Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Dept of Medicine 2, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Sorbonne University, Department of Hematology, Saint Antoine Hospital, INSERM UMR 938, Paris, France.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024 Oct;59(10):1394-1401. doi: 10.1038/s41409-024-02331-1. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
Choice of calcineurin inhibitor may impact the outcome of patients undergoing T-cell replete hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We retrospectively analyzed 2427 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first remission transplanted from a haploidentical (n = 1844) or unrelated donor (UD, n = 583) using cyclosporine A (CSA, 63%) or tacrolimus (TAC, 37%) and PT-Cy/MMF. In univariate analysis, CSA and TAC groups did not differ in 2-year leukemia-free or overall survival, cumulative incidence (CI) of relapse or non-relapse mortality. CI of severe grade III-IV acute GVHD was lower with TAC (6.6% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.02), without difference in grade II-IV acute GVHD or grade III-IV acute GVHD/severe chronic GVHD, relapse-free survival (GRFS). In multivariate analysis, TAC was associated with a lower risk of severe grade III-IV acute GVHD solely with haploidentical donors (HR 0.64 [95% CI, 0.42-0.98], p = 0.04), but not UD (HR 0.49 [95% CI, 0.2-1.21], p = 0.12). There was no significant difference for chronic GVHD. In conclusion, PT-Cy/MMF-based GVHD prophylaxis resulted in favorable OS and GRFS, irrespective of the CNI added. In haploidentical HCT, TAC seemed to prevent severe acute GVHD more effectively than CSA without impact on other outcome parameters.
钙调磷酸酶抑制剂的选择可能会影响接受 T 细胞充足的造血细胞移植(HCT)并接受 post-transplant cyclophosphamide(PT-Cy)和 mycophenolate mofetil(MMF)预防移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)的患者的结局。我们回顾性分析了 2427 例接受haploidentical(n=1844)或无关供体(UD,n=583)来源的缓解期急性髓系白血病(AML)患者接受环孢素 A(CSA,63%)或他克莫司(TAC,37%)与 PT-Cy/MMF 联合治疗的情况。在单变量分析中,CSA 和 TAC 组在 2 年无白血病生存率或总生存率、复发或非复发死亡率的累积发生率(CI)、重度 3-4 级急性 GVHD 的 CI 方面无差异。TAC 组的 3-4 级急性 GVHD 的发生率较低(6.6%vs.9.1%,p=0.02),2-4 级急性 GVHD 或 3-4 级急性 GVHD/严重慢性 GVHD、无复发生存率(GRFS)无差异。多变量分析显示,TAC 与 haploidentical 供体来源的严重 3-4 级急性 GVHD 风险降低相关(HR 0.64[95%CI,0.42-0.98],p=0.04),但与 UD 无关(HR 0.49[95%CI,0.2-1.21],p=0.12)。慢性 GVHD 无显著差异。总之,基于 PT-Cy/MMF 的 GVHD 预防可带来良好的总生存率和 GRFS,而与添加的 CNI 无关。在 haploidentical HCT 中,与 CSA 相比,TAC 似乎能更有效地预防严重的急性 GVHD,而对其他结局参数无影响。