Suppr超能文献

心肌梗死后患者使用慢性病治疗依从性量表评估的治疗依从性。

Adherence to treatment assessed with the Adherence in Chronic Diseases Scale in patients after myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Kosobucka Agata, Michalski Piotr, Pietrzykowski Łukasz, Kasprzak Michał, Obońska Karolina, Fabiszak Tomasz, Felsmann Mirosława, Kubica Aldona

机构信息

Department of Health Promotion, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.

Department of Cardiology and Internal Diseases, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Mar 5;12:333-340. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S150435. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A substantial subset of patients after myocardial infarction (MI) discontinue pivotal medication early after discharge. In particular, cessation of antiplatelet treatment may lead to catastrophic ischemic events. Thus, adherence to prescribed medication in patients after MI is an issue of medical and social concern.

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the level of adherence to treatment using a newly developed scale in patients after MI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A single-center, prospective, observational cohort clinical study with a 6-month follow-up was performed. Patients with physical or cognitive impairment, prisoners, soldiers, and family members and coworkers of the researchers were excluded from the study. The impact of selected sociodemographic and clinical factors on adherence was evaluated in 221 patients (63 women and 158 men) aged 30 to 91 years.

RESULTS

The results obtained with the Adherence in Chronic Diseases Scale (ACDS) ranged from 7 to 28 points; with the average and median scored being 23.35 and 24, respectively. The ACDS score reflects the level of adherence to prescribed medication. The high ACDS scores (>26 points) were obtained in 59 (26.7%) patients, intermediate scores (21-26 points) in 110 (49.8%) and low scores (<21 points) in 52 subjects (23.5%). Acute coronary syndrome (re-ACS) occurred in 18 (8.1%) patients during the follow-up period. The high-level adherence (ACDS score >26 points) was found in 11.1% of patients with re-ACS vs 28.4% of the remaining ones (=0.1). Lower scores (mean ± standard deviation) in re-ACS patients were found for items 2 and 3 of the ACDS: 3.11±0.68 vs 3.45±0.73 (=0.02) and 3.28±0.89 vs 3.64±0.64 (=0.04), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Age and previous MI were found to be independent factors influencing adherence assessed with the ACDS.

摘要

引言

心肌梗死(MI)后相当一部分患者在出院后早期就停止服用关键药物。特别是,抗血小板治疗的中断可能导致灾难性的缺血事件。因此,心肌梗死后患者对规定药物的依从性是一个医学和社会关注的问题。

目的

本研究的目的是使用一种新开发的量表评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心肌梗死后患者的治疗依从性水平。

患者和方法

进行了一项单中心、前瞻性、观察性队列临床研究,随访6个月。研究排除了身体或认知障碍患者、囚犯、士兵以及研究人员的家庭成员和同事。在221名年龄在30至91岁之间的患者(63名女性和158名男性)中评估了选定的社会人口统计学和临床因素对依从性的影响。

结果

慢性病依从性量表(ACDS)获得的结果范围为7至28分;平均得分和中位数得分分别为23.35和24分。ACDS分数反映了对规定药物的依从性水平。59名(26.7%)患者获得了高ACDS分数(>26分),110名(49.8%)患者获得了中等分数(21 - 26分),52名受试者(23.5%)获得了低分数(<21分)。随访期间18名(8.1%)患者发生了急性冠状动脉综合征(再发急性冠状动脉综合征,re - ACS)。再发急性冠状动脉综合征患者中11.1%的患者具有高依从性水平(ACDS分数>26分),其余患者中这一比例为28.4%(P = 0.1)。再发急性冠状动脉综合征患者的ACDS第2项和第3项得分(均值±标准差)较低:分别为3.11±0.68 vs 3.45±0.73(P = 0.02)和3.28±0.89 vs 3.64±0.64(P = 0.04)。

结论

年龄和既往心肌梗死被发现是影响通过ACDS评估的依从性的独立因素。

相似文献

1
Adherence to treatment assessed with the Adherence in Chronic Diseases Scale in patients after myocardial infarction.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Mar 5;12:333-340. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S150435. eCollection 2018.
4
Medication adherence and its determinants in patients after myocardial infarction.
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 21;10(1):12028. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68915-1.
7
Use of secondary prevention drug therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome after hospital discharge.
J Manag Care Pharm. 2008 Apr;14(3):271-80. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2008.14.3.271.
8
Adverse Change in Employment Status After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Analysis From the TRANSLATE-ACS Study.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Jun;11(6):e004528. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004528.
9
[Predictive value of the GRACE discharge score on the long-term out-of-hospital coronary thrombotic events after implantation of drug-eluting stents].
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2018 Mar 24;46(3):187-191. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2018.03.004.

引用本文的文献

2
Medication non-adherence in acute coronary syndrome patients in Duhok, Iraqi Kurdistan.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Jan 30;87(2):471-476. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002790. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Substance Use Disorder Among Patients with Primary Mental Illnesses in Southwestern Uganda.
J Dual Diagn. 2025 Jan-Mar;21(1):13-23. doi: 10.1080/15504263.2024.2434740. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
6

本文引用的文献

1
Psychometric properties of the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) in a psychiatric outpatient setting.
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2015 May-Aug;15(2):121-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2014.11.003. Epub 2014 Dec 25.
3
Prediction of high risk of non-adherence to antiplatelet treatment.
Kardiol Pol. 2016;74(1):61-7. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2015.0117. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
4
Long-term use of ticagrelor in patients with prior myocardial infarction.
N Engl J Med. 2015 May 7;372(19):1791-800. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500857. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
5
Discrepancies in assessment of adherence to antiplatelet treatment after myocardial infarction.
Pharmacology. 2015;95(1-2):50-8. doi: 10.1159/000371392. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
6
Time-related changes in determinants of antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel in patients after myocardial infarction.
Eur J Pharmacol. 2014 Nov 5;742:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2014.08.009. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
7
Cardiovascular disease in Europe 2014: epidemiological update.
Eur Heart J. 2014 Nov 7;35(42):2950-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu299. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
8
Adherence measurement and patient recruitment methods are poor in intervention trials to improve patient adherence.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Oct;67(10):1076-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.06.008. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
9
Determinants of patient adherence: a review of systematic reviews.
Front Pharmacol. 2013 Jul 25;4:91. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2013.00091. eCollection 2013.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验