Tziafas Dimitrios, Kodonas Konstantinos
Department of Endodontology, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Endodontic Program, European University College, Ibn Sina 27D Building, DHCC Dubai, UAE.
Dent J (Basel). 2015 Nov 27;3(4):133-156. doi: 10.3390/dj3040133.
Reviews on the clinical performance of vital pulp treatment strategies and capping materials repeatedly showed an insufficient grade of evidence concerning their therapeutic validity. The biological mechanisms underlying the regenerative potential of pulp-dentin complex have attracted much attention during the last two decades, since new pulp treatment modalities have been designed and tested at the preclinical level. It has been recognized that evaluation should be based on the specific ability of therapeutic interventions to signal recruitment and differentiation of odontoblast-like cells forming a matrix in a predentin-like pattern, rather than uncontrolled hard tissue deposition in a scar-like form. The aim of the present article was to critically review data from histological experimental studies on pulp capping, published during the last 7 decades. A comprehensive literature search covering the period from 1949 to 2015 was done using the Medline/Pubmed database. Inclusion of a study was dependent on having sufficient data regarding the type of capping material used and the unit of observation (human permanent tooth or animal permanent dentition; primary teeth were excluded). The post-operatively deposited matrix was categorized into three types: unspecified, osteotypic, or dentin-like matrix. One hundred fifty-two studies were included in the final evaluation. Data from the present systematic review have shown that only 30.2% of the 152 experimental histological pulp capping studies described the heterogenic nature of the hard tissue bridge formation, including osteotypic and tubular mineralized tissue. Structural characteristics of the new matrix and the associated formative cells were not provided by the remaining 106 studies. Analysis showed that more careful preclinical evaluation with emphasis on the evidence regarding the dentinogenic specificity of pulp therapies is required. It seems that selection of appropriate vital pulp treatment strategies and pulp capping materials would be further facilitated in terms of their therapeutic validity if international consensus could be reached on a select number of mandatory criteria for tissue-specific dentinogenic events.
关于活髓治疗策略和盖髓材料临床性能的综述反复表明,关于其治疗有效性的证据等级不足。在过去二十年中,牙髓 - 牙本质复合体再生潜力的生物学机制备受关注,因为新的牙髓治疗方式已在临床前水平进行设计和测试。人们已经认识到,评估应基于治疗干预促使成牙本质细胞样细胞募集和分化并以类前期牙本质模式形成基质的特定能力,而不是非受控的瘢痕样硬组织沉积。本文的目的是批判性地回顾过去70年中发表的关于盖髓组织学实验研究的数据。使用Medline/Pubmed数据库对1949年至2015年期间进行了全面的文献检索。纳入一项研究取决于是否有关于所用盖髓材料类型和观察单位(人类恒牙或动物恒牙列;排除乳牙)的充分数据。术后沉积的基质分为三种类型:未明确指定的、骨样的或牙本质样基质。152项研究纳入了最终评估。本系统评价的数据表明,在152项实验性组织学盖髓研究中,只有30.2%描述了硬组织桥形成的异质性,包括骨样和管状矿化组织。其余106项研究未提供新基质的结构特征和相关的形成细胞。分析表明,需要更仔细的临床前评估,重点是关于牙髓治疗牙本质生成特异性的证据。如果能够就一些组织特异性牙本质生成事件的强制性标准达成国际共识,那么在治疗有效性方面,似乎将进一步促进选择合适的活髓治疗策略和盖髓材料。