• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大学校园餐饮环境中主菜的健康程度与学生的购买情况

The Healthfulness of Entrées and Students' Purchases in a University Campus Dining Environment.

作者信息

Leischner Krista, McCormack Lacey Arneson, Britt Brian C, Heiberger Greg, Kattelmann Kendra

机构信息

Health & Nutritional Sciences Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA.

Journalism & Mass Communications Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2018 Mar 22;6(2):28. doi: 10.3390/healthcare6020028.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare6020028
PMID:29565273
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6023427/
Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the availability of "more healthful" (MH) versus "less healthful" (LH) entrée items in the campus dining and if students' purchases are reflective of what is offered. This is an observational study in which purchases of the available entrée items in the campus dining at South Dakota State University in one academic year were collected and categorized as either MH or LH according to the American Heart Association guidelines. Chi-square tests were used to determine the differences between the proportion of purchased MH and LH versus those available. Odds ratio estimates with 95% confidence limits were used to determine the associations between the demographics and MH and LH purchases. Of the total entrée items available, 15.0% were MH and 85.0% were LH. In the fall, 8.0% of purchases were MH and 92.0% purchases were LH as compared to 8.9% MH and 91.1% LH in the spring. Whites were less likely than non-whites to purchase a MH entrée. Females were two times more likely to choose MH entrées than males. The campus dining offerings and students' purchases of entrees were primarily LH. Work with campus dining providers to create profitable, yet healthful, dining entrees is needed to improve the healthfulness of offerings.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定校园餐饮中“更健康的”(MH)与“不太健康的”(LH)主菜项目的可获得性,以及学生的购买行为是否反映了所提供的菜品情况。这是一项观察性研究,收集了南达科他州立大学校园餐饮在一个学年内提供的主菜项目的购买情况,并根据美国心脏协会的指南将其分类为MH或LH。使用卡方检验来确定购买的MH和LH菜品比例与可获得的菜品比例之间的差异。使用具有95%置信区间的比值比估计来确定人口统计学特征与MH和LH菜品购买之间的关联。在所有可获得的主菜项目中,15.0%为MH,85.0%为LH。秋季,购买的MH菜品占8.0%,LH菜品占92.0%;春季,购买的MH菜品占8.9%,LH菜品占91.1%。白人购买MH主菜的可能性低于非白人。女性选择MH主菜的可能性是男性的两倍。校园餐饮提供的菜品和学生购买的主菜主要是LH。需要与校园餐饮供应商合作,创造既盈利又健康的餐饮主菜,以提高所提供菜品的健康程度。

相似文献

1
The Healthfulness of Entrées and Students' Purchases in a University Campus Dining Environment.大学校园餐饮环境中主菜的健康程度与学生的购买情况
Healthcare (Basel). 2018 Mar 22;6(2):28. doi: 10.3390/healthcare6020028.
2
Assessment of a University Campus Food Environment, California, 2015.2015年加利福尼亚大学校园食品环境评估
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Feb 4;13:E18. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.150455.
3
You can't "nudge" nuggets: An investigation of college late-night dining with behavioral economics interventions.你不能“推动”鸡块:行为经济学干预下的大学生深夜就餐调查。
PLoS One. 2018 May 31;13(5):e0198162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198162. eCollection 2018.
4
Assessment of the dining environment on and near the campuses of fifteen post-secondary institutions.对十五所高等院校及其周边餐饮环境的评估。
Public Health Nutr. 2013 Jul;16(7):1186-96. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012004454. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
5
Students' perspectives on promoting healthful food choices from campus vending machines: a qualitative interview study.学生对促进校园自动售货机健康食品选择的看法:一项定性访谈研究
BMC Public Health. 2015 May 28;15:512. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1859-2.
6
Single-Meal Nutrient Assessment by a Self-Administered, Electronic Exit Survey Compared with a Multipass Dietary Interview in University Undergraduates in an All-You-Care-to-Eat Campus Dining Hall.在一个提供任意份量的校园自助餐厅中,通过自我管理的电子出口调查与多阶段饮食访谈对大学生进行单餐营养素评估。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 May;119(5):739-749. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.01.020.
7
Increasing frequency of lower-fat entrees offered at school lunch: an environmental change strategy to increase healthful selections.学校午餐中提供的低脂主菜频率增加:一种增加健康选择的环境改变策略。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Feb;106(2):248-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2005.10.030.
8
A College Fast-Food Environment and Student Food and Beverage Choices: Developing an Integrated Database to Examine Food and Beverage Purchasing Choices among College Students.大学校园快餐环境与学生食物和饮料选择:建立一个整合数据库以考察大学生的食物和饮料购买选择。
Nutrients. 2022 Feb 21;14(4):900. doi: 10.3390/nu14040900.
9
Effects of campus dining sustainable practices on consumers' perception and behavioral intention in the United States.美国校园餐饮可持续实践对消费者认知及行为意向的影响。
Nutr Res Pract. 2023 Oct;17(5):1019-1027. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2023.17.5.1019. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
10
Gender and race are significant determinants of students' food choices on a college campus.性别和种族是影响大学校园学生食物选择的重要决定因素。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012 Jul-Aug;44(4):372-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2011.12.007. Epub 2012 May 17.

引用本文的文献

1
University Food Environment Assessment Methods and Their Implications: Protocol for a Systematic Review.大学食品环境评估方法及其影响:系统评价方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Aug 23;13:e54955. doi: 10.2196/54955.
2
Assessing the Healthfulness of University Food Environments: A Systematic Review of Methods and Tools.评估大学食品环境的健康程度:方法和工具的系统评价。
Nutrients. 2024 May 9;16(10):1426. doi: 10.3390/nu16101426.
3
Effect of living arrangement on anthropometric traits in first-year university students from Canada: The GENEiUS study.居住安排对加拿大一年级大学生人体测量特征的影响:GENEiUS 研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 6;15(11):e0241744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241744. eCollection 2020.
4
Impulsivity as a risk factor for weight gain and body roundness change among college freshmen.冲动性是大学新生体重增加和身体圆润度变化的一个风险因素。
Eat Behav. 2020 Dec;39:101435. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2020.101435. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
5
A free-produce stand on campus: impact on fruit and vegetable intake in Dutch university students.校园免费摊位:对荷兰大学生水果和蔬菜摄入量的影响。
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Apr;23(5):924-934. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019003574. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
6
A Systematic Review on Socioeconomic Differences in the Association between the Food Environment and Dietary Behaviors.一项关于食物环境与饮食行为关联的社会经济差异的系统评价。
Nutrients. 2019 Sep 13;11(9):2215. doi: 10.3390/nu11092215.
7
A Prospective Study of Alcohol Use Patterns and Short-Term Weight Change in College Freshmen.一项关于大学生饮酒模式与短期体重变化的前瞻性研究。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019 May;43(5):1016-1026. doi: 10.1111/acer.14025. Epub 2019 Apr 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of a University Campus Food Environment, California, 2015.2015年加利福尼亚大学校园食品环境评估
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Feb 4;13:E18. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.150455.
2
Preventing weight gain with calorie-labeling.通过卡路里标注防止体重增加。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014 Nov;22(11):2277-83. doi: 10.1002/oby.20885.
3
How Much Should We Weigh for a Long and Healthy Life Span? The Need to Reconcile Caloric Restriction versus Longevity with Body Mass Index versus Mortality Data.为了长寿和健康,我们应该多重?需要调和热量限制与长寿与体重指数与死亡率数据。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2014 Jul 30;5:121. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2014.00121. eCollection 2014.
4
Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011-2012.美国儿童和成人肥胖率,2011-2012 年。
JAMA. 2014 Feb 26;311(8):806-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.732.
5
Assessment of the dining environment on and near the campuses of fifteen post-secondary institutions.对十五所高等院校及其周边餐饮环境的评估。
Public Health Nutr. 2013 Jul;16(7):1186-96. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012004454. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
6
Weight Gain Prevention for College Freshmen: Comparing Two Social Cognitive Theory-Based Interventions with and without Explicit Self-Regulation Training.大学新生体重增加预防:比较两种基于社会认知理论的干预措施,一种有明确的自我调节训练,另一种没有。
J Obes. 2012;2012:803769. doi: 10.1155/2012/803769. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
7
Healthy convenience: nudging students toward healthier choices in the lunchroom.健康便利:在餐厅引导学生选择更健康的食物。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2012 Aug;34(3):370-6. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fds003. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
8
Helping consumers make a more conscious nutritional choice: acceptability of nutrition information at a cafeteria.帮助消费者做出更有意识的营养选择:自助餐厅营养信息的可接受性。
Public Health Nutr. 2012 May;15(5):792-801. doi: 10.1017/S1368980011002990. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
9
Obesity and Food Choices Among Faculty and Staff at a Large Urban University.肥胖与大型城市大学教职员工的食物选择。
J Am Coll Health. 2010;59(3):205-10. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2010.502203.
10
Positive changes in perceptions and selections of healthful foods by college students after a short-term point-of-selection intervention at a dining hall.在餐厅进行短期选择点干预后,大学生对健康食品的看法和选择发生积极变化。
J Am Coll Health. 2010 Mar-Apr;58(5):425-31. doi: 10.1080/07448480903540457.