• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

台湾登革热疫情的开放数据挖掘

Open data mining for Taiwan's dengue epidemic.

作者信息

Wu ChienHsing, Kao Shu-Chen, Shih Chia-Hung, Kan Meng-Hsuan

机构信息

Department of Information Management, National University of Kaohsiung, 700, Kaohsiung University Rd., Nanzih District, Kaohsiung 81148, Taiwan, ROC.

Department of Information Management, Kun Shan University, 195, Kunda Rd., YongKang Dist., Tainan, Taiwan, ROC.

出版信息

Acta Trop. 2018 Jul;183:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2018.03.017. Epub 2018 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.actatropica.2018.03.017
PMID:29549012
Abstract

By using a quantitative approach, this study examines the applicability of data mining technique to discover knowledge from open data related to Taiwan's dengue epidemic. We compare results when Google trend data are included or excluded. Data sources are government open data, climate data, and Google trend data. Research findings from analysis of 70,914 cases are obtained. Location and time (month) in open data show the highest classification power followed by climate variables (temperature and humidity), whereas gender and age show the lowest values. Both prediction accuracy and simplicity decrease when Google trends are considered (respectively 0.94 and 0.37, compared to 0.96 and 0.46). The article demonstrates the value of open data mining in the context of public health care.

摘要

本研究采用定量方法,检验数据挖掘技术从与台湾登革热疫情相关的开放数据中发现知识的适用性。我们比较了纳入或排除谷歌趋势数据时的结果。数据来源包括政府开放数据、气候数据和谷歌趋势数据。通过对70914个病例的分析得出了研究结果。开放数据中的地点和时间(月份)显示出最高的分类能力,其次是气候变量(温度和湿度),而性别和年龄的分类能力最低。考虑谷歌趋势时,预测准确性和简易性均有所下降(分别为0.94和0.37,而不考虑谷歌趋势时为0.96和0.46)。本文展示了公共卫生保健背景下开放数据挖掘的价值。

相似文献

1
Open data mining for Taiwan's dengue epidemic.台湾登革热疫情的开放数据挖掘
Acta Trop. 2018 Jul;183:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2018.03.017. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
2
Mining local climate data to assess spatiotemporal dengue fever epidemic patterns in French Guiana.挖掘当地气候数据以评估法属圭亚那登革热时空流行模式。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Oct;21(e2):e232-40. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002348. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
3
Correlation between Google Trends on dengue fever and national surveillance report in Indonesia.印度尼西亚登革热谷歌趋势与国家监测报告之间的相关性。
Glob Health Action. 2019;12(1):1552652. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2018.1552652.
4
A study of the dengue epidemic and meteorological factors in Guangzhou, China, by using a zero-inflated Poisson regression model.采用零膨胀泊松回归模型研究中国广州登革热疫情与气象因素的关系。
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2014 Jan;26(1):48-57. doi: 10.1177/1010539513490195. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
5
The development of an early warning system for climate-sensitive disease risk with a focus on dengue epidemics in Southeast Brazil.建立一个针对气候敏感疾病风险的早期预警系统,重点关注巴西东南部的登革热疫情。
Stat Med. 2013 Feb 28;32(5):864-83. doi: 10.1002/sim.5549. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
6
Developing a dengue forecast model using machine learning: A case study in China.利用机器学习开发登革热预测模型:以中国为例的案例研究。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Oct 16;11(10):e0005973. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005973. eCollection 2017 Oct.
7
Evaluating neighborhood structures for modeling intercity diffusion of large-scale dengue epidemics.评估社区结构以模拟大规模登革热疫情的城市间扩散。
Int J Health Geogr. 2018 May 3;17(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12942-018-0131-2.
8
Using prediction markets of market scoring rule to forecast infectious diseases: a case study in Taiwan.利用市场评分规则的预测市场来预测传染病:以台湾为例的案例研究。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Aug 11;15:766. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2121-7.
9
[Relationship of dengue fever epidemic to aedes density changed by climate factors in Guangdong Province].[广东省登革热疫情与气候因素改变的伊蚊密度的关系]
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2003 Mar;32(2):152-4.
10
Google dengue trends: An indicator of epidemic behavior. The Venezuelan Case.谷歌登革热趋势:一种流行行为指标。委内瑞拉案例。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Aug;104:26-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 May 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Infodemiology of Influenza-like Illness: Utilizing Google Trends' Big Data for Epidemic Surveillance.流感样疾病的信息流行病学:利用谷歌趋势大数据进行疫情监测。
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 27;13(7):1946. doi: 10.3390/jcm13071946.
2
Meteorological factors cannot be ignored in machine learning-based methods for predicting dengue, a systematic review.基于机器学习的登革热预测方法中,气象因素不容忽视:一项系统评价。
Int J Biometeorol. 2024 Mar;68(3):401-410. doi: 10.1007/s00484-023-02605-1. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
3
A Systematic Review on Modeling Methods and Influential Factors for Mapping Dengue-Related Risk in Urban Settings.
基于城市环境的登革热相关风险制图模型方法及影响因素的系统评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 18;19(22):15265. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215265.
4
The sharing of research data facing the COVID-19 pandemic.面对新冠疫情的研究数据共享
Scientometrics. 2021;126(6):4975-4990. doi: 10.1007/s11192-021-03971-6. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
5
Software Defect Prediction for Healthcare Big Data: An Empirical Evaluation of Machine Learning Techniques.软件缺陷预测在医疗大数据中的应用:机器学习技术的实证评估。
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Mar 15;2021:8899263. doi: 10.1155/2021/8899263. eCollection 2021.
6
Performance Assessment of Classification Algorithms on Early Detection of Liver Syndrome.分类算法在肝综合征早期检测中的性能评估。
J Healthc Eng. 2020 Dec 12;2020:6680002. doi: 10.1155/2020/6680002. eCollection 2020.
7
Google Trends Predicts Present and Future Plague Cases During the Plague Outbreak in Madagascar: Infodemiological Study.谷歌趋势预测马达加斯加鼠疫疫情期间的当前和未来鼠疫病例:信息流行病学研究
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2019 Mar 8;5(1):e13142. doi: 10.2196/13142.