Monaro Merylin, Gamberini Luciano, Zecchinato Francesca, Sartori Giuseppe
Human Inspired Technology Research Centre, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 6;9:283. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00283. eCollection 2018.
The use of faked identities is a current issue for both physical and online security. In this paper, we test the differences between subjects who report their true identity and the ones who give fake identity responding to control, simple, and complex questions. Asking complex questions is a new procedure for increasing liars' cognitive load, which is presented in this paper for the first time. The experiment consisted in an identity verification task, during which response time and errors were collected. Twenty participants were instructed to lie about their identity, whereas the other 20 were asked to respond truthfully. Different machine learning (ML) models were trained, reaching an accuracy level around 90-95% in distinguishing liars from truth tellers based on error rate and response time. Then, to evaluate the generalization and replicability of these models, a new sample of 10 participants were tested and classified, obtaining an accuracy between 80 and 90%. In short, results indicate that liars may be efficiently distinguished from truth tellers on the basis of their response times and errors to complex questions, with an adequate generalization accuracy of the classification models.
使用虚假身份对于实体安全和网络安全来说都是当前的一个问题。在本文中,我们测试了在回答控制问题、简单问题和复杂问题时,报告真实身份的受试者与提供虚假身份的受试者之间的差异。提出复杂问题是一种增加说谎者认知负荷的新方法,本文首次对此进行阐述。该实验包括一个身份验证任务,在此期间收集反应时间和错误情况。20名参与者被指示对自己的身份进行说谎,而另外20名参与者被要求如实回答。训练了不同的机器学习(ML)模型,基于错误率和反应时间,在区分说谎者和说实话者方面达到了约90 - 95%的准确率水平。然后,为了评估这些模型的泛化能力和可重复性,对10名参与者的新样本进行了测试和分类,准确率在80%到90%之间。简而言之,结果表明,根据说谎者对复杂问题的反应时间和错误情况,可以有效地将他们与说实话者区分开来,分类模型具有足够的泛化准确率。