School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Royal Victoria Hospital Site, McGill University, Ross Pavilion R4.29, 687, Pine Ave W., Montreal, QC, H3A 1A1, Canada.
Département de médecine familiale et de médecine d'urgence, Centre de Recherche sur le Cancer, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Universite Laval, 9 rue McMahon, Québec, QC, G1R 2J6, Canada.
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Sep;26(9):3063-3071. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4156-7. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
People with cancer may experience change in what constitutes quality of life (QOL) over time as a result of the cancer progression (true change) or adaptation to the experience, considered as a response shift phenomenon. As individualized measures are ideally suited to explore response shift, this study aimed to estimate the extent to which reconceptualization response shift occurred over time in a cancer population and the impact of this response shift on estimates of change on QOL measures.
Ninety-seven people with advanced cancer completed the study measures including the Patient-Generated Index (PGI) at diagnosis (T0) and 1 year later (T1). The response shift indicator was the change in the number of areas nominated (range - 4 to + 3). Multivariate linear regression was used to estimate the effect of changing areas on change in the PGI score, single indicators of global QOL, and the EQ-5D adjusted for age and sex.
Approximately 72% of people in this sample either added or dropped areas over time. People who dropped more than two areas had higher PGI scores at T1 than T0 while people who added areas showed low PGI score.
The results are consistent with the PGI framework as areas nominated tend to focus on negative aspects of QOL.
由于癌症的进展(真实变化)或对经历的适应,癌症患者的生活质量(QOL)可能会随着时间的推移而发生变化,这被认为是反应转移现象。由于个体化的衡量标准最适合探索反应转移,本研究旨在估计在癌症人群中,随着时间的推移,重新概念化反应转移的程度,以及这种反应转移对 QOL 衡量标准变化估计的影响。
97 名晚期癌症患者完成了研究措施,包括在诊断时(T0)和 1 年后(T1)的患者生成指数(PGI)。反应转移指标是指定区域数量的变化(范围为-4 到+3)。多变量线性回归用于估计变化区域对 PGI 评分、整体 QOL 的单一指标以及根据年龄和性别调整的 EQ-5D 变化的影响。
该样本中约 72%的人随着时间的推移增加或减少了区域。与 T0 相比,减少两个以上区域的人在 T1 时的 PGI 评分更高,而增加区域的人则表现出较低的 PGI 评分。
结果与 PGI 框架一致,因为指定的区域往往集中在 QOL 的负面方面。