1 Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic , Rochester, Minnesota.
2 Department of Neurology, Center for Health + Technology, University of Rochester Medical Center , Rochester, New York.
Telemed J E Health. 2018 Dec;24(12):979-992. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0295. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
Telemedicine is increasingly used to care for patients with movement disorders, but data regarding its global use are limited.
To obtain baseline international data about telemedicine use among movement disorder clinicians.
An online survey was sent to all 6,056 Movement Disorder Society members in 2015. Scope, reimbursement, and perceived quality of telemedicine were assessed.
There were 549 respondents (9.1% overall response rate) from 83 countries. Most (85.8%) were physicians, and most (70.9%) worked in an academic or university practice. Half of respondents (n = 287, from 57 countries) used telemedicine for clinical care; activities included e-mail (63.2%), video visits (follow-up [39.7%] and new [35.2%]), and video-based education (35.2%). One hundred five respondents personally conducted video visits, most frequently to outpatient clinics (53.5%), patient homes (30.8%), and hospital inpatients (30.3%). The most common challenges were a limited neurological examination (58.9%) and technological difficulties (53.3%), and the most common benefits were reduced travel time (92.9%) and patient costs (60.1%). The most frequent reimbursements were none (39.0%), public insurance (24.5%), and patient payment (9.3%). Half of respondents planned to use telemedicine in the future, and three-quarters were interested in telemedicine education.
More than 250 respondents around the world engage in telemedicine for movement disorders; most perceived benefit for patients, despite challenges and reimbursement for clinicians. Formal instruction on telemedicine is highly desired. Although the survey response was low and possibly biased to over represent those with telemedicine experience, the study provides baseline data for future comparison and to improve telemedicine delivery.
远程医疗越来越多地用于治疗运动障碍患者,但有关其全球使用的数据有限。
为了获得运动障碍临床医生使用远程医疗的国际基线数据。
2015 年,向所有 6056 名运动障碍学会成员发送了在线调查。评估了远程医疗的范围、报销和感知质量。
来自 83 个国家的 549 名受访者(总体响应率为 9.1%)做出了回应。大多数(85.8%)是医生,大多数(70.9%)在学术或大学实践中工作。一半的受访者(n=287,来自 57 个国家)将远程医疗用于临床护理;活动包括电子邮件(63.2%)、视频访问(随访[39.7%]和新[35.2%])和基于视频的教育(35.2%)。105 名受访者亲自进行视频访问,最常见的是门诊(53.5%)、患者家庭(30.8%)和住院患者(30.3%)。最常见的挑战是神经检查有限(58.9%)和技术困难(53.3%),最常见的好处是减少旅行时间(92.9%)和患者费用(60.1%)。最常见的报销方式是无(39.0%)、公共保险(24.5%)和患者支付(9.3%)。一半的受访者计划在未来使用远程医疗,四分之三的人对远程医疗教育感兴趣。
全球有 250 多名受访者参与了运动障碍的远程医疗;尽管对临床医生有挑战和报销,但大多数人认为对患者有益。对远程医疗的正式指导有很高的需求。尽管调查的回应率较低,可能偏向于对远程医疗有经验的人,但该研究为未来的比较和改进远程医疗服务提供了基线数据。