• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区合作研究者对社区学术研究团队中的群体动态和公平伙伴关系的看法。

Perspectives of Community Co-Researchers About Group Dynamics and Equitable Partnership Within a Community-Academic Research Team.

机构信息

1 Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

2 University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

出版信息

Health Educ Behav. 2018 Oct;45(5):682-689. doi: 10.1177/1090198118769374. Epub 2018 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1177/1090198118769374
PMID:29618239
Abstract

Equitable partnership processes and group dynamics, including individual, relational, and structural factors, have been identified as key ingredients to successful community-based participatory research partnerships. The purpose of this qualitative study was to investigate the key aspects of group dynamics and partnership from the perspectives of community members serving as co-researchers. Semistructured, in-depth interviews were conducted with 15 Latino immigrant co-researchers from an intervention project with Latinos Unidos por la Salud (LU-Salud), a community research team composed of Latino immigrant community members and academic investigators working in a health research partnership. A deductive framework approach guided the interview process and qualitative data analysis. The LU-Salud co-researchers described relationships, personal growth, beliefs/identity motivation (individual dynamics), coexistence (relational dynamics), diversity, and power/resource sharing (structural dynamics) as key foundational aspects of the community-academic partnership. Building on existing CBPR and team science frameworks, these findings demonstrate that group dynamics and partnership processes are fundamental drivers of individual-level motivation and meaning making, which ultimately sustain efforts of community partners to engage with the research team and also contribute to the achievement of intended research outcomes.

摘要

公平的伙伴关系过程和群体动态,包括个体、关系和结构因素,已被确定为成功的基于社区的参与式研究伙伴关系的关键要素。本定性研究的目的是从作为共同研究者的社区成员的角度调查群体动态和伙伴关系的关键方面。对来自拉丁裔团结为健康组织(LU-Salud)的干预项目的 15 名拉丁裔移民共同研究者进行了半结构化的深入访谈,LU-Salud 是一个由拉丁裔移民社区成员和在健康研究伙伴关系中工作的学术研究人员组成的社区研究团队。演绎框架方法指导了访谈过程和定性数据分析。LU-Salud 的共同研究者将关系、个人成长、信念/身份动机(个体动态)、共存(关系动态)、多样性以及权力/资源共享(结构动态)描述为社区-学术伙伴关系的关键基础方面。在现有的基于社区的参与式研究和团队科学框架基础上,这些发现表明,群体动态和伙伴关系过程是个体层面动机和意义构建的基本驱动因素,这最终维持了社区合作伙伴参与研究团队的努力,也有助于实现预期的研究成果。

相似文献

1
Perspectives of Community Co-Researchers About Group Dynamics and Equitable Partnership Within a Community-Academic Research Team.社区合作研究者对社区学术研究团队中的群体动态和公平伙伴关系的看法。
Health Educ Behav. 2018 Oct;45(5):682-689. doi: 10.1177/1090198118769374. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
2
The Bidirectional Engagement and Equity (BEE) Research Framework to Guide Community-Academic Partnerships: Developed From a Narrative Review and Diverse Stakeholder Perspectives.指导社区-学术伙伴关系的双向参与与公平(BEE)研究框架:基于叙事性综述和多元利益相关者视角制定
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14161. doi: 10.1111/hex.14161.
3
Capacity building through focus group training in community-based participatory research.通过焦点小组培训开展基于社区的参与性研究进行能力建设。
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2011 Dec;24(3):638. Epub 2011 Dec 4.
4
Perceptions of Empowerment Within and Across Partnerships in Community-Based Participatory Research: A Dyadic Interview Analysis.社区参与式研究中伙伴关系内部及跨伙伴关系的赋权认知:二元访谈分析
Qual Health Res. 2016 Jan;26(1):105-16. doi: 10.1177/1049732315577606. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
5
A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects.基于社区参与式研究的现实主义评价:伙伴关系协同效应、信任建立及相关连锁反应。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 30;15:725. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1949-1.
6
Guidance for Genuine Collaboration: Insights from Academic, Tribal, and Community Partner Interviews on a New Research Partnership.关于真正合作的指导:从学术、部落和社区合作伙伴访谈中获得的新研究伙伴关系的见解。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 16;16(24):5132. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16245132.
7
Team-building activities as strategies for improving community-university partnerships: lessons learned from Nuestro Futuro Saludable.团队建设活动作为改善社区与大学伙伴关系的策略:从“我们健康的未来”项目中汲取的经验教训
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012 Summer;6(2):213-8. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0030.
8
A capacity building program to promote CBPR partnerships between academic researchers and community members.一个能力建设项目,旨在促进学术研究人员和社区成员之间的 CBPR 伙伴关系。
Clin Transl Sci. 2011 Dec;4(6):428-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00362.x. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
9
The role of Latino/Hispanic communities in health services research: strategies for a meaningful partnership.拉丁裔/西班牙裔社区在卫生服务研究中的作用:建立有意义伙伴关系的策略。
J Med Syst. 1996 Oct;20(5):317-28. doi: 10.1007/BF02257043.
10
"That Felt Like Real Engagement": Fostering and Maintaining Inclusive Research Collaborations With Individuals With Intellectual Disability.“感觉就像真正的参与”:促进和维持与智障人士的包容性研究合作。
Qual Health Res. 2020 Jan;30(2):236-249. doi: 10.1177/1049732319869620. Epub 2019 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Insights from one American Indian tribe about heart health.来自一个美洲印第安部落的关于心脏健康的见解。
Am Heart J Plus. 2025 Jun 11;56:100564. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2025.100564. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Engaging American Indian Tribal Members Using Group-Level Assessment to Identify Needs and Priorities of a Local Heart Disease Program to Improve Cardiac Care.通过群体层面评估吸引美国印第安部落成员,以确定当地心脏病项目改善心脏护理的需求和优先事项。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 20;14(10):e036624. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036624. Epub 2025 May 7.
3
Using a co-design approach to develop a Preventative Online Mental Health Program for Youth (POMHPY): a quality improvement project.
采用协同设计方法开发青少年预防性在线心理健康项目(POMHPY):一项质量改进项目。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 8;25(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12101-w.
4
Adapting Group Model Building for Mental Healthcare: A Participatory Co-Design Approach.将群体模型构建应用于精神卫生保健:一种参与式协同设计方法。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Feb;34(1):e13451. doi: 10.1111/inm.13451. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
5
Community-Partnered Research appraisal tool for conducting, reporting and assessing community-based research.社区伙伴关系研究评估工具,用于进行、报告和评估基于社区的研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 25;14(4):e081625. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081625.
6
The WHO atlas for female-genital schistosomiasis: Co-design of a practicable diagnostic guide, digital support and training.世界卫生组织女性生殖器血吸虫病图谱:实用诊断指南、数字支持及培训的协同设计
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Mar 18;4(3):e0002249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002249. eCollection 2024.
7
Family-focused obesity prevention program implementation in urban versus rural communities: a case study.以家庭为中心的肥胖预防计划在城市与农村社区的实施:一个案例研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 22;21(1):1915. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11967-3.
8
Latino-to-Latino: Promotores' Beliefs on Engaging Latino Participants in Autism Research.拉丁裔对拉丁裔:促进者对参与自闭症研究的拉丁裔参与者的信念。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022 Aug;9(4):1125-1134. doi: 10.1007/s40615-021-01053-0. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
9
Creating a Culture of Youth as Co-Researchers: The Kickoff of a Year-Long STEM Pipeline Program.营造青少年作为共同研究者的文化氛围:为期一年的STEM人才培养计划启动
J STEM Outreach. 2020;3(1). doi: 10.15695/jstem/v3i1.02. Epub 2020 Feb 18.