Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Health and Human Services, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.
Institute for Advancing Health Through Agriculture, Texas A&M AgriLife Research Center at El Paso, Texas A&M University, El Paso, TX 79927, USA.
Nutrients. 2024 May 9;16(10):1426. doi: 10.3390/nu16101426.
The availability, promotion, and price of healthy foods within the university food environment may impact students' dietary choices. This systematic review summarizes the tools and methods used to assess the healthfulness of university food environments where many students spend a significant portion of their emerging adulthood. Thirty-six global studies published between 2012 and 2022 were sourced from PubMed (NNLM), Cochrane Library (Wiley), Web of Science (Clarivate), APA PsycInfo (EBSCO), CINHAL Complete (EBSCO), ProQuest Nursing, and Allied Health, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Of the included studies, 58% were institutional-level audits, 17% examined individual-level perceptions, and 25% combined both. Most institutional-level audits focused on one aspect of the food environment (e.g., eateries, vending machines). For studies examining multiple spaces within the campus environment (38%), comprehensive assessments were limited, and most studies had to employ a combination of assessment tools. Surveys were most often used to gather individual perceptions about the food environment. The Nutrition Environment Measures Survey (NEMS) was the most commonly used tool across all studies. This review highlights the need for a standardized tool, method, or a "healthy" benchmark for specific use at universities to improve methodological rigor and comparability of findings across institutions.
大学食品环境中健康食品的供应、推广和价格可能会影响学生的饮食选择。本系统综述总结了评估大学生食品环境健康状况的工具和方法,因为许多学生在成年早期的大部分时间都在这个环境中度过。从 2012 年至 2022 年,在 PubMed(美国国立医学图书馆)、Cochrane Library(Wiley)、Web of Science(科睿唯安)、APA PsycInfo(EBSCO)、CINHAL Complete(EBSCO)、ProQuest Nursing 和 Allied Health 数据库中,根据 PRISMA 2020 指南,共检索到 36 篇全球研究。这些研究中,58%为机构层面的审计,17%考察了个体层面的看法,25%则同时涉及两者。大多数机构层面的审计都集中在食品环境的一个方面(如餐饮场所、自动售货机)。对于那些研究校园环境内多个空间的研究(38%),综合评估是有限的,而且大多数研究不得不结合使用多种评估工具。调查通常用于收集关于食品环境的个体看法。《营养环境测量工具》(NEMS)是所有研究中使用最广泛的工具。本综述强调需要一种标准化的工具、方法或“健康”基准,以便在大学中具体使用,以提高方法学的严谨性和机构间研究结果的可比性。