849345/fe059f0c7663/cureus-0010-00000002062-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e96/5849345/9087b32e09f7/cureus-0010-00000002062-i07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e96/5849345/bc2c36b704f8/cureus-0010-00000002062-i08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e96/5849345/89b0557dcd79/cureus-0010-00000002062-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e96/5849345/cb599b2d280b/cureus-0010-00000002062-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e96/5849345/3b2a4ab0876b/cureus-0010-00000002062-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e96/5849345/1e871515c539/cureus-0010-00000002062-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e96/5849345/10543f38e11c/cureus-0010-00000002062-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e96/5849345/fe059f0c7663/cureus-0010-00000002062-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e96/5849345/9087b32e09f7/cureus-0010-00000002062-i07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e96/5849345/bc2c36b704f8/cureus-0010-00000002062-i08.jpg
摘要

背景/目的 在重症监护条件下接受机械通气的患者中,镇静是重症监护病房(ICU)最重要的组成部分之一。由于在重症监护病房进行镇静和镇痛,患者苏醒应是一个舒适且轻松的过程。本研究的目的是证明日间镇静中断对重症监护患者的影响。

材料与方法 我们对2008年1月至2013年1月在我们重症监护病房接受监测、机械通气和治疗的100例患者进行了回顾性研究。患者分为两组,包括P组(持续输注镇静剂)和D组(每日镇静中断 - 每日恢复)。比较了患者的人口统计学数据、机械通气时间、在重症监护病房的停留时间、住院时间、首次脱机时间、脱机成功率、呼吸机相关性肺炎(VRP)、药物总剂量、重新插管频率、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分以及患者的死亡率。采用Ramsay镇静评分(RSS)评估镇静水平。考虑到理想的镇静水平在RSS中为“3”,RSS < 3被视为轻度镇静,而RSS > 3被视为深度镇静。

结果 患者的人口统计学数据之间无差异。P组的机械通气时间明显长于D组(p < 0.001)。考虑在ICU的停留时间时,P组在ICU的停留时间明显长于D组(p < 0.001)。两组在住院时间方面未发现统计学上的显著差异。在组间比较中,P组开始首次脱机的时间明显晚于D组(p < 0.05)。两组在脱机成功率和死亡率方面无差异(p > 0.05)。在组间比较中,D组的重新插管频率明显低于P组(p < 0.05)。考虑VRP的发生情况,与D组相比,P组中VRP明显更常见(p < 0.05)。两组在镇静剂剂量方面未发现统计学上的显著差异(p > 0.05)。考虑阿片类镇痛药的剂量,P组中芬太尼的总剂量明显高于D组(p = 0.04),而吗啡剂量方面未发现差异(p > 0.05)。同样,在肌肉松弛剂剂量方面未发现统计学差异(p > 0.05)。

结论 观察到每日中断的镇静技术优于持续输注镇静剂。因此,我们认为每日脱机将对在重症监护病房接受机械通气的患者产生积极影响。

相似文献

1
The Effect of Daily Sedation-Weaning Application on Morbidity and Mortality in Intensive Care Unit Patients.每日镇静脱机应用对重症监护病房患者发病率和死亡率的影响。
Cureus. 2018 Jan 13;10(1):e2062. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2062.
2
[Sedation with stimulative circadian rhythm in mechanically ventilation patients in intensive care unit].[重症监护病房机械通气患者中具有刺激昼夜节律的镇静]
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2012 Jul;24(7):402-6.
3
[Remifentanil for analgesia and sedation in mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care unit].[瑞芬太尼用于重症监护病房机械通气患者的镇痛和镇静]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2013 Mar;25(3):167-70.
4
Randomized controlled trial of interrupted versus continuous sedative infusions in ventilated children.随机对照试验中断与连续镇静输注在通气儿童。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012 Mar;13(2):131-5. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31820aba48.
5
Daily interruption of sedative infusions in an adult medical-surgical intensive care unit: randomized controlled trial.成人内科-外科重症监护病房中每日中断镇静剂输注:随机对照试验。
J Adv Nurs. 2009 May;65(5):1054-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.04967.x.
6
Sedation Vacation in the ICU重症监护病房的镇静假期
7
An analgesia-delirium-sedation protocol for critically ill trauma patients reduces ventilator days and hospital length of stay.一种针对重症创伤患者的镇痛 - 谵妄 - 镇静方案可减少呼吸机使用天数和住院时间。
J Trauma. 2008 Sep;65(3):517-26. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318181b8f6.
8
[A study of using dexmedetomidine in ventilator bundle treatment in an ICU].[右美托咪定在重症监护病房呼吸机集束治疗中的应用研究]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2015 Oct;27(10):836-40.
9
Analgosedation: a paradigm shift in intensive care unit sedation practice.镇痛镇静:重症加强治疗病房镇静实践的范式转变。
Ann Pharmacother. 2012 Apr;46(4):530-40. doi: 10.1345/aph.1Q525. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
10
Prolonged sedation of critically ill patients with midazolam or propofol: impact on weaning and costs.使用咪达唑仑或丙泊酚对重症患者进行长时间镇静:对脱机及成本的影响。
Crit Care Med. 1997 Jan;25(1):33-40. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199701000-00009.

引用本文的文献

1
Specialized nursing intervention on critically ill patient in the prevention of intubation-associated pneumonia: an integrative literature review.危重症患者预防气管插管相关肺炎的专科护理干预:一项整合文献综述
Acute Crit Care. 2024 Aug;39(3):341-349. doi: 10.4266/acc.2024.00528. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
2
Daily Sedation Interruption vs Continuous Sedation in Pediatric Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.每日镇静中断与机械通气的儿科患者连续镇静的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2426225. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.26225.
3
Pediatric Ventilation Liberation: Bundled Extubation Readiness and Analgosedation Pathways Decrease Mechanical Ventilation Duration and Benzodiazepine Exposure.

本文引用的文献

1
Daily interruption of sedation in patients receiving mechanical ventilation.每日中断机械通气患者镇静。
Am J Crit Care. 2011 Jul;20(4):e90-8. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2011415.
2
The effect of nursing-implemented sedation on the duration of mechanical ventilation in the ICU.护理实施的镇静对重症监护病房机械通气持续时间的影响。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2010 Nov;16(6):521-6.
3
A protocol of no sedation for critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a randomised trial.无镇静方案用于接受机械通气的危重症患者的研究方案:一项随机试验。
儿科通气撤离:集束化拔管准备和镇痛镇静路径可缩短机械通气时间和减少苯二氮䓬类药物暴露。
Respir Care. 2022 Nov;67(11):1385-1395. doi: 10.4187/respcare.09942. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
Lancet. 2010 Feb 6;375(9713):475-80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62072-9. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
4
Use of intravenous infusion sedation among mechanically ventilated patients in the United States.美国机械通气患者静脉输注镇静的使用情况。
Crit Care Med. 2009 Dec;37(12):3031-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b02eff.
5
Delirium recognition and sedation practices in critically ill patients: a survey on the attitudes of 1015 Brazilian critical care physicians.谵妄识别与危重症患者镇静治疗:1015 名巴西重症监护医师态度调查
J Crit Care. 2009 Dec;24(4):556-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.04.004. Epub 2009 Jul 3.
6
Daily interruption of sedative infusions in an adult medical-surgical intensive care unit: randomized controlled trial.成人内科-外科重症监护病房中每日中断镇静剂输注:随机对照试验。
J Adv Nurs. 2009 May;65(5):1054-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.04967.x.
7
Sedation and analgesia for the mechanically ventilated patient.机械通气患者的镇静与镇痛
Clin Chest Med. 2009 Mar;30(1):131-41, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2008.09.001.
8
A critical review of daily sedation interruption in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房每日镇静中断的批判性综述。
J Clin Nurs. 2009 May;18(9):1239-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02513.x. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
9
Sedation practice in the intensive care unit: a UK national survey.重症监护病房的镇静实践:一项英国全国性调查。
Crit Care. 2008;12(6):R152. doi: 10.1186/cc7141. Epub 2008 Dec 1.
10
A randomized trial of daily awakening in critically ill patients managed with a sedation protocol: a pilot trial.一项使用镇静方案管理的重症患者每日唤醒随机试验:一项试点试验。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jul;36(7):2092-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31817bff85.