Bryant-Moore Keneshia, Haynes Tiffany, Kuo Dennis Z, Stewart M Kathryn, Yeary Karen Hye-Cheon Kim, Smith Johnny, Turner Jerome, Ounpraseuth Songthip T, Sullivan Greer, McCoy Stephanie, Hudson Brittany, Harris Kimberly
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Public Health Nurs. 2018 Jul;35(4):353-359. doi: 10.1111/phn.12397. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
A community-academic team implemented a study involving collection of quantitative data using a computer-based audience response system (ARS) whereby community partners led data collection efforts. The team participated in a reflection exercise after the data collection to evaluate and identify best practices and lessons learned about the community partner-led process.
DESIGN & SAMPLE: The methods involved a qualitative research consultant who facilitated the reflection exercise that consisted of two focus groups-one academic and one community research team members. The consultant then conducted content analysis. Nine members participated in the focus groups.
The reflection identified the following themes: the positive aspects of the ARS; challenges to overcome; and recommendations for the future.
The lessons learned here can help community-academic research partnerships identify the best circumstances in which to use ARS for data collection and practical steps to aid in its success.
一个社区-学术团队开展了一项研究，该研究使用基于计算机的观众反应系统（ARS）收集定量数据，数据收集工作由社区合作伙伴主导。在数据收集完成后，该团队参与了一次反思活动，以评估并确定有关社区合作伙伴主导流程的最佳实践和经验教训。
方法包括一名定性研究顾问，该顾问推动了反思活动，反思活动由两个焦点小组组成，一个是学术研究团队成员小组，另一个是社区研究团队成员小组。然后，该顾问进行了内容分析。九个成员参与了焦点小组。
反思确定了以下主题：ARS的积极方面；需要克服的挑战；以及对未来的建议。
这里学到的经验教训可以帮助社区-学术研究伙伴关系确定使用ARS进行数据收集的最佳情况以及有助于其成功的实际步骤。
