• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诈病的检测:一种识别伪装抑郁症的新工具。

The Detection of Malingering: A New Tool to Identify Made-Up Depression.

作者信息

Monaro Merylin, Toncini Andrea, Ferracuti Stefano, Tessari Gianmarco, Vaccaro Maria G, De Fazio Pasquale, Pigato Giorgio, Meneghel Tiziano, Scarpazza Cristina, Sartori Giuseppe

机构信息

Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Department of Human Neurosciences, University of Roma "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 8;9:249. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00249. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00249
PMID:29937740
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6002526/
Abstract

Major depression is a high-prevalence mental disease with major socio-economic impact, for both the direct and the indirect costs. Major depression symptoms can be faked or exaggerated in order to obtain economic compensation from insurance companies. Critically, depression is potentially easily malingered, as the symptoms that characterize this psychiatric disorder are not difficult to emulate. Although some tools to assess malingering of psychiatric conditions are already available, they are principally based on self-reporting and are thus easily faked. In this paper, we propose a new method to automatically detect the simulation of depression, which is based on the analysis of mouse movements while the patient is engaged in a double-choice computerized task, responding to simple and complex questions about depressive symptoms. This tool clearly has a key advantage over the other tools: the kinematic movement is not consciously controllable by the subjects, and thus it is almost impossible to deceive. Two groups of subjects were recruited for the study. The first one, which was used to train different machine-learning algorithms, comprises 60 subjects (20 depressed patients and 40 healthy volunteers); the second one, which was used to test the machine-learning models, comprises 27 subjects (9 depressed patients and 18 healthy volunteers). In both groups, the healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to the liars and truth-tellers group. Machine-learning models were trained on mouse dynamics features, which were collected during the subject response, and on the number of symptoms reported by participants. Statistical results demonstrated that individuals that malingered depression reported a higher number of depressive and non-depressive symptoms than depressed participants, whereas individuals suffering from depression took more time to perform the mouse-based tasks compared to both truth-tellers and liars. Machine-learning models reached a classification accuracy up to 96% in distinguishing liars from depressed patients and truth-tellers. Despite this, the data are not conclusive, as the accuracy of the algorithm has not been compared with the accuracy of the clinicians; this study presents a possible useful method that is worth further investigation.

摘要

重度抑郁症是一种高发性精神疾病,对社会经济有着重大影响,包括直接成本和间接成本。为了从保险公司获得经济赔偿,重度抑郁症症状可能会被伪造或夸大。至关重要的是,抑郁症很容易被伪装,因为这种精神障碍的特征症状并不难模仿。尽管已经有一些评估精神疾病伪装的工具,但它们主要基于自我报告,因此很容易被伪造。在本文中,我们提出了一种自动检测抑郁症伪装的新方法,该方法基于对患者在执行双选计算机任务时鼠标移动的分析,患者需要回答关于抑郁症状的简单和复杂问题。这个工具显然比其他工具有一个关键优势:运动学动作不受受试者有意识控制,因此几乎不可能欺骗。本研究招募了两组受试者。第一组用于训练不同的机器学习算法,由60名受试者组成(20名抑郁症患者和40名健康志愿者);第二组用于测试机器学习模型,由27名受试者组成(9名抑郁症患者和18名健康志愿者)。在两组中,健康志愿者被随机分配到说谎者和说实话者组。机器学习模型根据受试者反应期间收集的鼠标动态特征以及参与者报告的症状数量进行训练。统计结果表明,伪装抑郁症的个体报告的抑郁和非抑郁症状数量比抑郁症患者多,而与说实话者和说谎者相比,抑郁症患者完成基于鼠标的任务花费的时间更多。机器学习模型在区分说谎者与抑郁症患者和说实话者方面的分类准确率高达96%。尽管如此,数据并不具有决定性,因为该算法的准确性尚未与临床医生的准确性进行比较;本研究提出了一种可能有用的方法,值得进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6b9/6002526/c245fb525f8e/fpsyt-09-00249-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6b9/6002526/351eca887efe/fpsyt-09-00249-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6b9/6002526/7f7d5e2ca36a/fpsyt-09-00249-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6b9/6002526/c245fb525f8e/fpsyt-09-00249-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6b9/6002526/351eca887efe/fpsyt-09-00249-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6b9/6002526/7f7d5e2ca36a/fpsyt-09-00249-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6b9/6002526/c245fb525f8e/fpsyt-09-00249-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Detection of Malingering: A New Tool to Identify Made-Up Depression.诈病的检测:一种识别伪装抑郁症的新工具。
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 8;9:249. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00249. eCollection 2018.
2
False Identity Detection Using Complex Sentences.使用复合句进行虚假身份检测。
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 6;9:283. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00283. eCollection 2018.
3
The detection of faked identity using unexpected questions and choice reaction times.利用意外问题和选择反应时间检测伪造身份。
Psychol Res. 2021 Sep;85(6):2474-2482. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01410-4. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
4
The detection of faked identity using unexpected questions and mouse dynamics.利用意外问题和鼠标动态来检测身份伪造。
PLoS One. 2017 May 18;12(5):e0177851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177851. eCollection 2017.
5
Verifiability on the run: an experimental study on the verifiability approach to malingered symptoms.即时可验证性:关于伪装症状可验证性方法的实验研究
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2018 Jun 27;26(1):65-76. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2018.1483272. eCollection 2019.
6
Predicting instructed simulation and dissimulation when screening for depressive symptoms.预测指令性模拟和伪装在抑郁症状筛查中的应用。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020 Mar;270(2):153-168. doi: 10.1007/s00406-018-0967-2. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
7
Faked depression: comparing malingering via the internet, pen-and-paper, and telephone administration modes.伪造抑郁症:比较互联网、纸笔和电话管理模式下的装病。
Telemed J E Health. 2013 Sep;19(9):714-6. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0278. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
8
Defrocking the fraud: the detection of malingering.揭露欺诈行为:伪装病的检测
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 1993;30(2):93-101.
9
[Validation of the Short Cognitive Battery (B2C). Value in screening for Alzheimer's disease and depressive disorders in psychiatric practice].[简短认知功能测试组合(B2C)的验证。在精神科实践中筛查阿尔茨海默病和抑郁症的价值]
Encephale. 2003 May-Jun;29(3 Pt 1):266-72.
10
Been there before? Examining "familiarity" as a moderator for discriminating between true and false intentions.以前去过那里吗?将“熟悉度”作为区分真实意图和虚假意图的调节变量进行研究。
Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 7;5:677. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00677. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Movement Sensing Opportunities for Monitoring Dynamic Cognitive States.用于监测动态认知状态的运动感知机会
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Nov 25;24(23):7530. doi: 10.3390/s24237530.
2
Practical pathway for the management of depression in the workplace: a Canadian perspective.工作场所抑郁症管理的实用路径:加拿大视角
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 5;14:1207653. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1207653. eCollection 2023.
3
Reconstructing individual responses to direct questions: a new method for reconstructing malingered responses.重构对直接问题的个体反应:一种重构伪装反应的新方法。

本文引用的文献

1
False Identity Detection Using Complex Sentences.使用复合句进行虚假身份检测。
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 6;9:283. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00283. eCollection 2018.
2
Covert lie detection using keyboard dynamics.利用键盘动力学进行隐蔽性测谎。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 31;8(1):1976. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20462-6.
3
The detection of faked identity using unexpected questions and mouse dynamics.利用意外问题和鼠标动态来检测身份伪造。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 15;14:1093854. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1093854. eCollection 2023.
4
Methodological and Quality Flaws in the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Mental Health Research: Systematic Review.心理健康研究中人工智能应用的方法学与质量缺陷:系统评价
JMIR Ment Health. 2023 Feb 2;10:e42045. doi: 10.2196/42045.
5
A case report and literature review of cognitive malingering and psychopathology.认知伪装与精神病理学的病例报告及文献综述
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 14;13:981475. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.981475. eCollection 2022.
6
Analysis of malingered psychological symptoms in a clinical sample for early detection in initial interviews.分析临床样本中的伪装心理症状,以便在初次访谈中进行早期检测。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2023 Mar;273(2):427-438. doi: 10.1007/s00406-022-01422-8. Epub 2022 May 19.
7
Symptom and Performance Validity Assessment in European Countries: an Update.欧洲国家的症状与表现效度评估:最新情况
Psychol Inj Law. 2022;15(2):116-127. doi: 10.1007/s12207-021-09436-8. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
8
The detection of malingering in whiplash-related injuries: a targeted literature review of the available strategies.挥鞭样损伤相关诈病的检测:现有策略的针对性文献综述
Int J Legal Med. 2021 Sep;135(5):2017-2032. doi: 10.1007/s00414-021-02589-w. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
9
Knowledge of Depression and Malingering: An Exploratory Investigation.抑郁症与诈病的认知:一项探索性调查。
Eur J Psychol. 2020 Mar 3;16(1):32-44. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v16i1.1730. eCollection 2020 Mar.
10
Translational Application of a Neuro-Scientific Multi-Modal Approach Into Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation: Why and How?神经科学多模态方法在法医精神病学评估中的转化应用:为何及如何应用?
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 5;12:597918. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.597918. eCollection 2021.
PLoS One. 2017 May 18;12(5):e0177851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177851. eCollection 2017.
4
Lying takes time: A meta-analysis on reaction time measures of deception.说谎需要时间:关于说谎反应时测谎的元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2017 Apr;143(4):428-453. doi: 10.1037/bul0000087. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
5
Influence of countermeasures on the validity of the Concealed Information Test.应对措施对隐蔽信息测试效度的影响。
Psychophysiology. 2016 Sep;53(9):1429-40. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12690. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
6
A novel methodology for the objective ascertainment of psychic and existential damage.一种用于客观确定精神和生存损害的新方法。
Int J Legal Med. 2016 Sep;130(5):1387-99. doi: 10.1007/s00414-016-1366-8. Epub 2016 May 4.
7
STATISTICS. The reusable holdout: Preserving validity in adaptive data analysis.统计学。可重复保留:自适应数据分析中的有效性保持。
Science. 2015 Aug 7;349(6248):636-8. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa9375.
8
Application of high-dimensional feature selection: evaluation for genomic prediction in man.高维特征选择的应用:人类基因组预测评估
Sci Rep. 2015 May 19;5:10312. doi: 10.1038/srep10312.
9
Countering countermeasures: detecting identity lies by detecting conscious breakthrough.应对之策:通过检测有意识的突破来识破身份谎言。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 7;9(3):e90595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090595. eCollection 2014.
10
The autobiographical IAT: a review.自传体 IAT:综述。
Front Psychol. 2013 Aug 13;4:519. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00519. eCollection 2013.