• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于空间代理模型的健康风险智能判断。

Intelligent judgements over health risks in a spatial agent-based model.

机构信息

Department of Governance and Technology for Sustainability (CSTM), Faculty of Behavioral, Management, and Social Sciences (BMS), University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.

Department of Computer Science, College of Science, University of Duhok (UoD), Duhok, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.

出版信息

Int J Health Geogr. 2018 Mar 20;17(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12942-018-0128-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12942-018-0128-x
PMID:29558944
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5859507/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Millions of people worldwide are exposed to deadly infectious diseases on a regular basis. Breaking news of the Zika outbreak for instance, made it to the main media titles internationally. Perceiving disease risks motivate people to adapt their behavior toward a safer and more protective lifestyle. Computational science is instrumental in exploring patterns of disease spread emerging from many individual decisions and interactions among agents and their environment by means of agent-based models. Yet, current disease models rarely consider simulating dynamics in risk perception and its impact on the adaptive protective behavior. Social sciences offer insights into individual risk perception and corresponding protective actions, while machine learning provides algorithms and methods to capture these learning processes. This article presents an innovative approach to extend agent-based disease models by capturing behavioral aspects of decision-making in a risky context using machine learning techniques. We illustrate it with a case of cholera in Kumasi, Ghana, accounting for spatial and social risk factors that affect intelligent behavior and corresponding disease incidents. The results of computational experiments comparing intelligent with zero-intelligent representations of agents in a spatial disease agent-based model are discussed.

METHODS

We present a spatial disease agent-based model (ABM) with agents' behavior grounded in Protection Motivation Theory. Spatial and temporal patterns of disease diffusion among zero-intelligent agents are compared to those produced by a population of intelligent agents. Two Bayesian Networks (BNs) designed and coded using R and are further integrated with the NetLogo-based Cholera ABM. The first is a one-tier BN1 (only risk perception), the second is a two-tier BN2 (risk and coping behavior).

RESULTS

We run three experiments (zero-intelligent agents, BN1 intelligence and BN2 intelligence) and report the results per experiment in terms of several macro metrics of interest: an epidemic curve, a risk perception curve, and a distribution of different types of coping strategies over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results emphasize the importance of integrating behavioral aspects of decision making under risk into spatial disease ABMs using machine learning algorithms. This is especially relevant when studying cumulative impacts of behavioral changes and possible intervention strategies.

摘要

背景

全球数百万人经常接触致命的传染病。例如,寨卡病毒爆发的突发新闻登上了国际主流媒体的头条。对疾病风险的感知促使人们改变行为,以更安全、更具保护性的生活方式。通过基于主体的模型,计算科学在探索由许多个人决策以及主体与其环境之间的相互作用所产生的疾病传播模式方面发挥了重要作用。然而,当前的疾病模型很少考虑模拟风险感知及其对适应性保护行为的影响。社会科学提供了对个体风险感知及其相应保护行为的深入了解,而机器学习则提供了捕获这些学习过程的算法和方法。本文提出了一种创新方法,通过使用机器学习技术捕获风险决策中的行为方面,从而扩展基于主体的疾病模型。我们使用加纳库马西的霍乱案例来说明这一点,该案例考虑了影响智能行为和相应疾病事件的空间和社会风险因素。讨论了在空间疾病基于主体的模型中比较智能代理和零智能代理的计算实验结果。

方法

我们提出了一个基于主体的空间疾病模型(ABM),其中代理的行为基于保护动机理论。比较了零智能代理之间的疾病扩散的时空模式与智能代理产生的时空模式。使用 R 设计和编写了两个贝叶斯网络(BN),并进一步与基于 NetLogo 的霍乱 ABM 集成。第一个是单层 BN1(仅风险感知),第二个是双层 BN2(风险和应对行为)。

结果

我们运行了三个实验(零智能代理、BN1 智能代理和 BN2 智能代理),并根据几个感兴趣的宏观指标报告每个实验的结果:流行曲线、风险感知曲线以及不同类型的应对策略随时间的分布。

结论

我们的结果强调了使用机器学习算法将风险决策的行为方面纳入空间疾病 ABM 的重要性。当研究行为变化的累积影响和可能的干预策略时,这一点尤其重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/367c/5859507/fff50a8ffd65/12942_2018_128_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/367c/5859507/19d4d73abc13/12942_2018_128_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/367c/5859507/621bc28e110d/12942_2018_128_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/367c/5859507/c9029d1b4974/12942_2018_128_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/367c/5859507/05c6900220c6/12942_2018_128_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/367c/5859507/415e91f5a949/12942_2018_128_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/367c/5859507/27b8d576c950/12942_2018_128_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/367c/5859507/5fb020fe9802/12942_2018_128_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/367c/5859507/ef8740893805/12942_2018_128_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/367c/5859507/fff50a8ffd65/12942_2018_128_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/367c/5859507/19d4d73abc13/12942_2018_128_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/367c/5859507/621bc28e110d/12942_2018_128_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/367c/5859507/c9029d1b4974/12942_2018_128_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/367c/5859507/05c6900220c6/12942_2018_128_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/367c/5859507/415e91f5a949/12942_2018_128_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/367c/5859507/27b8d576c950/12942_2018_128_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/367c/5859507/5fb020fe9802/12942_2018_128_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/367c/5859507/ef8740893805/12942_2018_128_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/367c/5859507/fff50a8ffd65/12942_2018_128_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Intelligent judgements over health risks in a spatial agent-based model.基于空间代理模型的健康风险智能判断。
Int J Health Geogr. 2018 Mar 20;17(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12942-018-0128-x.
2
Risk perception and behavioral change during epidemics: Comparing models of individual and collective learning.传染病流行期间的风险感知和行为改变:个体和集体学习模型的比较。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 6;15(1):e0226483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226483. eCollection 2020.
3
Bayesian structured additive regression modeling of epidemic data: application to cholera.贝叶斯结构加法回归模型在传染病数据中的应用:以霍乱为例。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Aug 6;12:118. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-118.
4
ASAS-NANP symposium: mathematical modeling in animal nutrition: agent-based modeling for livestock systems: the mechanics of development and application.ASAS-NANP 研讨会:动物营养中的数学建模:基于代理的牲畜系统建模:开发和应用的力学。
J Anim Sci. 2023 Jan 3;101. doi: 10.1093/jas/skad321.
5
Bayesian Networks for Risk Prediction Using Real-World Data: A Tool for Precision Medicine.贝叶斯网络在真实世界数据中的风险预测中的应用:精准医学的工具。
Value Health. 2019 Apr;22(4):439-445. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
6
Synergistic Integration Between Machine Learning and Agent-Based Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Review.机器学习与基于智能体的建模之间的协同整合:多学科综述
IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2023 May;34(5):2170-2190. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3106777. Epub 2023 May 2.
7
Temporal trend and spatial clustering of cholera epidemic in Kumasi-Ghana.加纳库马西地区霍乱疫情的时间趋势和空间聚集性。
Sci Rep. 2018 Dec 14;8(1):17848. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36029-4.
8
Machine Learning and Intelligent Diagnostics in Dental and Orofacial Pain Management: A Systematic Review.机器学习和智能诊断在口腔颌面部疼痛管理中的应用:系统评价。
Pain Res Manag. 2021 Apr 24;2021:6659133. doi: 10.1155/2021/6659133. eCollection 2021.
9
The role of soft computing in intelligent machines.软计算在智能机器中的作用。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2003 Aug 15;361(1809):1749-80. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2003.1223.
10
Supervised learning and prediction of spatial epidemics.空间流行病的监督学习与预测
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2014 Oct;11:59-77. doi: 10.1016/j.sste.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
How do online users perceive health risks during public health emergencies? Empirical evidence from China.网络用户在突发公共卫生事件期间如何看待健康风险?来自中国的实证证据。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 27;14:1087229. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1087229. eCollection 2023.
2
Evaluating efficacy of indoor non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19 outbreaks with a coupled spatial-SIR agent-based simulation framework.使用基于空间-SIR 耦合智能体的模拟框架评估室内非药物干预措施对 COVID-19 疫情的效果。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 13;12(1):6202. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09942-y.
3
Risk perception and behavioral change during epidemics: Comparing models of individual and collective learning.

本文引用的文献

1
Social Contact Structures and Time Use Patterns in the Manicaland Province of Zimbabwe.津巴布韦马尼卡兰省的社会接触结构与时间利用模式
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 18;12(1):e0170459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170459. eCollection 2017.
2
Integrating Household Risk Mitigation Behavior in Flood Risk Analysis: An Agent-Based Model Approach.将家庭风险缓解行为纳入洪水风险分析:基于代理的模型方法。
Risk Anal. 2017 Oct;37(10):1977-1992. doi: 10.1111/risa.12740. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
3
Municipal solid waste characterization and quantification as a measure towards effective waste management in Ghana.
传染病流行期间的风险感知和行为改变:个体和集体学习模型的比较。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 6;15(1):e0226483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226483. eCollection 2020.
加纳城市固体废物的特征描述和量化,作为实现有效废物管理的措施。
Waste Manag. 2015 Dec;46:15-27. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.09.009. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
4
Agricultural landscape and spatial distribution of Toxoplasma gondii in rural environment: an agent-based model.农业景观与农村环境中弓形虫的空间分布:基于主体的模型
Int J Health Geogr. 2014 Oct 28;13:45. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-13-45.
5
Risky business: the effects of an individualized health information intervention on health risk perceptions and leisure time physical activity among people with spinal cord injury.冒险的生意:个体化健康信息干预对脊髓损伤患者健康风险感知和休闲时间体力活动的影响。
Disabil Health J. 2011 Jul;4(3):165-76. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2010.12.001. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
6
An agent-based approach for modeling dynamics of contagious disease spread.一种基于主体的传染病传播动态建模方法。
Int J Health Geogr. 2009 Aug 5;8:50. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-8-50.
7
Comparison of municipal solid waste management systems in Canada and Ghana: a case study of the cities of London, Ontario, and Kumasi, Ghana.加拿大和加纳城市固体废物管理系统比较:以安大略省伦敦市和加纳库马西市为例
Waste Manag. 2009 Oct;29(10):2779-86. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.06.019. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
8
The spread of awareness and its impact on epidemic outbreaks.意识的传播及其对疫情爆发的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Apr 21;106(16):6872-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810762106. Epub 2009 Mar 30.