Pace Giorgia, Orrù Graziella, Monaro Merylin, Gnoato Francesca, Vitaliani Roberta, Boone Kyle B, Gemignani Angelo, Sartori Giuseppe
Department of Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular and Critical Area Pathology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 23;10:1650. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01650. eCollection 2019.
Here we report an investigation on the accuracy of the b Test, a measure to identify malingering of cognitive symptoms, in detecting malingerers of mild cognitive impairment. Three groups of participants, patients with Mild Neurocognitive Disorder ( = 21), healthy elders (controls, = 21), and healthy elders instructed to simulate mild cognitive disorder (malingerers, = 21) were administered two background neuropsychological tests (MMSE, FAB) as well as the b Test. Malingerers performed significantly worse on all error scores as compared to patients and controls, and performed poorly than controls, but comparably to patients, on the time score. Patients performed significantly worse than controls on all scores, but both groups showed the same pattern of more omission than commission errors. By contrast, malingerers exhibited the opposite pattern with more commission errors than omission errors. Machine learning models achieve an overall accuracy higher than 90% in distinguishing patients from malingerers on the basis of b Test results alone. Our findings suggest that b Test error scores accurately distinguish patients with Mild Neurocognitive Disorder from malingerers and may complement other validated procedures such as the Medical Symptom Validity Test.
在此,我们报告一项关于b测试准确性的调查,b测试是一种识别认知症状伪装的测量方法,用于检测轻度认知障碍的伪装者。三组参与者,即轻度神经认知障碍患者(n = 21)、健康老年人(对照组,n = 21)以及被指示模拟轻度认知障碍的健康老年人(伪装者,n = 21),接受了两项背景神经心理学测试(MMSE、FAB)以及b测试。与患者和对照组相比,伪装者在所有错误分数上表现明显更差,在时间分数上比对照组表现差,但与患者相当。患者在所有分数上比对照组表现明显更差,但两组都表现出相同的模式,即遗漏错误多于执行错误。相比之下,伪装者表现出相反的模式,执行错误多于遗漏错误。机器学习模型仅基于b测试结果就能在区分患者和伪装者方面达到高于90%的总体准确率。我们的研究结果表明,b测试错误分数能准确区分轻度神经认知障碍患者和伪装者,并且可能补充其他经过验证的程序,如医学症状效度测试。