Fleury Eduardo F C, Gianini Ana Claudia, Marcomini Karem, Oliveira Vilmar
1 School of Medical Sciences of Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
2 Instituto Brasileiro de Controle do Câncer, São Paulo, Brazil.
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jan 1;17:1533033818763461. doi: 10.1177/1533033818763461.
To determine the applicability of a computer-aided diagnostic system strain elastography system for the classification of breast masses diagnosed by ultrasound and scored using the criteria proposed by the breast imaging and reporting data system ultrasound lexicon and to determine the diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability.
This prospective study was conducted between March 1, 2016, and May 30, 2016. A total of 83 breast masses subjected to percutaneous biopsy were included. Ultrasound elastography images before biopsy were interpreted by 3 radiologists with and without the aid of computer-aided diagnostic system for strain elastography. The parameters evaluated by each radiologist results were sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy, with and without computer-aided diagnostic system for strain elastography. Interobserver variability was assessed using a weighted κ test and an intraclass correlation coefficient. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were also calculated.
The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.835, 0.801, and 0.765 for readers 1, 2, and 3, respectively, without computer-aided diagnostic system for strain elastography, and 0.900, 0.926, and 0.868, respectively, with computer-aided diagnostic system for strain elastography. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the 3 readers was 0.6713 without computer-aided diagnostic system for strain elastography and 0.811 with computer-aided diagnostic system for strain elastography.
The proposed computer-aided diagnostic system for strain elastography system has the potential to improve the diagnostic performance of radiologists in breast examination using ultrasound associated with elastography.
确定计算机辅助诊断系统应变弹性成像系统在对超声诊断的乳腺肿块进行分类中的适用性,并根据乳腺影像报告和数据系统超声词典提出的标准进行评分,同时确定诊断准确性和观察者间的变异性。
本前瞻性研究于2016年3月1日至2016年5月30日进行。共纳入83个接受经皮活检的乳腺肿块。3名放射科医生在有和没有应变弹性成像计算机辅助诊断系统的情况下,对活检前的超声弹性成像图像进行解读。每位放射科医生评估的参数结果包括有和没有应变弹性成像计算机辅助诊断系统时的敏感性、特异性和诊断准确性。使用加权κ检验和组内相关系数评估观察者间的变异性。还计算了受试者操作特征曲线下的面积。
在没有应变弹性成像计算机辅助诊断系统时,读者1、2和3的受试者操作特征曲线下面积分别为0.835、0.801和0.765;在有应变弹性成像计算机辅助诊断系统时,分别为0.900、0.926和0.868。在没有应变弹性成像计算机辅助诊断系统时,3位读者之间的组内相关系数为0.6713,在有应变弹性成像计算机辅助诊断系统时为0.811。
所提出的应变弹性成像计算机辅助诊断系统有可能提高放射科医生在使用与弹性成像相关的超声进行乳腺检查时的诊断性能。