Department of Genomics and Genome Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Department of Dermatology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Invest Dermatol. 2018 Sep;138(9):2033-2040. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.02.038. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
Our understanding of the microbiome and the role of Propionibacterium acnes in skin homeostasis and acne pathogenesis is evolving. Multiple methods for sampling and identifying the skin's microbiome exist, and understanding the differences between the abilities of various methods to characterize the microbial landscape is warranted. This study compared the microbial diversity of samples obtained from the cheeks of 20 volunteers, collected by surface swab, pore strips, and cyanoacrylate glue follicular biopsy, all sequenced with 16S rRNA sequencing (V1-V3) and whole-genome metagenomic sequencing. The sequencing method of choice influenced the detection of microbial profiles as whole-genome sequencing captured more species diversity, including viruses, compared with 16S sequencing. The relative abundance of bacterial or fungal species and overall diversity did not differ between sampling methods. However, the viral composition of the skin's surface is unique compared with the follicle, suggesting distinct viral niches within the skin. P. acnes bacteria, ribotypes, and bacteriophages were identified equally by all sampling methods indicating that the sampling method, whether for the skin's surface or follicle, does not impact P. acnes-related characterization and that all may be equally useful for acne-related research studies.
我们对微生物组以及痤疮丙酸杆菌在皮肤稳态和痤疮发病机制中的作用的理解正在不断发展。有多种方法可用于采样和鉴定皮肤微生物组,有必要了解各种方法在描述微生物景观方面的能力差异。本研究比较了 20 名志愿者脸颊样本的微生物多样性,这些样本通过表面拭子、毛孔条和氰基丙烯酸酯胶毛囊活检采集,均进行了 16S rRNA 测序(V1-V3)和全基因组宏基因组测序。选择的测序方法会影响微生物谱的检测,因为与 16S 测序相比,全基因组测序能捕获更多的物种多样性,包括病毒。细菌或真菌物种的相对丰度和整体多样性在采样方法之间没有差异。然而,与毛囊相比,皮肤表面的病毒组成是独特的,这表明皮肤内存在独特的病毒生态位。所有采样方法都能同等地鉴定痤疮丙酸杆菌细菌、核糖体型和噬菌体,表明无论采样方法是针对皮肤表面还是毛囊,都不会影响与痤疮相关的特征描述,并且所有方法都可能对痤疮相关的研究同样有用。