Sports Surgery Clinic, Santry Demesne, Dublin, Ireland.
Department of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Apr;47(5):1248-1253. doi: 10.1177/0363546518759540. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
Anterior shoulder instability with significant glenoid bone loss is a challenging condition. The open Latarjet procedure is the established standard treatment method in this setting, but there is an increasing use of the arthroscopic technique.
To systematically review the current evidence in the literature to ascertain if the open or arthroscopic Latarjet procedure resulted in improved patient outcomes.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
A literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was performed based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Cohort studies comparing the open and arthroscopic Latarjet procedures for anterior shoulder instability were included. Clinical outcomes were compared, with all statistical analysis performed using Review Manager (version 5.3). A P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant.
Six clinical trials with 896 patients were included. The open and arthroscopic Latarjet procedures resulted in a similar number of total recurrent instability (2.0% vs 2.4%; P = .75), revision procedures (2.4% vs 5.4%; P = .06), and total complications (13.8% vs 11.9%; P = .50), but the open procedure had a lower rate of persistent apprehension (10.2% vs 35.7%; P < .05). In addition, after the learning curve, the operative time was similar between the 2 procedures.
Both the open and arthroscopic Latarjet procedures result in significant improvements in patient function and outcome scores, with low rates of recurrent instability and similar complication rates. While technically challenging, the arthroscopic procedure has been shown to be a safe and viable alternative. However, there is a significant learning curve associated with the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure. The significant learning curve associated with this procedure suggests the arthroscopic procedure may be advisable to perform only in high-volume centers with experienced arthroscopists.
伴发明显盂骨缺损的肩关节前向不稳定是一种具有挑战性的病症。在这种情况下,开放式 Latarjet 手术是既定的标准治疗方法,但关节镜技术的应用越来越多。
系统回顾文献中的现有证据,以确定开放式或关节镜下 Latarjet 手术是否能改善患者的预后。
系统评价和荟萃分析。
根据 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南,对 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行文献检索。纳入比较开放式和关节镜下 Latarjet 手术治疗肩关节前向不稳定的队列研究。使用 Review Manager(版本 5.3)比较临床结果,所有统计分析均采用 Review Manager(版本 5.3)进行。P 值<.05 被认为具有统计学意义。
纳入了 6 项临床试验,共 896 例患者。开放式和关节镜下 Latarjet 手术的总复发不稳定率(2.0% vs 2.4%;P =.75)、翻修手术率(2.4% vs 5.4%;P =.06)和总并发症率(13.8% vs 11.9%;P =.50)相似,但开放式手术的持续性警觉率较低(10.2% vs 35.7%;P<.05)。此外,在学习曲线之后,两种手术的手术时间相似。
开放式和关节镜下 Latarjet 手术均可显著改善患者的功能和结局评分,复发不稳定率低,并发症发生率相似。尽管技术上具有挑战性,但关节镜手术已被证明是一种安全可行的替代方法。然而,关节镜下 Latarjet 手术存在显著的学习曲线。该手术的显著学习曲线表明,关节镜下 Latarjet 手术仅在高容量中心且有经验的关节镜医生操作时才是明智的选择。