• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

说谎:无法抑制的真相?

Telling lies: the irrepressible truth?

机构信息

School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e60713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060713. Epub 2013 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0060713
PMID:23573277
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3616109/
Abstract

Telling a lie takes longer than telling the truth but precisely why remains uncertain. We investigated two processes suggested to increase response times, namely the decision to lie and the construction of a lie response. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants were directed or chose whether to lie or tell the truth. A colored square was presented and participants had to name either the true color of the square or lie about it by claiming it was a different color. In both experiments we found that there was a greater difference between lying and telling the truth when participants were directed to lie compared to when they chose to lie. In Experiments 3 and 4, we compared response times when participants had only one possible lie option to a choice of two or three possible options. There was a greater lying latency effect when questions involved more than one possible lie response. Experiment 5 examined response choice mechanisms through the manipulation of lie plausibility. Overall, results demonstrate several distinct mechanisms that contribute to additional processing requirements when individuals tell a lie.

摘要

撒谎比说实话需要更长的时间,但具体原因尚不确定。我们研究了两种被认为会增加反应时间的过程,即撒谎的决定和撒谎的构建。在实验 1 和 2 中,参与者被指示或选择撒谎或说实话。呈现一个彩色方块,参与者必须说出方块的真实颜色,或者通过声称它是另一种颜色来撒谎。在这两个实验中,我们发现当参与者被指示撒谎时,撒谎和说实话之间的差异比他们选择撒谎时更大。在实验 3 和 4 中,我们比较了当参与者只有一个可能的撒谎选项和两个或三个可能选项可供选择时的反应时间。当问题涉及多个可能的撒谎反应时,撒谎潜伏期的影响更大。实验 5 通过操纵谎言的可能性来检验反应选择机制。总的来说,结果表明,当个人撒谎时,有几个不同的机制会导致额外的处理要求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af9/3616109/64901cbcc5ad/pone.0060713.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af9/3616109/b913e5541bfb/pone.0060713.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af9/3616109/977480395cb5/pone.0060713.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af9/3616109/ebf68309ab56/pone.0060713.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af9/3616109/a71d272b77a9/pone.0060713.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af9/3616109/6ad06dfcc324/pone.0060713.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af9/3616109/1ec20bd3893a/pone.0060713.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af9/3616109/48e40e7d89c2/pone.0060713.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af9/3616109/64901cbcc5ad/pone.0060713.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af9/3616109/b913e5541bfb/pone.0060713.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af9/3616109/977480395cb5/pone.0060713.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af9/3616109/ebf68309ab56/pone.0060713.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af9/3616109/a71d272b77a9/pone.0060713.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af9/3616109/6ad06dfcc324/pone.0060713.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af9/3616109/1ec20bd3893a/pone.0060713.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af9/3616109/48e40e7d89c2/pone.0060713.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af9/3616109/64901cbcc5ad/pone.0060713.g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Telling lies: the irrepressible truth?说谎:无法抑制的真相?
PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e60713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060713. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
2
Sex and personality traits influence the difference between time taken to tell the truth or lie.性别和个性特征会影响说实话或说谎所需时间的差异。
Percept Mot Skills. 2003 Oct;97(2):451-60. doi: 10.2466/pms.2003.97.2.451.
3
An empirical test of the decision to lie component of the Activation-Decision-Construction-Action Theory (ADCAT).对激活-决策-构建-行动理论(ADCAT)中说谎决策部分的实证检验。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Sep;169:45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.05.004. Epub 2016 May 22.
4
Lie, truth, lie: the role of task switching in a deception context.谎言、真相、谎言:任务切换在欺骗情境中的作用。
Psychol Res. 2015 May;79(3):478-88. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0582-4. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
5
Suppressing the truth as a mechanism of deception: Delta plots reveal the role of response inhibition in lying.将隐瞒真相作为一种欺骗手段:德尔塔图揭示了反应抑制在说谎中的作用。
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Dec;37:148-59. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.09.005. Epub 2015 Sep 19.
6
Generating lies produces lower memory predictions and higher memory performance than telling the truth: Evidence for a metacognitive illusion.编造谎言比说实话产生更低的记忆预测和更高的记忆表现:元认知错觉的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Mar;44(3):465-484. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000459. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
7
Lying relies on the truth.谎言依赖于真相。
Cognition. 2014 Sep;132(3):324-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 May 22.
8
Children's lie-telling to conceal a parent's transgression: legal implications.儿童为隐瞒父母的违法行为而说谎:法律影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2004 Aug;28(4):411-35. doi: 10.1023/b:lahu.0000039333.51399.f6.
9
Learning through observing: Effects of modeling truth- and lie-telling on children's honesty.通过观察学习:榜样诚实和说谎对儿童诚实的影响。
Dev Sci. 2020 Jan;23(1):e12883. doi: 10.1111/desc.12883. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
10
Cross-cultural differences in children's choices, categorizations, and evaluations of truths and lies.儿童在对真话和谎言的选择、分类及评价方面的跨文化差异。
Dev Psychol. 2007 Mar;43(2):278-93. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.278.

引用本文的文献

1
Detecting faking-good response style in personality questionnaires with four choice alternatives.用四项选择的人格问卷检测虚假良好反应模式。
Psychol Res. 2021 Nov;85(8):3094-3107. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01473-3. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
2
The Detection of Malingering: A New Tool to Identify Made-Up Depression.诈病的检测:一种识别伪装抑郁症的新工具。
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 8;9:249. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00249. eCollection 2018.
3
False Identity Detection Using Complex Sentences.使用复合句进行虚假身份检测。

本文引用的文献

1
Inducing and assessing differentiated emotion-feeling states in the laboratory.在实验室中诱导和评估分化的情绪-感觉状态。
Cogn Emot. 1993 Mar;7(2):171-93. doi: 10.1080/02699939308409183.
2
Lying in the scanner: covert countermeasures disrupt deception detection by functional magnetic resonance imaging.躺在扫描仪中:功能性磁共振成像的秘密对策扰乱欺骗检测。
Neuroimage. 2011 Mar 1;55(1):312-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.025. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
3
The action dynamics of overcoming the truth.克服真相的行动动力学。
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 6;9:283. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00283. eCollection 2018.
4
A reverse order interview does not aid deception detection regarding intentions.反向顺序访谈无助于检测有关意图的欺骗行为。
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 31;6:1298. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01298. eCollection 2015.
5
Lie, truth, lie: the role of task switching in a deception context.谎言、真相、谎言:任务切换在欺骗情境中的作用。
Psychol Res. 2015 May;79(3):478-88. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0582-4. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Aug;17(4):486-91. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.4.486.
4
Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex specifically processes general - but not personal - knowledge deception: Multiple brain networks for lying.背外侧前额叶皮层专门处理一般的——而不是个人的——知识欺骗:说谎的多个大脑网络。
Behav Brain Res. 2010 Aug 25;211(2):164-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.03.024. Epub 2010 Mar 20.
5
A truth that's told with bad intent: an ERP study of deception.带着不良意图讲述的真相:一项关于欺骗的事件相关电位研究。
Cognition. 2010 Jan;114(1):105-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.014.
6
Time and encoding effects in the concealed knowledge test.内隐知识测试中的时间和编码效应。
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2009 Sep;34(3):177-87. doi: 10.1007/s10484-009-9092-3. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
7
Psychopathic traits and deception: functional magnetic resonance imaging study.精神病态特质与欺骗:功能磁共振成像研究
Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;194(3):229-35. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.053199.
8
The contributions of prefrontal cortex and executive control to deception: evidence from activation likelihood estimate meta-analyses.前额叶皮层和执行控制对欺骗行为的作用:激活可能性估计元分析的证据
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Jul;19(7):1557-66. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn189. Epub 2008 Nov 2.
9
Detection of deception about multiple, concealed, mock crime items, based on a spatial-temporal analysis of ERP amplitude and scalp distribution.基于事件相关电位(ERP)振幅和头皮分布的时空分析,对多个隐藏的模拟犯罪物品相关的欺骗行为进行检测。
Psychophysiology. 2008 Sep;45(5):721-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00683.x. Epub 2008 Jul 24.
10
Neural correlates of true memory, false memory, and deception.真实记忆、错误记忆和欺骗的神经关联。
Cereb Cortex. 2008 Dec;18(12):2811-9. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn037. Epub 2008 Mar 27.