Suppr超能文献

肩痛患者中恐惧回避信念问卷与肩痛和功能障碍指数及数字疼痛评分量表的信效度及相关性

Reliability and relationship of the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire with the shoulder pain and disability index and numeric pain rating scale in patients with shoulder pain.

作者信息

Riley Sean P, Tafuto Vincent, Cote Mark, Brismée Jean-Michel, Wright Alexis, Cook Chad

机构信息

a Doctor of Physical Therapy Program , Sacred Heart University , Fairfield , CT , USA.

b Department of Rehabilitation , UConn Health , Farmington , CT , USA.

出版信息

Physiother Theory Pract. 2019 May;35(5):464-470. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2018.1453004. Epub 2018 Mar 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine: 1) the test-retest reliability of Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) Work (FABQW) subscale, FABQ Physical Activity (FABQPA) subscale, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) Pain subscale, SPADI Disability subscale, and Numeric Pain Rating scale (NPRS); and 2) the relationship between the FABQPA, FABQW, SPADI pain, SPADI disability, and NPRS after 4 weeks of pragmatically applied physical therapy (PT) in patients with shoulder pain.

DESIGN

Prospective, single-group observational design.

METHODS

Data were collected at initial evaluation, the first follow-up visit prior to the initiation of treatment, and after 4 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

Statistically significant Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) values were reported for the FABQPA, FABQW, SPADI Pain, SPADI Disability, and NPRS. A statistically significant moderate relationship between the FABQPA subscale, SPADI subscale, and NPRS could not be established prior to and after 4 weeks of pragmatically applied PT. Statistically significant differences were observed between the initial evaluation and four-week follow-up for the FABQPA, SPADI Pain, SPADI Disability, and NPRS (p < 0.01).

DISCUSSION

Since a meaningful relationship between the FABQ, SPADI, and NPRS did not exist, it suggests that the FABQPA may be measuring a metric other than pain.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the FABQW may not be sensitive to change over time.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定:1)恐惧-回避信念问卷(FABQ)工作(FABQW)分量表、FABQ身体活动(FABQPA)分量表、肩痛与功能障碍指数(SPADI)疼痛分量表、SPADI功能障碍分量表以及数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)的重测信度;2)肩痛患者在经过4周实用物理治疗(PT)后,FABQPA、FABQW、SPADI疼痛、SPADI功能障碍与NPRS之间的关系。

设计

前瞻性单组观察性设计。

方法

在初始评估、治疗开始前的首次随访以及治疗4周后收集数据。

结果

报告了FABQPA、FABQW、SPADI疼痛、SPADI功能障碍和NPRS具有统计学意义的组内相关系数(ICC)值。在实用物理治疗4周前后,FABQPA分量表、SPADI分量表和NPRS之间未建立具有统计学意义的中等关系。在初始评估与4周随访之间,观察到FABQPA、SPADI疼痛、SPADI功能障碍和NPRS存在统计学显著差异(p < 0.01)。

讨论

由于FABQ、SPADI和NPRS之间不存在有意义的关系,则表明FABQPA可能测量的是疼痛以外的指标。

结论

本研究表明,FABQW可能对随时间的变化不敏感。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验