1 University of Exeter, Truro, UK.
2 University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Qual Health Res. 2018 Jul;28(8):1320-1329. doi: 10.1177/1049732318764386. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
As part of a process evaluation, we explored in semi-structured interviews the experiences of 19 mothers who had taken part in a trial to reduce infant formula-milk intake and promote healthy weight gain, and reflections of three facilitators who delivered the intervention and control group protocols. Mothers appreciated the nonjudgmental support provided during the trial, after experiencing stigma and receiving limited advice on how, how much, and how often formula-milk should be given. The information mothers had previously found, printed on formula-milk tins, or provided by family, friends, and health professionals was often perceived as contradictory; the trial guidance also conflicted with social norms relating infant health positively with weight gain. For those recruited into the trial with older infants, who had already exceeded the recommendations, reducing formula-milk amounts was difficult. The findings highlight the difficulties of addressing a highly stigmatized, complex social practice with an individual, behavioral intervention approach.
作为过程评估的一部分,我们通过半结构化访谈探索了 19 位参与减少婴儿配方奶摄入量和促进健康体重增加试验的母亲的经验,以及三位实施干预和对照组方案的促进者的反思。母亲们在经历了耻辱和收到有关应如何、多少以及多久给予配方奶的有限建议后,赞赏在试验期间提供的非评判性支持。母亲们之前在配方奶粉罐上找到的、印刷的或由家人、朋友和卫生专业人员提供的信息往往相互矛盾;试验指导也与与婴儿健康与体重增加正相关的社会规范相冲突。对于那些被招募到试验中年龄较大的婴儿的母亲来说,因为婴儿已经超过了建议量,所以减少配方奶的摄入量是很困难的。研究结果突显了以个体、行为干预方法来解决高度污名化、复杂的社会行为所面临的困难。