Safeguarding Health through Infection Prevention Research Group, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK.
School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, 40 George Street, Glasgow G1 1QE, UK.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Jun 1;73(6):1464-1478. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky076.
A global antimicrobial resistance (AMR) awareness intervention targeting the general public has been prioritized.
To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions that aim to change AMR awareness and subsequent stewardship behaviours amongst the public.
Five databases were searched between 2000 and 2016 for interventions to change the public's AMR awareness and/or antimicrobial stewardship behaviours. Study designs meeting the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) criteria, non-controlled before-and-after studies and prospective cohort studies were considered eligible. Participants recruited from healthcare settings and studies measuring stewardship behaviours of healthcare professionals were excluded. Quality of studies was assessed using EPOC risk of bias criteria. Data were extracted and synthesized narratively. Registration: PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO 2016: CRD42016050343).
Twenty studies were included in the review with nine meeting the EPOC criteria. The overall risk of bias was high. Nineteen studies were conducted in high-income countries. Mass media interventions were most common (n = 7), followed by school-based (n = 6) and printed material interventions (n = 6). Seventeen studies demonstrated a significant effect on changing knowledge, attitudes or the public's antimicrobial stewardship behaviours. Analysis showed that interventions targeting schoolchildren and parents have notable potential, but for the general public the picture is less clear.
Our work provides an in-depth examination of the effectiveness of AMR interventions for the public. However, the studies were heterogeneous and the quality of evidence was poor. Well-designed, experimental studies on behavioural outcomes of such interventions are required.
优先考虑针对普通公众的全球抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)意识干预措施。
评估旨在改变公众对抗菌药物耐药性意识和随后的管理行为的干预措施的有效性。
在 2000 年至 2016 年期间,对五个数据库进行了搜索,以寻找旨在改变公众对抗菌药物耐药性意识和/或抗菌药物管理行为的干预措施。符合 Cochrane 有效实践和组织护理(EPOC)标准的研究设计、非对照前后研究和前瞻性队列研究被认为是合格的。从医疗保健环境中招募的参与者和测量医疗保健专业人员管理行为的研究被排除在外。使用 EPOC 偏倚风险标准评估研究质量。提取和综合数据进行叙述性分析。注册:PROSPERO 国际系统评价前瞻性注册(PROSPERO 2016:CRD42016050343)。
共有 20 项研究纳入了本综述,其中 9 项符合 EPOC 标准。总体偏倚风险较高。19 项研究在高收入国家进行。大众媒体干预最为常见(n=7),其次是基于学校的干预(n=6)和印刷材料干预(n=6)。17 项研究表明,在改变知识、态度或公众的抗菌药物管理行为方面具有显著效果。分析表明,针对学童和家长的干预措施具有显著潜力,但对于普通公众来说,情况不太清楚。
我们的工作深入检查了针对公众的抗菌药物耐药性干预措施的有效性。然而,这些研究存在异质性,证据质量较差。需要进行设计良好的、针对此类干预措施的行为结果的实验研究。